90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29474862)
1. Patterns and effects of GC3 heterogeneity and parsimony informative sites on the phylogenetic tree of genes.
Ma S; Wu Q; Hu Y; Wei F
Gene; 2018 May; 655():56-60. PubMed ID: 29474862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Less is more in mammalian phylogenomics: AT-rich genes minimize tree conflicts and unravel the root of placental mammals.
Romiguier J; Ranwez V; Delsuc F; Galtier N; Douzery EJ
Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Sep; 30(9):2134-44. PubMed ID: 23813978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Phylogenetic affinity of tree shrews to Glires is attributed to fast evolution rate.
Lin J; Chen G; Gu L; Shen Y; Zheng M; Zheng W; Hu X; Zhang X; Qiu Y; Liu X; Jiang C
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 Feb; 71():193-200. PubMed ID: 24333622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the relationship between evolutionary divergence and phylogenetic accuracy in AFLP data sets.
García-Pereira MJ; Caballero A; Quesada H
Mol Biol Evol; 2010 May; 27(5):988-1000. PubMed ID: 20026482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biased gene conversion and GC-content evolution in the coding sequences of reptiles and vertebrates.
Figuet E; Ballenghien M; Romiguier J; Galtier N
Genome Biol Evol; 2014 Dec; 7(1):240-50. PubMed ID: 25527834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The serine repeat antigen (SERA) gene family phylogeny in Plasmodium: the impact of GC content and reconciliation of gene and species trees.
Bourgon R; Delorenzi M; Sargeant T; Hodder AN; Crabb BS; Speed TP
Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Nov; 21(11):2161-71. PubMed ID: 15306658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of phylogeny and codon usage bias and relationship of GC content, amino acid composition with expression of the structural nif genes.
Mondal SK; Kundu S; Das R; Roy S
J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2016 Aug; 34(8):1649-66. PubMed ID: 26309237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. GC3-biased gene domains in mammalian genomes.
Shen W; Wang D; Ye B; Shi M; Ma L; Zhang Y; Zhao Z
Bioinformatics; 2015 Oct; 31(19):3081-4. PubMed ID: 26019240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How can third codon positions outperform first and second codon positions in phylogenetic inference? An empirical example from the seed plants.
Simmons MP; Zhang LB; Webb CT; Reeves A
Syst Biol; 2006 Apr; 55(2):245-58. PubMed ID: 16551581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measuring inconsistency in phylogenetic trees.
Willson SJ
J Theor Biol; 1998 Jan; 190(1):15-36. PubMed ID: 9473388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phylogenomics Controlling for Base Compositional Bias Reveals a Single Origin of Eusociality in Corbiculate Bees.
Romiguier J; Cameron SA; Woodard SH; Fischman BJ; Keller L; Praz CJ
Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Mar; 33(3):670-8. PubMed ID: 26576851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of nucleotide composition bias on the success of the parsimony criterion in phylogenetic inference.
Conant GC; Lewis PO
Mol Biol Evol; 2001 Jun; 18(6):1024-33. PubMed ID: 11371591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maximum likelihood estimates of species trees: how accuracy of phylogenetic inference depends upon the divergence history and sampling design.
McCormack JE; Huang H; Knowles LL
Syst Biol; 2009 Oct; 58(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 20525604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maximum parsimony for tree mixtures.
Grünewald S; Moulton V
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2009; 6(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 19179702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The bimodal distribution of genic GC content is ancestral to monocot species.
Clément Y; Fustier MA; Nabholz B; Glémin S
Genome Biol Evol; 2014 Dec; 7(1):336-48. PubMed ID: 25527839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Genome-Scale Investigation of How Sequence, Function, and Tree-Based Gene Properties Influence Phylogenetic Inference.
Shen XX; Salichos L; Rokas A
Genome Biol Evol; 2016 Sep; 8(8):2565-80. PubMed ID: 27492233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bijective Diameters of Gene Tree Parsimony Costs.
Gorecki P; Eulenstein O
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2018; 15(5):1723-1727. PubMed ID: 28792904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Phylogenetic utility of rapidly evolving DNA at high taxonomical levels: contrasting matK, trnT-F, and rbcL in basal angiosperms.
Müller KF; Borsch T; Hilu KW
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2006 Oct; 41(1):99-117. PubMed ID: 16904914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny.
Russo CA; Takezaki N; Nei M
Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Mar; 13(3):525-36. PubMed ID: 8742641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inferring species phylogenies from multiple genes: concatenated sequence tree versus consensus gene tree.
Gadagkar SR; Rosenberg MS; Kumar S
J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol; 2005 Jan; 304(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 15593277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
