These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29477009)

  • 1. Converging operations and the role of perceptual and decisional influences on the perception of faces: Neural and behavioral evidence.
    Von Der Heide RJ; Wenger MJ; Bittner JL; Fitousi D
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Apr; 122():59-75. PubMed ID: 29477009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrophysiological correlates of the composite face illusion: disentangling perceptual and decisional components of holistic face processing in the human brain.
    Kuefner D; Jacques C; Prieto EA; Rossion B
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Dec; 74(3):225-38. PubMed ID: 20851511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Face inversion reveals holistic processing of peripheral faces.
    Kovács P; Knakker B; Hermann P; Kovács G; Vidnyánszky Z
    Cortex; 2017 Dec; 97():81-95. PubMed ID: 29096198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Holistic processing of faces: perceptual and decisional components.
    Richler JJ; Gauthier I; Wenger MJ; Palmeri TJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):328-42. PubMed ID: 18315409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. General recognition theory with individual differences: a new method for examining perceptual and decisional interactions with an application to face perception.
    Soto FA; Vucovich L; Musgrave R; Ashby FG
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Feb; 22(1):88-111. PubMed ID: 24841236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cognitive and neural markers of super-recognisers' face processing superiority and enhanced cross-age effect.
    Belanova E; Davis JP; Thompson T
    Cortex; 2018 Nov; 108():92-111. PubMed ID: 30149236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Holistic face processing of own- and other-age faces in young and older adults: ERP evidence from the composite face task.
    Wiese H; Kachel U; Schweinberger SR
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jul; 74():306-17. PubMed ID: 23501050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identifying sources of configurality in three face processing tasks.
    Mestry N; Menneer T; Wenger MJ; Donnelly N
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():456. PubMed ID: 23162505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decision ambiguity is mediated by a late positive potential originating from cingulate cortex.
    Sun S; Zhen S; Fu Z; Wu DA; Shimojo S; Adolphs R; Yu R; Wang S
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 157():400-414. PubMed ID: 28606805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning and attention in multidimensional identification and categorization: separating low-level perceptual processes and high-level decisional processes.
    Maddox WT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):99-115. PubMed ID: 11827090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing.
    Gauthier I; Curran T; Curby KM; Collins D
    Nat Neurosci; 2003 Apr; 6(4):428-32. PubMed ID: 12627167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity of event-related brain potentials to task rules.
    Nasr S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1343-54. PubMed ID: 22585340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Behavioral and ERP measures of holistic face processing in a composite task.
    Letourneau SM; Mitchell TV
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Jul; 67(2):234-45. PubMed ID: 18336979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. N250r and N400 ERP correlates of immediate famous face repetition are independent of perceptual load.
    Neumann MF; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1239():181-90. PubMed ID: 18793621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Separating perceptual processes from decisional processes in identification and categorization.
    Maddox WT
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Oct; 63(7):1183-200. PubMed ID: 11766943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual integration of faces and voices depends on the interaction of emotional content and spatial frequency.
    Kokinous J; Tavano A; Kotz SA; Schröger E
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Feb; 123():155-165. PubMed ID: 27979653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Structural encoding processes contribute to individual differences in face and object cognition: Inferences from psychometric test performance and event-related brain potentials.
    Nowparast Rostami H; Sommer W; Zhou C; Wilhelm O; Hildebrandt A
    Cortex; 2017 Oct; 95():192-210. PubMed ID: 28915366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An investigation of perceptual and decisional influences on the perception of hierarchical forms.
    Copeland AM; Wenger MJ
    Perception; 2006; 35(4):511-29. PubMed ID: 16700293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Oscillations or Synchrony? Disruption of Neural Synchrony despite Enhanced Gamma Oscillations in a Model of Disrupted Perceptual Coherence.
    Castelhano J; Bernardino I; Rebola J; Rodriguez E; Castelo-Branco M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 27(12):2416-26. PubMed ID: 26284991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of contrast polarity reversal on face detection: evidence of perceptual asymmetry from sweep VEP.
    Liu-Shuang J; Ales JM; Rossion B; Norcia AM
    Vision Res; 2015 Mar; 108():8-19. PubMed ID: 25595857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.