These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29477321)
1. The effect of navigation display clutter on performance and attention allocation in presentation- and simulator-based driving experiments. Pankok C; Kaber D Appl Ergon; 2018 May; 69():136-145. PubMed ID: 29477321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An integrated measure of display clutter based on feature content, user knowledge and attention allocation factors. Pankok C; Kaber DB Ergonomics; 2018 May; 61(5):682-696. PubMed ID: 29099336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Driving and side task performance: the effects of display clutter, separation, and modality. Horrey WJ; Wickens CD Hum Factors; 2004; 46(4):611-24. PubMed ID: 15709324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Head-up displays: effects of clutter, display intensity, and display location on pilot performance. Ververs PM; Wickens CD Int J Aviat Psychol; 1998; 8(4):377-403. PubMed ID: 11542276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of in-vehicle warning information displays with or without spatial compatibility on driving behaviors and response performance. Liu YC; Jhuang JW Appl Ergon; 2012 Jul; 43(4):679-86. PubMed ID: 22103964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance. Horberry T; Anderson J; Regan MA; Triggs TJ; Brown J Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Jan; 38(1):185-91. PubMed ID: 16226211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clutter in electronic medical records: examining its performance and attentional costs using eye tracking. Moacdieh N; Sarter N Hum Factors; 2015 Jun; 57(4):591-606. PubMed ID: 25850110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of driving-related performance in chronic whiplash using an advanced driving simulator. Takasaki H; Treleaven J; Johnston V; Rakotonirainy A; Haines A; Jull G Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Nov; 60():5-14. PubMed ID: 24001945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multidimensional measure of display clutter and pilot performance for advanced head-up display. Kim SH; Prinzel LJ; Kaber DB; Alexander AL; Stelzer EM; Kaufmann K; Veil T Aviat Space Environ Med; 2011 Nov; 82(11):1013-22. PubMed ID: 22097635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enhanced perception and performance by multimodal threat cueing in simulated combat vehicle. Oskarsson PA; Eriksson L; Carlander O Hum Factors; 2012 Feb; 54(1):122-37. PubMed ID: 22409107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative study of the effects of auditory, visual and multimodality displays on drivers' performance in advanced traveller information systems. Liu YC Ergonomics; 2001 Mar; 44(4):425-42. PubMed ID: 11291824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Situation awareness and driving performance in a simulated navigation task. Ma R; Kaber DB Ergonomics; 2007 Aug; 50(8):1351-64. PubMed ID: 17558674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Head up versus head down: the costs of imprecision, unreliability, and visual clutter on cue effectiveness for display signaling. Yeh M; Merlo JL; Wickens CD; Brandenburg DL Hum Factors; 2003; 45(3):390-407. PubMed ID: 14702991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of distraction mitigation strategies on driving performance. Donmez B; Boyle LN; Lee JD Hum Factors; 2006; 48(4):785-804. PubMed ID: 17240725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using Sound to Reduce Visual Distraction from In-vehicle Human-Machine Interfaces. Larsson P; Niemand M Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S25-30. PubMed ID: 26027972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Display clutter and its effects on visual attention distribution and financial risk judgment. Ognjanovic S; Thüring M; Murphy RO; Hölscher C Appl Ergon; 2019 Oct; 80():168-174. PubMed ID: 31280801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Driving while using a smartphone-based mobility application: Evaluating the impact of three multi-choice user interfaces on visual-manual distraction. Louveton N; McCall R; Koenig V; Avanesov T; Engel T Appl Ergon; 2016 May; 54():196-204. PubMed ID: 26851479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mitigating the effects of in-vehicle distractions through use of the Psychological Refractory Period paradigm. Hibberd DL; Jamson SL; Carsten OM Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():1096-103. PubMed ID: 22999382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state. Merat N; Jamson AH; Lai FC; Carsten O Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):762-71. PubMed ID: 23156621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the effectiveness of "intuitive" vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator. Ho C; Reed N; Spence C Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Sep; 38(5):988-96. PubMed ID: 16697344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]