249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29474282)
1. Online Physician Reviews in Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery: What Do Patients Really Want?
Asanad K; Parameshwar PS; Houman J; Spiegel BM; Daskivich TJ; Anger JT
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(2):109-114. PubMed ID: 29474282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Dermatology Practice Online Reviews: Lessons From Qualitative Analysis.
Smith RJ; Lipoff JB
JAMA Dermatol; 2016 Feb; 152(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 26606326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Understanding Your Online Ratings: A Methodological Analysis Using Urogynecologists in the United States.
Huber SA; Priestley J; Kasabwala K; Gadidov B; Culligan P
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):193-197. PubMed ID: 30807427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How do physician demographics, training, social media usage, online presence, and wait times influence online physician review scores for spine surgeons?
Donnally CJ; McCormick JR; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Barker GP; Rush AJ; Wang MY
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 30(2):279-288. PubMed ID: 30497169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing patient satisfaction among ABHRS surgeons: Opportunities to improve.
Hakimi AA; Yasmeh JP; Foulad DS
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2020 Feb; 19(2):462-465. PubMed ID: 31134743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How social media, training, and demographics influence online reviews across three leading review websites for spine surgeons.
Donnally CJ; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Roth ES; Barker GP; McCormick JR; Rush AJ; Lebwohl NH
Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2081-2090. PubMed ID: 29709552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Online ratings of orthopedic surgeons: analysis of 2185 reviews.
Bakhsh W; Mesfin A
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2014 Aug; 43(8):359-63. PubMed ID: 25136868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chronic Pain Practices: An Evaluation of Positive and Negative Online Patient Reviews.
Orhurhu MS; Salisu B; Sottosanti E; Abimbola N; Urits I; Jones M; Viswanath O; Kaye AD; Simopoulos T; Orhurhu V
Pain Physician; 2019 Sep; 22(5):E477-E486. PubMed ID: 31561660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The development of online doctor reviews in China: an analysis of the largest online doctor review website in China.
Hao H
J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jun; 17(6):e134. PubMed ID: 26032933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A website to improve asthma care by suggesting patient questions for physicians: qualitative analysis of user experiences.
Hartmann CW; Sciamanna CN; Blanch DC; Mui S; Lawless H; Manocchia M; Rosen RK; Pietropaoli A
J Med Internet Res; 2007 Feb; 9(1):e3. PubMed ID: 17478412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does experience matter? A meta-analysis of physician rating websites of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
Jack RA; Burn MB; McCulloch PC; Liberman SR; Varner KE; Harris JD
Musculoskelet Surg; 2018 Apr; 102(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 28853024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Online Patient Ratings of Hand Surgeons.
Trehan SK; DeFrancesco CJ; Nguyen JT; Charalel RA; Daluiski A
J Hand Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 41(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 26710742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patients' Online Perception and Ratings of Neurotologists.
Goshtasbi K; Lehrich BM; Moshtaghi O; Abouzari M; Sahyouni R; Bagheri K; Moshtaghi A; Tajran SD; Lee L; Lin HW; Djalilian HR
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jan; 40(1):139-143. PubMed ID: 30531643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Association of Social Media Presence with Online Physician Ratings and Surgical Volume Among California Urologists: Observational Study.
Houman J; Weinberger J; Caron A; Hannemann A; Zaliznyak M; Patel D; Moradzadeh A; Daskivich TJ
J Med Internet Res; 2019 Aug; 21(8):e10195. PubMed ID: 31411141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Web-Based Physician Ratings for California Physicians on Probation.
Murphy GP; Awad MA; Osterberg EC; Gaither TW; Chumnarnsongkhroh T; Washington SL; Breyer BN
J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e254. PubMed ID: 28830852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Provider-Initiated Patient Satisfaction Reporting Yields Improved Physician Ratings Relative to Online Rating Websites.
Ricciardi BF; Waddell BS; Nodzo SR; Lange J; Nocon AA; Amundsen S; Tarity TD; McLawhorn AS
Orthopedics; 2017 Sep; 40(5):304-310. PubMed ID: 28817163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of Surgeon Gender on Online Physician Reviews.
Marrero K; King E; Fingeret AL
J Surg Res; 2020 Jan; 245():510-515. PubMed ID: 31446193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Online reviews of 500 urologists.
Ellimoottil C; Hart A; Greco K; Quek ML; Farooq A
J Urol; 2013 Jun; 189(6):2269-73. PubMed ID: 23228385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Insights into the impact of online physician reviews on patients' decision making: randomized experiment.
Grabner-Kräuter S; Waiguny MK
J Med Internet Res; 2015 Apr; 17(4):e93. PubMed ID: 25862516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Online physician review websites poorly correlate to a validated metric of patient satisfaction.
Chen J; Presson A; Zhang C; Ray D; Finlayson S; Glasgow R
J Surg Res; 2018 Jul; 227():1-6. PubMed ID: 29804840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
