These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29477441)

  • 21. Effect of Field Spread on Resting-State Magneto Encephalography Functional Network Analysis: A Computational Modeling Study.
    Silva Pereira S; Hindriks R; Mühlberg S; Maris E; van Ede F; Griffa A; Hagmann P; Deco G
    Brain Connect; 2017 Nov; 7(9):541-557. PubMed ID: 28875718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A multivariate method for estimating cross-frequency neuronal interactions and correcting linear mixing in MEG data, using canonical correlations.
    Soto JL; Lachaux JP; Baillet S; Jerbi K
    J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Sep; 271():169-81. PubMed ID: 27468679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Phase lag index: assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources.
    Stam CJ; Nolte G; Daffertshofer A
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Nov; 28(11):1178-93. PubMed ID: 17266107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
    Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Linear inverse source estimate of combined EEG and MEG data related to voluntary movements.
    Babiloni F; Carducci F; Cincotti F; Del Gratta C; Pizzella V; Romani GL; Rossini PM; Tecchio F; Babiloni C
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2001 Dec; 14(4):197-209. PubMed ID: 11668651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of the head model on EEG and MEG source connectivity analyses.
    Cho JH; Vorwerk J; Wolters CH; Knösche TR
    Neuroimage; 2015 Apr; 110():60-77. PubMed ID: 25638756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Estimating true brain connectivity from EEG/MEG data invariant to linear and static transformations in sensor space.
    Ewald A; Marzetti L; Zappasodi F; Meinecke FC; Nolte G
    Neuroimage; 2012 Mar; 60(1):476-88. PubMed ID: 22178298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
    Engemann DA; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Disclosing large-scale directed functional connections in MEG with the multivariate phase slope index.
    Basti A; Pizzella V; Chella F; Romani GL; Nolte G; Marzetti L
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 175():161-175. PubMed ID: 29524622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Estimating functional connectivity using 2D tangential components in MEG sensor space.
    Kim MY; Kwon H; Lim S; Lee YH; Kim JW; Kim K
    J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Jan; 257():64-75. PubMed ID: 26393280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Beamformer source analysis and connectivity on concurrent EEG and MEG data during voluntary movements.
    Muthuraman M; Hellriegel H; Hoogenboom N; Anwar AR; Mideksa KG; Krause H; Schnitzler A; Deuschl G; Raethjen J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e91441. PubMed ID: 24618596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Differences in MEG and EEG power-law scaling explained by a coupling between spatial coherence and frequency: a simulation study.
    Bénar CG; Grova C; Jirsa VK; Lina JM
    J Comput Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 47(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 31292816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sparse weightings for collapsing inverse solutions to cortical parcellations optimize M/EEG source reconstruction accuracy.
    Korhonen O; Palva S; Palva JM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Apr; 226():147-160. PubMed ID: 24509129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of the effect of volume conduction on EEG coherence with the effect of field spread on MEG coherence.
    Winter WR; Nunez PL; Ding J; Srinivasan R
    Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(21):3946-57. PubMed ID: 17607723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Exploring MEG brain fingerprints: Evaluation, pitfalls, and interpretations.
    Sareen E; Zahar S; Ville DV; Gupta A; Griffa A; Amico E
    Neuroimage; 2021 Oct; 240():118331. PubMed ID: 34237444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dissociated neuronal phase- and amplitude-coupling patterns in the human brain.
    Siems M; Siegel M
    Neuroimage; 2020 Apr; 209():116538. PubMed ID: 31935522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Identifying causal networks of neuronal sources from EEG/MEG data with the phase slope index: a simulation study.
    Ewald A; Avarvand FS; Nolte G
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2013 Apr; 58(2):165-78. PubMed ID: 23435095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Using variance information in magnetoencephalography measures of functional connectivity.
    Hall EL; Woolrich MW; Thomaz CE; Morris PG; Brookes MJ
    Neuroimage; 2013 Feb; 67():203-12. PubMed ID: 23165323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Detecting millisecond-range coupling delays between brainwaves in terms of power correlations by magnetoencephalography.
    Dabek J; Nikulin VV; Ilmoniemi RJ
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Sep; 235():10-24. PubMed ID: 24983131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Adding dynamics to the Human Connectome Project with MEG.
    Larson-Prior LJ; Oostenveld R; Della Penna S; Michalareas G; Prior F; Babajani-Feremi A; Schoffelen JM; Marzetti L; de Pasquale F; Di Pompeo F; Stout J; Woolrich M; Luo Q; Bucholz R; Fries P; Pizzella V; Romani GL; Corbetta M; Snyder AZ;
    Neuroimage; 2013 Oct; 80():190-201. PubMed ID: 23702419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.