These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29475756)

  • 41. Displacement of screw-retained splinted and nonsplinted restorations into implants with conical internal connections.
    Yilmaz B; Seidt JD; Clelland NL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(6):1289-92. PubMed ID: 25397792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of 3D displacements of screw-retained zirconia implant crowns into implants with different internal connections with respect to screw tightening.
    Rebeeah HA; Yilmaz B; Seidt JD; McGlumphy E; Clelland N; Brantley W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):132-137. PubMed ID: 28478991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Ensuring passivity and retrievability for immediate complete-arch implant-supported prostheses.
    Spazzin AO; Camargo B; Bacchi A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Feb; 117(2):214-217. PubMed ID: 27646800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The effect of load cycling on metal ceramic screw-retained implant restorations with unrestored and restored screw access holes.
    Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann MG; Heckmann SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 18182181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Clinical evaluation of an improved cementation technique for implant-supported restorations: a randomized controlled trial.
    Canullo L; Cocchetto R; Marinotti F; Oltra DP; Diago MP; Loi I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Dec; 27(12):1492-1499. PubMed ID: 25846254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Simplified fabrication of an implant-supported framework with luted abutment cylinders.
    Stumpel LJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 28024820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Abutment margin levels and residual cement occurrence in cement-retained implant restorations: An observational study.
    Kim HJ; Karasan D; Park K; Kwon HB; Han JS; Lee JH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Jan; 34(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 36278423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. In vitro performance of implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns: Influence of patient-specific tooth-coloured abutments with titanium adhesive bases.
    Rosentritt M; Rembs A; Behr M; Hahnel S; Preis V
    J Dent; 2015 Jul; 43(7):839-45. PubMed ID: 25953721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The influence of the emergence profile on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement-retained implant reconstructions.
    Sancho-Puchades M; Crameri D; Özcan M; Sailer I; Jung RE; Hämmerle CHF; Thoma DS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1515-1522. PubMed ID: 28407306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Cone beam computed tomographic evaluation of implants with platform-switched Morse taper connection with the implant-abutment interface at different levels in relation to the alveolar crest.
    Koutouzis T; Neiva R; Nair M; Nonhoff J; Lundgren T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1157-63. PubMed ID: 25216143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The influence of the cementation margin position on the amount of undetected cement. A prospective clinical study.
    Linkevicius T; Vindasiute E; Puisys A; Linkeviciene L; Maslova N; Puriene A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jan; 24(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 22487018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Current status of implant-abutment--part 1: abutments for cemented versus screw retained restorations].
    Harel N; Livne S; Piek D; Marku-Cohen S; Ormianer Z
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2012 Jan; 29(1):19-25, 63. PubMed ID: 22991873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.
    Di Felice R; Rappelli G; Camaioni E; Cattani M; Meyer JM; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 17224031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Cement selection for cement-retained crown technique with dental implants.
    Sheets JL; Wilcox C; Wilwerding T
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):92-96. PubMed ID: 17971122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Three-dimensional image correlation analyses for strains generated by cement and screw-retained implant prostheses.
    Clelland NL; Yilmaz B; Seidt JD
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):271-82. PubMed ID: 22171595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Photoelastic analysis of stresses transmitted by universal cast to long abutment on implant-supported single restorations under static occlusal loads.
    Aguiar FA; Tiossi R; Macedo AP; Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF; Rodrigues RC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(7 Suppl 1):2019-23. PubMed ID: 23154374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Alternative complete-arch cement-retained implant-supported fixed partial denture.
    Hofstede TM; Ercoli C; Hagan ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Jul; 82(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 10384169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
    Cano-Batalla J; Soliva-Garriga J; Campillo-Funollet M; Munoz-Viveros CA; Giner-Tarrida L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Strain analysis of 9 different abutments for cement-retained crowns on an internal hexagonal implant.
    Salaita LG; Yilmaz B; Seidt JD; Clelland NL; Chien HH; McGlumphy EA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Aug; 118(2):166-171. PubMed ID: 28126354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.