BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

722 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29476873)

  • 1. Exploring the switching of the focus of attention within working memory: A combined event-related potential and behavioral study.
    Frenken M; Berti S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Apr; 126():30-41. PubMed ID: 29476873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Object switching within working memory is reflected in the human event-related brain potential.
    Berti S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 434(2):200-5. PubMed ID: 18294773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Switching Attention Within Working Memory is Reflected in the P3a Component of the Human Event-Related Brain Potential.
    Berti S
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():701. PubMed ID: 26779009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the fate of non-cued mental representations in visuo-spatial working memory: Evidence by a retro-cuing paradigm.
    Schneider D; Mertes C; Wascher E
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 293():114-24. PubMed ID: 26196953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Filtering performance in visual working memory is improved by reducing early spatial attention to the distractors.
    Allon AS; Luria R
    Psychophysiology; 2019 May; 56(5):e13323. PubMed ID: 30609072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual differences in aging and cognitive control modulate the neural indexes of context updating and maintenance during task switching.
    Adrover-Roig D; Barceló F
    Cortex; 2010 Apr; 46(4):434-50. PubMed ID: 19889406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural Dynamics of Cognitive Control over Working Memory Capture of Attention.
    Whitehead PS; Ooi MM; Egner T; Woldorff MG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 31(7):1079-1090. PubMed ID: 30938591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two distinct mechanisms of selection in working memory: Additive last-item and retro-cue benefits.
    Niklaus M; Singmann H; Oberauer K
    Cognition; 2019 Feb; 183():282-302. PubMed ID: 30551034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Working memory training and perceptual discrimination training impact overlapping and distinct neurocognitive processes: Evidence from event-related potentials and transfer of training gains.
    Covey TJ; Shucard JL; Shucard DW
    Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():50-72. PubMed ID: 30218913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Manipulating the focus of attention in working memory: Evidence for a protection of multiple items against perceptual interference.
    Barth A; Schneider D
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13062. PubMed ID: 29315628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Think differently: a brain orienting response to task novelty.
    Barceló F; Periáñez JA; Knight RT
    Neuroreport; 2002 Oct; 13(15):1887-92. PubMed ID: 12395085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individual differences in working memory and general intelligence indexed by P200 and P300: A latent variable model.
    Wongupparaj P; Sumich A; Wickens M; Kumari V; Morris RG
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Nov; 139():96-105. PubMed ID: 30392828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-component processes in switching attention: a study of event-related potentials.
    Hsieh S
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Jun; 94(3 Pt 2):1168-76. PubMed ID: 12186238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of the global/local probability effect on the neural processing of cues and targets. A functional systems approach.
    Arjona A; Rodríguez E; Morales M; Gómez CM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Dec; 134():52-61. PubMed ID: 30342061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.
    Griffin IC; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using electrophysiology to demonstrate that cueing affects long-term memory storage over the short term.
    Maxcey AM; Fukuda K; Song WS; Woodman GF
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1349-57. PubMed ID: 25604772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory.
    Dube B; Lumsden A; Al-Aidroos N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):641-646. PubMed ID: 30276638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decoding attention control and selection in visual spatial attention.
    Hong X; Bo K; Meyyappan S; Tong S; Ding M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Oct; 41(14):3900-3921. PubMed ID: 32542852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Updating visual working memory in the change detection paradigm.
    Kessler Y; Rac-Lubashevsky R; Lichtstein C; Markus H; Simchon A; Moscovitch M
    J Vis; 2015; 15(9):18. PubMed ID: 26230980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A secondary task is not always costly: Context-based guidance of visual search survives interference from a demanding working memory task.
    Annac E; Zang X; Müller HJ; Geyer T
    Br J Psychol; 2019 May; 110(2):381-399. PubMed ID: 30260470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 37.