163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29475071)
1. Pre-clinical validation of a closed surface system (Cryotop SC) for the vitrification of oocytes and embryos in the mouse model.
Castelló D; Cobo A; Mestres E; Garcia M; Vanrell I; Alejandro Remohí J; Calderón G; Costa-Borges N
Cryobiology; 2018 Apr; 81():107-116. PubMed ID: 29475071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Embryo vitrification using a novel semi-automated closed system yields in vitro outcomes equivalent to the manual Cryotop method.
Roy TK; Brandi S; Tappe NM; Bradley CK; Vom E; Henderson C; Lewis C; Battista K; Hobbs B; Hobbs S; Syer J; Lanyon SR; Dopheide SM; Peura TT; McArthur SJ; Bowman MC; Stojanov T
Hum Reprod; 2014 Nov; 29(11):2431-8. PubMed ID: 25164022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new vitrification device that absorbs excess vitrification solution adaptable to a closed system for the cryopreservation of mouse embryos.
Momozawa K; Matsuzawa A; Tokunaga Y; Ohi N; Harada M
Cryobiology; 2019 Jun; 88():9-14. PubMed ID: 31034811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Cryotop and micro volume air cooling methods for cryopreservation of bovine matured oocytes and blastocysts.
Punyawai K; Anakkul N; Srirattana K; Aikawa Y; Sangsritavong S; Nagai T; Imai K; Parnpai R
J Reprod Dev; 2015; 61(5):431-7. PubMed ID: 26119929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Open versus closed oocyte vitrification in an oocyte donation programme: a prospective randomized sibling oocyte study.
De Munck N; Santos-Ribeiro S; Stoop D; Van de Velde H; Verheyen G
Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 26724798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of cryotop and solid surface vitrification methods for the cryopreservation of in vitro matured bovine oocytes.
Sripunya N; Somfai T; Inaba Y; Nagai T; Imai K; Parnpai R
J Reprod Dev; 2010 Feb; 56(1):176-81. PubMed ID: 19815985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Closed vitrification of human oocytes and blastocysts: outcomes from a series of clinical cases.
Gook DA; Choo B; Bourne H; Lewis K; Edgar DH
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Sep; 33(9):1247-52. PubMed ID: 27233650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficient vitrification of mouse embryos using the Kitasato Vitrification System as a novel vitrification device.
Momozawa K; Matsuzawa A; Tokunaga Y; Abe S; Koyanagi Y; Kurita M; Nakano M; Miyake T
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2017 Apr; 15(1):29. PubMed ID: 28438181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Closed carrier device: a reality to vitrify oocytes and embryos in aseptic conditions].
Vanderzwalmen P; Zech N; Prapas Y; Panagiotidis Y; Papatheodorou A; Lejeune B; Jareño D; Vanderzwalmen S; Ectors F
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2010 Sep; 38(9):541-6. PubMed ID: 20800527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of antifreeze proteins on the vitrification of mouse oocytes: comparison of three different antifreeze proteins.
Lee HH; Lee HJ; Kim HJ; Lee JH; Ko Y; Kim SM; Lee JR; Suh CS; Kim SH
Hum Reprod; 2015 Sep; 30(9):2110-9. PubMed ID: 26202918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination.
Kuwayama M; Vajta G; Ieda S; Kato O
Reprod Biomed Online; 2005 Nov; 11(5):608-14. PubMed ID: 16409712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of microSecure vitrification (μS-VTF) for the effective cryopreservation of human embryos and oocytes.
Schiewe MC; Zozula S; Anderson RE; Fahy GM
Cryobiology; 2015 Oct; 71(2):264-72. PubMed ID: 26210008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cryotops versus open-pulled straws (OPS) as carriers for the cryopreservation of bovine oocytes: effects on spindle and chromosome configuration and embryo development.
Morató R; Izquierdo D; Paramio MT; Mogas T
Cryobiology; 2008 Oct; 57(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 18680737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of two closed carriers for vitrification of human blastocysts in a donor program.
Guerrero J; Gallardo M; Rodríguez-Arnedo A; Ten J; Bernabeu R
Cryobiology; 2018 Apr; 81():12-16. PubMed ID: 29526605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vitrification of mouse embryos at 2-cell, 4-cell and 8-cell stages by cryotop method.
Zhang J; Cui J; Ling X; Li X; Peng Y; Guo X; Heng BC; Tong GQ
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2009; 26(11-12):621-8. PubMed ID: 19967554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New methods for cooling and storing oocytes and embryos in a clean environment of -196°C.
Arav A; Natan Y; Levi-Setti PE; Menduni F; Patrizio P
Reprod Biomed Online; 2016 Jul; 33(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 27131833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Thermal and clinical performance of a closed device designed for human oocyte vitrification based on the optimization of the warming rate.
Gallardo M; Hebles M; Migueles B; Dorado M; Aguilera L; González M; Piqueras P; Montero L; Sánchez-Martín P; Sánchez-Martín F; Risco R
Cryobiology; 2016 Aug; 73(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 27312427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A compact, high-throughput semi-automated embryo vitrification system based on hydrogel.
Wang S; Chen L; Fang J; Sun H
Reprod Biomed Online; 2024 May; 48(5):103769. PubMed ID: 38492415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of efficiency of open pulled straw (OPS) and Cryotop vitrification for cryopreservation of in vitro matured pig oocytes.
Liu Y; Du Y; Lin L; Li J; Kragh PM; Kuwayama M; Bolund L; Yang H; Vajta G
Cryo Letters; 2008; 29(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 19137194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [A prospective study to compare the efficiency of oocyte vitrification using closed or open devices].
Sarandi S; Herbemont C; Sermondade N; Benoit A; Sonigo C; Poncelet C; Benard J; Gronier H; Boujenah J; Grynberg M; Sifer C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2016 May; 44(5):280-4. PubMed ID: 26968255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
