192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29472093)
1. Image quality for radiotherapy CT simulators with different scanner bore size.
Tomic N; Papaconstadopoulos P; Aldelaijan S; Rajala J; Seuntjens J; Devic S
Phys Med; 2018 Jan; 45():65-71. PubMed ID: 29472093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance evaluation of an 85-cm-bore X-ray computed tomography scanner designed for radiation oncology and comparison with current diagnostic CT scanners.
Garcia-Ramirez JL; Mutic S; Dempsey JF; Low DA; Purdy JA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Mar; 52(4):1123-31. PubMed ID: 11958910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of Image Quality and Dosimetric Performance of CT Simulators.
Rezaee M; Letourneau D
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2019 Jun; 50(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 31176438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of the variation in CT scanner performance (image quality and Hounsfield units) with scan parameters, for image optimisation in radiotherapy treatment planning.
Davis AT; Palmer AL; Pani S; Nisbet A
Phys Med; 2018 Jan; 45():59-64. PubMed ID: 29472091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Image quality of conventional images of dual-layer SPECTRAL CT: A phantom study.
van Ommen F; Bennink E; Vlassenbroek A; Dankbaar JW; Schilham AMR; Viergever MA; de Jong HWAM
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3031-3042. PubMed ID: 29749624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Technical assessment of a mobile CT scanner for image-guided brachytherapy.
Chernavsky NE; Morcos M; Wu P; Viswanathan AN; Siewerdsen JH
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 20(10):187-200. PubMed ID: 31578811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of a commercial hybrid iterative and model-based reconstruction algorithm in radiation oncology.
Price RG; Vance S; Cattaneo R; Schultz L; Elshaikh MA; Chetty IJ; Glide-Hurst CK
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081907. PubMed ID: 25086538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 100 days with scans of the same Catphan phantom on the same CT scanner.
Husby E; Svendsen ED; Andersen HK; Martinsen ACT
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):224-231. PubMed ID: 28921910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of image quality from three CT simulation scanners.
McCann C; Alasti H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2004; 5(4):55-70. PubMed ID: 15738921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characteristics and clinical application of a treatment simulator with Ct-option.
Verellen D; Vinh-Hung V; Bijdekerke P; Nijs F; Linthout N; Bel A; Storme G
Radiother Oncol; 1999 Mar; 50(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 10392823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric impact of image artifact from a wide-bore CT scanner in radiotherapy treatment planning.
Wu V; Podgorsak MB; Tran TA; Malhotra HK; Wang IZ
Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4451-63. PubMed ID: 21859046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved image quality of cone beam CT scans for radiotherapy image guidance using fiber-interspaced antiscatter grid.
Stankovic U; van Herk M; Ploeger LS; Sonke JJ
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061910. PubMed ID: 24877821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Specific recommendations for accurate and direct use of PET-CT in PET guided radiotherapy for head and neck sites.
Thomas CM; Pike LC; Hartill CE; Baker S; Woods E; Convery DJ; Greener AG
Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):041710. PubMed ID: 24694130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A quantitative image quality comparison of four different image guided radiotherapy devices.
Stützel J; Oelfke U; Nill S
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jan; 86(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 18031854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technical assessment of a cone-beam CT scanner for otolaryngology imaging: image quality, dose, and technique protocols.
Xu J; Reh DD; Carey JP; Mahesh M; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4932-42. PubMed ID: 22894419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.
Lavely WC; Scarfone C; Cevikalp H; Li R; Byrne DW; Cmelak AJ; Dawant B; Price RR; Hallahan DE; Fitzpatrick JM
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 15191296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Utilizing a simple CT dosimetry phantom for the comprehension of the operational characteristics of CT AEC systems.
Tsalafoutas IA; Varsamidis A; Thalassinou S; Efstathopoulos EP
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111918. PubMed ID: 24320451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incorporating multislice imaging into x-ray CT polymer gel dosimetry.
Johnston H; Hilts M; Jirasek A
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1666-77. PubMed ID: 25832056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of image quality and dose calculation accuracy on kV CBCT, MV CBCT, and MV CT images for urgent palliative radiotherapy treatments.
Held M; Cremers F; Sneed PK; Braunstein S; Fogh SE; Nakamura J; Barani I; Perez-Andujar A; Pouliot J; Morin O
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):279-290. PubMed ID: 27074487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
