BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29470520)

  • 1. Association between expression of random gene sets and survival is evident in multiple cancer types and may be explained by sub-classification.
    Shimoni Y
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Feb; 14(2):e1006026. PubMed ID: 29470520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identification of common prognostic gene expression signatures with biological meanings from microarray gene expression datasets.
    Yao J; Zhao Q; Yuan Y; Zhang L; Liu X; Yung WK; Weinstein JN
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45894. PubMed ID: 23029298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A 35-gene signature discriminates between rapidly- and slowly-progressing glioblastoma multiforme and predicts survival in known subtypes of the cancer.
    Fatai AA; Gamieldien J
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Apr; 18(1):377. PubMed ID: 29614978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integrative analysis of survival-associated gene sets in breast cancer.
    Varn FS; Ung MH; Lou SK; Cheng C
    BMC Med Genomics; 2015 Mar; 8():11. PubMed ID: 25881247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multi-omics facilitated variable selection in Cox-regression model for cancer prognosis prediction.
    Liu C; Wang X; Genchev GZ; Lu H
    Methods; 2017 Jul; 124():100-107. PubMed ID: 28627406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel gene signature based on five glioblastoma stem-like cell relevant genes predicts the survival of primary glioblastoma.
    Chai R; Zhang K; Wang K; Li G; Huang R; Zhao Z; Liu Y; Chen J
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2018 Mar; 144(3):439-447. PubMed ID: 29299749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cancer survival classification using integrated data sets and intermediate information.
    Kim S; Park T; Kon M
    Artif Intell Med; 2014 Sep; 62(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 24997860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting censored survival data based on the interactions between meta-dimensional omics data in breast cancer.
    Kim D; Li R; Dudek SM; Ritchie MD
    J Biomed Inform; 2015 Aug; 56():220-8. PubMed ID: 26048077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fuzzy logic selection as a new reliable tool to identify molecular grade signatures in breast cancer--the INNODIAG study.
    Kempowsky-Hamon T; Valle C; Lacroix-Triki M; Hedjazi L; Trouilh L; Lamarre S; Labourdette D; Roger L; Mhamdi L; Dalenc F; Filleron T; Favre G; François JM; Le Lann MV; Anton-Leberre V
    BMC Med Genomics; 2015 Feb; 8():3. PubMed ID: 25888889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Classification of colon cancer based on the expression of randomly selected genes.
    Tan XH; Cheng R; Hu HP; Bai YP
    Genet Mol Res; 2015 Oct; 14(4):12628-35. PubMed ID: 26505413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An entropy-based gene selection method for cancer classification using microarray data.
    Liu X; Krishnan A; Mondry A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 6():76. PubMed ID: 15790388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A long non-coding RNA signature in glioblastoma multiforme predicts survival.
    Zhang XQ; Sun S; Lam KF; Kiang KM; Pu JK; Ho AS; Lui WM; Fung CF; Wong TS; Leung GK
    Neurobiol Dis; 2013 Oct; 58():123-31. PubMed ID: 23726844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Joint analysis of two microarray gene-expression data sets to select lung adenocarcinoma marker genes.
    Jiang H; Deng Y; Chen HS; Tao L; Sha Q; Chen J; Tsai CJ; Zhang S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Jun; 5():81. PubMed ID: 15217521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of gene importance in microarray data based upon probability of selection.
    Fu LM; Fu-Liu CS
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 6():67. PubMed ID: 15784140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Co-expression Network Analysis Identified COL8A1 Is Associated with the Progression and Prognosis in Human Colon Adenocarcinoma.
    Shang J; Wang F; Chen P; Wang X; Ding F; Liu S; Zhao Q
    Dig Dis Sci; 2018 May; 63(5):1219-1228. PubMed ID: 29497907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comprehensive genomic pan-cancer classification using The Cancer Genome Atlas gene expression data.
    Li Y; Kang K; Krahn JM; Croutwater N; Lee K; Umbach DM; Li L
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):508. PubMed ID: 28673244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of hub genes and regulatory factors of glioblastoma multiforme subgroups by RNA-seq data analysis.
    Li Y; Min W; Li M; Han G; Dai D; Zhang L; Chen X; Wang X; Zhang Y; Yue Z; Liu J
    Int J Mol Med; 2016 Oct; 38(4):1170-8. PubMed ID: 27572852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictors of breast cancer cell types and their prognostic power in breast cancer patients.
    Wang F; Dohogne Z; Yang J; Liu Y; Soibam B
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Feb; 19(1):137. PubMed ID: 29433432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Co-expression of mitosis-regulating genes contributes to malignant progression and prognosis in oligodendrogliomas.
    Liu Y; Hu H; Zhang C; Wang H; Zhang W; Wang Z; Li M; Zhang W; Zhou D; Jiang T
    Oncotarget; 2015 Nov; 6(35):38257-69. PubMed ID: 26468983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Removing the association of random gene sets and survival time in cancers with positive random bias using fixed-point gene set.
    Maghsoudi M; Aghdam R; Eslahchi C
    Sci Rep; 2023 May; 13(1):8663. PubMed ID: 37248269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.