BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29476214)

  • 1. Comparison of ultrasound versus computed tomography for the detection of kidney stones in the pediatric population: a clinical effectiveness study.
    Roberson NP; Dillman JR; O'Hara SM; DeFoor WR; Reddy PP; Giordano RM; Trout AT
    Pediatr Radiol; 2018 Jul; 48(7):962-972. PubMed ID: 29476214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustic shadowing in pediatric kidney stone ultrasound: a retrospective study with non-enhanced computed tomography as reference standard.
    Verhagen MV; Watson TA; Hickson M; Smeulders N; Humphries PD
    Pediatr Radiol; 2019 May; 49(6):777-783. PubMed ID: 30868197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sonographic twinkling artifact for renal calculus detection: correlation with CT.
    Dillman JR; Kappil M; Weadock WJ; Rubin JM; Platt JF; DiPietro MA; Bude RO
    Radiology; 2011 Jun; 259(3):911-6. PubMed ID: 21460031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrasound versus computed tomography for the detection of ureteral calculi in the pediatric population: a clinical effectiveness study.
    Roberson NP; Dillman JR; Reddy PO; DeFoor W; Trout AT
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 May; 44(5):1858-1866. PubMed ID: 30756146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does twinkle artifact truly represent a kidney stone on renal ultrasound?
    Puttmann K; Dajusta D; Rehfuss AW
    J Pediatr Urol; 2021 Aug; 17(4):475.e1-475.e6. PubMed ID: 33867287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic radiologic detection of kidney stones in Canadian children: a new era of asymptomatic stones?
    Cassim R; Van Walraven C; Lavallée LT; McAlpine K; Highmore K; Leonard MP; Guerra L; Grandpierre V; Vethamuthu J; Keays MA
    J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Oct; 15(5):467.e1-467.e7. PubMed ID: 31235439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrasound accuracy in evaluating renal calculi in Maysan province.
    Abbas SK; Al-Omary TSS; Fawzi HA
    J Med Life; 2024 Feb; 17(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 38813369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of ultrasonography for renal stone detection and size determination: is it good enough for management decisions?
    Ganesan V; De S; Greene D; Torricelli FC; Monga M
    BJU Int; 2017 Mar; 119(3):464-469. PubMed ID: 27459091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Limitations to ultrasound in the detection and measurement of urinary tract calculi.
    Ray AA; Ghiculete D; Pace KT; Honey RJ
    Urology; 2010 Aug; 76(2):295-300. PubMed ID: 20206970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Utility of the Kidneys-ureters-bladder Radiograph as the Sole Imaging Modality and Its Combination With Ultrasonography for the Detection of Renal Stones.
    Kanno T; Kubota M; Funada S; Okada T; Higashi Y; Yamada H
    Urology; 2017 Jun; 104():40-44. PubMed ID: 28341578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrospective comparison of measured stone size and posterior acoustic shadow width in clinical ultrasound images.
    Dai JC; Dunmire B; Sternberg KM; Liu Z; Larson T; Thiel J; Chang HC; Harper JD; Bailey MR; Sorensen MD
    World J Urol; 2018 May; 36(5):727-732. PubMed ID: 29243111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of Renal Stones on Portal Venous Phase CT: Comparison of Thin Axial and Coronal Maximum-Intensity-Projection Images.
    Corwin MT; Lee JS; Fananapazir G; Wilson M; Lamba R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Dec; 207(6):1200-1204. PubMed ID: 27611106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. US for detecting renal calculi with nonenhanced CT as a reference standard.
    Fowler KA; Locken JA; Duchesne JH; Williamson MR
    Radiology; 2002 Jan; 222(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 11756713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The efficacy of ultrasonography for the detection of renal stone.
    Kanno T; Kubota M; Sakamoto H; Nishiyama R; Okada T; Higashi Y; Yamada H
    Urology; 2014 Aug; 84(2):285-8. PubMed ID: 24908592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Follow-up imaging after acute evaluations for pediatric nephrolithiasis: Trends from a National database.
    Ellison JS; Merguerian PA; Fu BC; Holt SK; Lendvay TS; Gore JL; Shnorhavorian M
    J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Dec; 14(6):525-531. PubMed ID: 29866410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Accuracy and Prognostic Value of Point-of-care Ultrasound for Nephrolithiasis in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Wong C; Teitge B; Ross M; Young P; Robertson HL; Lang E
    Acad Emerg Med; 2018 Jun; 25(6):684-698. PubMed ID: 29427476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Low-Dose (10%) Computed Tomography May Be Inferior to Standard-Dose CT in the Evaluation of Acute Renal Colic in the Emergency Room Setting.
    Malkawi IM; Han E; Atalla CS; Santucci RA; O'Neil B; Wynberg JB
    J Endourol; 2016 May; 30(5):493-6. PubMed ID: 26728321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of B-mode ultrasonography in the detection of urolithiasis in patients with acute renal colic.
    Haroun AA; Hadidy AM; Mithqal AM; Mahafza WS; Al-Riyalat NT; Sheikh-Ali RF
    Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl; 2010 May; 21(3):488-93. PubMed ID: 20427874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitivity of emergency bedside ultrasound to detect hydronephrosis in patients with computed tomography-proven stones.
    Riddell J; Case A; Wopat R; Beckham S; Lucas M; McClung CD; Swadron S
    West J Emerg Med; 2014 Feb; 15(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 24578772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in computed tomography density of the renal papillae of stone formers and non-stone-formers: a pilot study.
    Eisner BH; Iqbal A; Namasivayam S; Catalano O; Kambadakone A; Dretler SP; Sahani DV
    J Endourol; 2008 Oct; 22(10):2207-10. PubMed ID: 18831676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.