These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29470102)

  • 1. What You Don't Notice Can Harm You: Age-Related Differences in Detecting Concurrent Visual, Auditory, and Tactile Cues.
    Pitts BJ; Sarter N
    Hum Factors; 2018 Jun; 60(4):445-464. PubMed ID: 29470102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tactile, Visual, and Crossmodal Visual-Tactile Change Blindness: The Effect of Transient Type and Task Demands.
    Riggs SL; Sarter N
    Hum Factors; 2019 Feb; 61(1):5-24. PubMed ID: 30566845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Supporting interruption management and multimodal interface design: three meta-analyses of task performance as a function of interrupting task modality.
    Lu SA; Wickens CD; Prinet JC; Hutchins SD; Sarter N; Sebok A
    Hum Factors; 2013 Aug; 55(4):697-724. PubMed ID: 23964412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Now You Feel It, Now You Don't: The Effect of Movement, Cue Complexity, and Body Location on Tactile Change Detection.
    Gomes K; Betza S; Riggs SL
    Hum Factors; 2020 Jun; 62(4):643-655. PubMed ID: 31180742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multisensory Perception of Contradictory Information in an Environment of Varying Reliability: Evidence for Conscious Perception and Optimal Causal Inference.
    Mahani MN; Sheybani S; Bausenhart KM; Ulrich R; Ahmadabadi MN
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):3167. PubMed ID: 28600573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age-related changes in auditory and visual interactions in temporal rate perception.
    Brooks CJ; Anderson AJ; Roach NW; McGraw PV; McKendrick AM
    J Vis; 2015; 15(16):2. PubMed ID: 26624937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enhanced perception and performance by multimodal threat cueing in simulated combat vehicle.
    Oskarsson PA; Eriksson L; Carlander O
    Hum Factors; 2012 Feb; 54(1):122-37. PubMed ID: 22409107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phasic alertness cues modulate visual processing speed in healthy aging.
    Haupt M; Sorg C; Napiórkowski N; Finke K
    Neurobiol Aging; 2018 Oct; 70():30-39. PubMed ID: 29944993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of auditory and tactile warning on response to visual hazards under a noisy environment.
    Murata A; Kuroda T; Karwowski W
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Apr; 60():58-67. PubMed ID: 28166900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early auditory change detection implicitly facilitated by ignored concurrent visual change during a Braille reading task.
    Aoyama A; Haruyama T; Kuriki S
    J Integr Neurosci; 2013 Sep; 12(3):385-99. PubMed ID: 24070061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reciprocal Interactions Between Audition and Touch in Flutter Frequency Perception.
    Convento S; Wegner-Clemens KA; Yau JM
    Multisens Res; 2019 Jan; 32(1):67-85. PubMed ID: 31059492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of aging and interaural delay on the detection of a break in the interaural correlation between two sounds.
    Li L; Huang J; Wu X; Qi JG; Schneider BA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):273-86. PubMed ID: 19194287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Specifying advantages of multi-modal cueing: Quantifying improvements with augmented tactile information.
    White TL; Hancock PA
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Oct; 88():103146. PubMed ID: 32421638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cross-modal cueing in audiovisual spatial attention.
    Blurton SP; Greenlee MW; Gondan M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2356-76. PubMed ID: 26001381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of auditory and tactile crossmodal cues in a dual-task visual and auditory scenario.
    Hopkins K; Kass SJ; Blalock LD; Brill JC
    Ergonomics; 2017 May; 60(5):692-700. PubMed ID: 27267493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic selective attention as a function of sensory modality in aging.
    Guerreiro MJ; Adam JJ; Van Gerven PW
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2012 Mar; 67(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 21798856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-modal links among vision, audition, and touch in complex environments.
    Ferris TK; Sarter NB
    Hum Factors; 2008 Feb; 50(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 18354968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does the sight of physical threat induce a tactile processing bias? Modality-specific attentional facilitation induced by viewing threatening pictures.
    Van Damme S; Gallace A; Spence C; Crombez G; Moseley GL
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1253():100-6. PubMed ID: 19094970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating the relative weights of visual and auditory tau versus heuristic-based cues for time-to-contact judgments in realistic, familiar scenes by older and younger adults.
    Keshavarz B; Campos JL; DeLucia PR; Oberfeld D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Apr; 79(3):929-944. PubMed ID: 28097504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Critique of "Tactile, Visual, and Crossmodal Visual-Tactile Change Blindness: The Effect of Transient Type and Task Demands".
    Greenlee ET
    Hum Factors; 2019 Feb; 61(1):25-28. PubMed ID: 30566842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.