These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

577 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29474843)

  • 1. Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
    Zaki MN; Wing DA; McNulty JA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 29474843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cesarean wound closure in body mass index 40 or greater comparing suture to staples: a randomized clinical trial.
    Rodel RL; Gray KM; Quiner TE; Bodea Braescu A; Gerkin R; Perlow JH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jan; 3(1):100271. PubMed ID: 33451603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wound complications in obese women after cesarean: a comparison of staples versus subcuticular suture.
    Zaki MN; Truong M; Pyra M; Kominiarek MA; Irwin T
    J Perinatol; 2016 Oct; 36(10):819-22. PubMed ID: 27253895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does Time of Wound Complication after Cesarean Delivery Differ by Type of Skin Closure?
    Cooper SM; Blanchard CT; Szychowski JM; Tita ATN
    Am J Perinatol; 2019 Jul; 36(9):981-984. PubMed ID: 30477032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Staples versus subcuticular suture for cesarean skin closure in obese women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Han D; Feng L; Xu L; Li C; Zhang Q
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Oct; 51(8):102420. PubMed ID: 35688324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Figueroa D; Jauk VC; Szychowski JM; Garner R; Biggio JR; Andrews WW; Hauth J; Tita AT
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 121(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23262925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of suture materials for subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery.
    Tuuli MG; Stout MJ; Martin S; Rampersad RM; Cahill AG; Macones GA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):490.e1-5. PubMed ID: 27179440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of evidence-based interventions on wound complications after cesarean delivery.
    Temming LA; Raghuraman N; Carter EB; Stout MJ; Rampersad RM; Macones GA; Cahill AG; Tuuli MG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):449.e1-449.e9. PubMed ID: 28601567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis.
    Mackeen AD; Schuster M; Berghella V
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):621.e1-10. PubMed ID: 25530592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery.
    Basha SL; Rochon ML; Quiñones JN; Coassolo KM; Rust OA; Smulian JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 203(3):285.e1-8. PubMed ID: 20816153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incidence of wound complications in cesarean deliveries following closure with absorbable subcuticular staples versus conventional skin closure techniques.
    Schrufer-Poland TL; Ruiz MP; Kassar S; Tomassian C; Algren SD; Yeast JD
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Nov; 206():53-56. PubMed ID: 27632411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wound Complication Rates After Staples or Suture for Midline Vertical Skin Closure in Obese Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Kuroki LM; Mullen MM; Massad LS; Wu N; Liu J; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Hagemann AR; Thaker PH; McCourt CK; Novetsky AP
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 130(1):91-99. PubMed ID: 28594761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial.
    Madsen AM; Dow ML; Lohse CM; Tessmer-Tuck JA
    BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 30461155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome in a randomized study of cesarean skin closure.
    Fleisher J; Khalifeh A; Pettker C; Berghella V; Dabbish N; Mackeen AD
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(22):3830-3835. PubMed ID: 29739243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic outcome after skin closure with 'staples' or 'subcuticular sutures' in emergency cesarean section.
    Sharma C; Verma A; Soni A; Thusoo M; Mahajan VK; Verma S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Oct; 290(4):655-9. PubMed ID: 24816689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis.
    Wang H; Hong S; Teng H; Qiao L; Yin H
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(22):3705-11. PubMed ID: 26785886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Superficial incisional surgical site infection rate after cesarean section in obese women: a randomized controlled trial of subcuticular versus interrupted skin suturing.
    Ibrahim MI; Moustafa GF; Al-Hamid AS; Hussein MR
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 May; 289(5):981-6. PubMed ID: 24272023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures.
    Rousseau JA; Girard K; Turcot-Lemay L; Thomas N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 200(3):265.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19254586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wound morbidity with staples compared with suture for cesarean skin closure by diabetic status.
    Fitzwater JL; Jauk VC; Figueroa D; Biggio JR; Andrews WW; Tita AT
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 25567558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery with poliglecaprone-25 vs polyglactin-910: a randomized controlled trial.
    Sharma C; Sharma S; Soni A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Feb; 6(2):101256. PubMed ID: 38109995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.