These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29472149)

  • 41. Cepstral analysis of normal and pathological voice in Spanish adults. Smoothed cepstral peak prominence in sustained vowels versus connected speech.
    Delgado-Hernández J; León-Gómez NM; Izquierdo-Arteaga LM; Llanos-Fumero Y
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2018; 69(3):134-140. PubMed ID: 28867553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Assessment of dysphonia: cepstral analysis versus conventional acoustic analysis.
    Hassan EM; Abdel Hady AF; Shohdi SS; Eldessouky HM; Din MHB
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2021 Oct; 46(3):99-109. PubMed ID: 32436465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Perceptual, Aerodynamic and Acoustic Evaluation of Vocal Characteristics in Subjects With Obesity.
    Munjal S; Sharma A; Chhabra N; Panda N
    J Voice; 2024 May; 38(3):660-665. PubMed ID: 34969555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Phonation Quotient Using Three Aerodynamic Instruments in the Disordered Voice.
    Joshi A; Watts CR; Hathway J
    J Voice; 2020 Jan; 34(1):20-24. PubMed ID: 30172672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Exploring the relationship between spectral and cepstral measures of voice and the Voice Handicap Index (VHI).
    Awan SN; Roy N; Cohen SM
    J Voice; 2014 Jul; 28(4):430-9. PubMed ID: 24698884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effects of vocal intensity and vowel type on cepstral analysis of voice.
    Awan SN; Giovinco A; Owens J
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):670.e15-20. PubMed ID: 22480754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The Impact of Nasalance on Cepstral Peak Prominence and Harmonics-to-Noise Ratio.
    Madill C; Nguyen DD; Yick-Ning Cham K; Novakovic D; McCabe P
    Laryngoscope; 2019 Aug; 129(8):E299-E304. PubMed ID: 30585334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Cepstral Peak Prominence Values for Clinical Voice Evaluation.
    Murton O; Hillman R; Mehta D
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2020 Aug; 29(3):1596-1607. PubMed ID: 32658592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An Efficacy Study of Voice Quality Using Cepstral Analyses of Phonation in Parkinson's Disease before and after SPEAK-OUT!®.
    Boutsen FR; Park E; Dvorak JD
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2023; 75(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 35817007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Spectral- and cepstral-based acoustic features of dysphonic, strained voice quality.
    Lowell SY; Kelley RT; Awan SN; Colton RH; Chan NH
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2012 Aug; 121(8):539-48. PubMed ID: 22953661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Objective acoustic and aerodynamic measures of breathiness in paralytic dysphonia.
    Hartl DA; Hans S; Vaissière J; Brasnu DA
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2003 Apr; 260(4):175-82. PubMed ID: 12709799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Toward validation of the cepstral spectral index of dysphonia (CSID) as an objective treatment outcomes measure.
    Peterson EA; Roy N; Awan SN; Merrill RM; Banks R; Tanner K
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 23809565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. An iOS-based Cepstral Peak Prominence Application: Feasibility for Patient Practice of Resonant Voice.
    van Leer E; Pfister RC; Zhou X
    J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):131.e9-131.e16. PubMed ID: 26846543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Voice Therapy Improves Acoustic and Auditory-Perceptual Outcomes in Children.
    Fujiki RB; Braden M; Thibeault SL
    Laryngoscope; 2023 Apr; 133(4):977-983. PubMed ID: 35754165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The influence of pitch and loudness changes on the acoustics of vocal tremor.
    Dromey C; Warrick P; Irish J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Oct; 45(5):879-90. PubMed ID: 12381046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of acoustic and electroglottographic parameters with different sustained vowels.
    Yılmaz G; Cangi ME; Yelken K
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2022 Dec; 47(4):284-291. PubMed ID: 34519593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Acoustic analysis of four common voice diagnoses: moving toward disorder-specific assessment.
    Gillespie AI; Dastolfo C; Magid N; Gartner-Schmidt J
    J Voice; 2014 Sep; 28(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 24880672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Predicting Voice Disorder Status From Smoothed Measures of Cepstral Peak Prominence Using Praat and Analysis of Dysphonia in Speech and Voice (ADSV).
    Sauder C; Bretl M; Eadie T
    J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):557-566. PubMed ID: 28169094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Perceptual-auditory and Acoustic Analysis of Air Traffic Controllers' Voices Pre- and Postshift.
    Villar AC; Korn GP; Azevedo RR
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):768.e11-768.e15. PubMed ID: 26778327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effects of Fundamental Frequency, Vocal Intensity, Sample Duration, and Vowel Context in Cepstral and Spectral Measures of Dysphonic Voices.
    Sampaio M; Vaz Masson ML; de Paula Soares MF; Bohlender JE; Brockmann-Bauser M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 May; 63(5):1326-1339. PubMed ID: 32348195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.