These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
679 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29476274)
1. Hysteropexy: an Option for the Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Bradley S; Gutman RE; Richter LA Curr Urol Rep; 2018 Feb; 19(2):15. PubMed ID: 29476274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Does hysterectomy modifies the anatomical and functional outcomes of prolapse surgery?: Clinical Practice Guidelines]. Cayrac M; Warembourg S; Le Normand L; Fatton B Prog Urol; 2016 Jul; 26 Suppl 1():S73-88. PubMed ID: 27595628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does the uterus need to be removed to correct uterovaginal prolapse? Gutman RE Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 28(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 27467823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Rogers RG; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Grey S; Sridhar A; Wallace D; JAMA; 2019 Sep; 322(11):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 31529008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Uterine-preserving POP surgery. Gutman R; Maher C Int Urogynecol J; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1803-13. PubMed ID: 24142056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characteristics associated with composite surgical failure over 5 years of women in a randomized trial of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension. Richter HE; Sridhar A; Nager CW; Komesu YM; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Rardin C; Visco A; Mazloomdoost D; Thomas S; Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 228(1):63.e1-63.e16. PubMed ID: 35931131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Maher C; Feiner B; Baessler K; Schmid C Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; (4):CD004014. PubMed ID: 23633316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial. Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Komesu Y; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Sridhar A; Thomas S; Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 225(2):153.e1-153.e31. PubMed ID: 33716071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Maher C; Yeung E; Haya N; Christmann-Schmid C; Mowat A; Chen Z; Baessler K Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Jul; 7(7):CD012376. PubMed ID: 37493538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study. Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial. Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines. Meriwether KV; Antosh DD; Olivera CK; Kim-Fine S; Balk EM; Murphy M; Grimes CL; Sleemi A; Singh R; Dieter AA; Crisp CC; Rahn DD Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):129-146.e2. PubMed ID: 29353031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of Hysteropexy in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Gan ZS; Roberson DS; Smith AL Curr Urol Rep; 2022 Sep; 23(9):175-183. PubMed ID: 35789456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study. Gutman RE; Rardin CR; Sokol ER; Matthews C; Park AJ; Iglesia CB; Geoffrion R; Sokol AI; Karram M; Cundiff GW; Blomquist JL; Barber MD Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11. PubMed ID: 27596620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Maher C; Feiner B; Baessler K; Christmann-Schmid C; Haya N; Brown J Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 10(10):CD012376. PubMed ID: 27696355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women. Geoffrion R; Larouche M J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Apr; 43(4):511-523.e1. PubMed ID: 33548503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sacrospinous hysteropexy: review and meta-analysis of outcomes. Kapoor S; Sivanesan K; Robertson JA; Veerasingham M; Kapoor V Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1285-1294. PubMed ID: 28258346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]