These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29473970)

  • 1. Feasibility of Activation Energy Prediction of Gas-Phase Reactions by Machine Learning.
    Choi S; Kim Y; Kim JW; Kim Z; Kim WY
    Chemistry; 2018 Aug; 24(47):12354-12358. PubMed ID: 29473970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Machine learning prediction of interaction energies in rigid water clusters.
    Bose S; Dhawan D; Nandi S; Sarkar RR; Ghosh D
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2018 Sep; 20(35):22987-22996. PubMed ID: 30156235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting Molecular Energy Using Force-Field Optimized Geometries and Atomic Vector Representations Learned from an Improved Deep Tensor Neural Network.
    Lu J; Wang C; Zhang Y
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Jul; 15(7):4113-4121. PubMed ID: 31142110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Support vector machine regression (LS-SVM)--an alternative to artificial neural networks (ANNs) for the analysis of quantum chemistry data?
    Balabin RM; Lomakina EI
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2011 Jun; 13(24):11710-8. PubMed ID: 21594265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New model for prediction binary mixture of antihistamine decongestant using artificial neural networks and least squares support vector machine by spectrophotometry method.
    Mofavvaz S; Sohrabi MR; Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A
    Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc; 2017 Jul; 182():105-115. PubMed ID: 28412664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In Silico Calculation of Infinite Dilution Activity Coefficients of Molecular Solutes in Ionic Liquids: Critical Review of Current Methods and New Models Based on Three Machine Learning Algorithms.
    Paduszyński K
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Aug; 56(8):1420-37. PubMed ID: 27384248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. FCHL revisited: Faster and more accurate quantum machine learning.
    Christensen AS; Bratholm LA; Faber FA; Anatole von Lilienfeld O
    J Chem Phys; 2020 Jan; 152(4):044107. PubMed ID: 32007071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fast and accurate modeling of molecular atomization energies with machine learning.
    Rupp M; Tkatchenko A; Müller KR; von Lilienfeld OA
    Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Feb; 108(5):058301. PubMed ID: 22400967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Machine Learning Using Combined Structural and Chemical Descriptors for Prediction of Methane Adsorption Performance of Metal Organic Frameworks (MOFs).
    Pardakhti M; Moharreri E; Wanik D; Suib SL; Srivastava R
    ACS Comb Sci; 2017 Oct; 19(10):640-645. PubMed ID: 28800219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Very short-term reactive forecasting of the solar ultraviolet index using an extreme learning machine integrated with the solar zenith angle.
    Deo RC; Downs N; Parisi AV; Adamowski JF; Quilty JM
    Environ Res; 2017 May; 155():141-166. PubMed ID: 28222363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Data-driven machine learning model for the prediction of oxygen vacancy formation energy of metal oxide materials.
    Wan Z; Wang QD; Liu D; Liang J
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2021 Jul; 23(29):15675-15684. PubMed ID: 34269780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment and Validation of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Molecular Atomization Energies.
    Hansen K; Montavon G; Biegler F; Fazli S; Rupp M; Scheffler M; von Lilienfeld OA; Tkatchenko A; Müller KR
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2013 Aug; 9(8):3404-19. PubMed ID: 26584096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Seminal quality prediction using data mining methods.
    Sahoo AJ; Kumar Y
    Technol Health Care; 2014; 22(4):531-45. PubMed ID: 24898862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Machine Learning Prediction of Nine Molecular Properties Based on the SMILES Representation of the QM9 Quantum-Chemistry Dataset.
    Pinheiro GA; Mucelini J; Soares MD; Prati RC; Da Silva JLF; Quiles MG
    J Phys Chem A; 2020 Nov; 124(47):9854-9866. PubMed ID: 33174750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Machine learning meets mechanistic modelling for accurate prediction of experimental activation energies.
    Jorner K; Brinck T; Norrby PO; Buttar D
    Chem Sci; 2021 Jan; 12(3):1163-1175. PubMed ID: 36299676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Constant size descriptors for accurate machine learning models of molecular properties.
    Collins CR; Gordon GJ; von Lilienfeld OA; Yaron DJ
    J Chem Phys; 2018 Jun; 148(24):241718. PubMed ID: 29960361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of Symmetry Functions to Large Chemical Spaces Using a Convolutional Neural Network.
    Selvaratnam B; Koodali RT; Miró P
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Apr; 60(4):1928-1935. PubMed ID: 32053367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. BonDNet: a graph neural network for the prediction of bond dissociation energies for charged molecules.
    Wen M; Blau SM; Spotte-Smith EWC; Dwaraknath S; Persson KA
    Chem Sci; 2020 Dec; 12(5):1858-1868. PubMed ID: 34163950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Novel QSPR Model for Prediction of Gas to Dimethyl Sulfoxide Solvation Enthalpy of Organic Compounds Based on Support Vector Machine.
    Golmohammadi H; Dashtbozorgi Z; Acree WE
    Mol Inform; 2012 May; 31(5):385-97. PubMed ID: 27477267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computational Screening of Metal⁻Organic Framework Membranes for the Separation of 15 Gas Mixtures.
    Yang W; Liang H; Peng F; Liu Z; Liu J; Qiao Z
    Nanomaterials (Basel); 2019 Mar; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 30897779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.