284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29476331)
1. How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression.
Wang B; Theeuwes J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 May; 80(4):860-870. PubMed ID: 29476331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Proactively location-based suppression elicited by statistical learning.
Kong S; Li X; Wang B; Theeuwes J
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0233544. PubMed ID: 32479531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy.
Wang B; Theeuwes J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1763-1774. PubMed ID: 29968080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Probability cueing of singleton-distractor locations in visual search: Priority-map- versus dimension-based inhibition?
Zhang B; Allenmark F; Liesefeld HR; Shi Z; Müller HJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1146-1163. PubMed ID: 31144860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implicitly learned suppression of irrelevant spatial locations.
Leber AB; Gwinn RE; Hong Y; O'Toole RJ
Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1873-1881. PubMed ID: 27225635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Independent effects of statistical learning and top-down attention.
Gao Y; Theeuwes J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Nov; 82(8):3895-3906. PubMed ID: 32909086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Distractor suppression leads to reduced flanker interference.
Ivanov Y; Theeuwes J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):624-636. PubMed ID: 33269439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Statistical regularities bias overt attention.
Wang B; Samara I; Theeuwes J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1813-1821. PubMed ID: 30919311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Proactive distractor suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search.
Huang C; Vilotijević A; Theeuwes J; Donk M
Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Jun; 28(3):918-927. PubMed ID: 33620698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering.
Ferrante O; Patacca A; Di Caro V; Della Libera C; Santandrea E; Chelazzi L
Cortex; 2018 May; 102():67-95. PubMed ID: 29096874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Role of Top-Down Focused Spatial Attention in Preattentive Salience Coding and Salience-based Attentional Capture.
Bertleff S; Fink GR; Weidner R
J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 28(8):1152-65. PubMed ID: 27054402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cueing distraction: electrophysiological evidence for anticipatory active suppression of distractor location.
Heuer A; Schubö A
Psychol Res; 2020 Nov; 84(8):2111-2121. PubMed ID: 31201532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Top-down attentional control for distractor locations: the benefit of precuing distractor locations on target localization and discrimination.
Chao HF
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):303-16. PubMed ID: 20364920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hidden from view: Statistical learning exposes latent attentional capture.
Hilchey MD; Pratt J
Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1633-1640. PubMed ID: 31152432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term (statistically learnt) and short-term (inter-trial) distractor-location effects arise at different pre- and post-selective processing stages.
Qiu N; Zhang B; Allenmark F; Nasemann J; Tsai SY; Müller HJ; Shi Z
Psychophysiology; 2023 Oct; 60(10):e14351. PubMed ID: 37277926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture.
Wang B; Theeuwes J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 29309194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implicit learning of spatiotemporal contingencies in spatial cueing.
Rieth CA; Huber DE
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):1165-80. PubMed ID: 23181686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Statistical learning in the absence of explicit top-down attention.
Duncan D; Theeuwes J
Cortex; 2020 Oct; 131():54-65. PubMed ID: 32801075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. More capture, more suppression: Distractor suppression due to statistical regularities is determined by the magnitude of attentional capture.
Failing M; Theeuwes J
Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Feb; 27(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 31848910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
