These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29474278)
1. Operating Room Efficiency: Examining the Impact of Personnel Handoffs. Geynisman-Tan J; Brown O; Mueller M; Bochenska K; Collins S; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Kenton K Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(2):87-89. PubMed ID: 29474278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the Impact of Intraoperative Surgical Team Handoffs on Patient Outcomes. Giugale LE; Sears S; Lavelle ES; Carter-Brooks CM; Bonidie M; Shepherd JP Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(5):288-292. PubMed ID: 28106651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse. Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial. Mueller ER; Kenton K; Anger JT; Bresee C; Tarnay C J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):917-21. PubMed ID: 27180224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes in 450 Women After Minimally Invasive Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Mueller MG; Jacobs KM; Mueller ER; Abernethy MG; Kenton KS Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 27054799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of surgical start time in patients undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Jallad K; Barber MD; Ridgeway B; Paraiso MF; Unger CA Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1535-9. PubMed ID: 27026142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of fellowship surgical training on operative time and patient morbidity during robotics-assisted sacrocolpopexy. Carter-Brooks CM; Du AL; Bonidie MJ; Shepherd JP Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Sep; 29(9):1317-1323. PubMed ID: 28889173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-Term Effectiveness of Uterosacral Colpopexy and Minimally Invasive Sacral Colpopexy for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Unger CA; Barber MD; Walters MD; Paraiso MFR; Ridgeway B; Jelovsek JE Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(3):188-194. PubMed ID: 27636212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive apical sacropexy: a retrospective review of laparoscopic and robotic operating room experiences. Pulliam SJ; Weinstein MM; Wakamatsu MM Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 22453324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lack of association between intraoperative handoff of care and postoperative complications: a retrospective observational study. O'Reilly-Shah VN; Melanson VG; Sullivan CL; Jabaley CS; Lynde GC BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Oct; 19(1):182. PubMed ID: 31615410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive surgery in urogynecology: a comparison of standard laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic, percutaneous surgical system, and robotic sacral colpopexy. Panico G; Campagna G; Vacca L; Caramazza D; Iannone V; Rossitto C; Rumolo V; Scambia G; Ercoli A Minerva Med; 2021 Aug; 112(4):483-491. PubMed ID: 32272829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perioperative complications and short-term outcomes of abdominal sacrocolpopexy, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, and laparoscopic pectopexy for apical prolapse. Biler A; Ertas IE; Tosun G; Hortu I; Turkay U; Gultekin OE; Igci G Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(5):996-1004. PubMed ID: 30044591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Partially Structured Postoperative Handoff Protocol Improves Communication in 2 Mixed Surgical Intensive Care Units: Findings From the Handoffs and Transitions in Critical Care (HATRICC) Prospective Cohort Study. Lane-Fall MB; Pascual JL; Peifer HG; Di Taranti LJ; Collard ML; Jablonski J; Gutsche JT; Halpern SD; Barg FK; Fleisher LA; Ann Surg; 2020 Mar; 271(3):484-493. PubMed ID: 30499797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy. Dubinskaya A; Hernandez-Aranda D; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 31256223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Impact of Obesity on Intraoperative Complications and Prolapse Recurrence After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy. Turner L; Lavelle E; Lowder JL; Shepherd JP Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(5):317-23. PubMed ID: 27054791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Leveraging Telemedicine Infrastructure to Monitor Quality of Operating Room to Intensive Care Unit Handoffs. Barry ME; Hochman BR; Lane-Fall MB; Zappile D; Holena DN; Smith BP; Kaplan LJ; Huffenberger A; Reilly PM; Pascual JL Acad Med; 2017 Jul; 92(7):1035-1042. PubMed ID: 28198723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Safety and Feasibility of Gynecologic Cancer Surgery Combined With Surgery for Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. McConnell NJ; Stewart JR; Martin A; Gaskins JT; Medlin EE Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Sep; 26(9):563-569. PubMed ID: 30362993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Developing a Standard Handoff Process for Operating Room-to-ICU Transitions: Multidisciplinary Clinician Perspectives from the Handoffs and Transitions in Critical Care (HATRICC) Study. Lane-Fall MB; Pascual JL; Massa S; Collard ML; Peifer HG; Di Taranti LJ; Linehan M; Fleisher LA; Barg FK Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2018 Sep; 44(9):514-525. PubMed ID: 30166035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic or laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus open sacrohysteropexy for uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapse. Paek J; Lee M; Kim BW; Kwon Y Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Apr; 27(4):593-9. PubMed ID: 26514118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]