831 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29477461)
1. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How to warn drivers in various safety-critical situations - Different strategies, different reactions.
Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():410-426. PubMed ID: 29703596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Brake reactions of distracted drivers to pedestrian Forward Collision Warning systems.
Lubbe N
J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():23-32. PubMed ID: 28454868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How do drivers avoid collisions? A driving simulator-based study.
Li X; Rakotonirainy A; Yan X
J Safety Res; 2019 Sep; 70():89-96. PubMed ID: 31848013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does assisted driving behavior lead to safety-critical encounters with unequipped vehicles' drivers?
Preuk K; Stemmler E; Schießl C; Jipp M
Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):149-56. PubMed ID: 27442594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adaptive forward collision warnings: The impact of imperfect technology on behavioral adaptation, warning effectiveness and acceptance.
Reinmueller K; Steinhauser M
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jul; 128():217-229. PubMed ID: 31063907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Forward collision warning based on a driver model to increase drivers' acceptance.
Puente Guillen P; Gohl I
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S21-S26. PubMed ID: 31381428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Towards an assistance strategy that reduces unnecessary collision alarms: An examination of the driver's perceived need for assistance.
Kaß C; Schmidt GJ; Kunde W
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Jun; 25(2):291-302. PubMed ID: 30035557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How does a collision warning system shape driver's brake response time? The influence of expectancy and automation complacency on real-life emergency braking.
Ruscio D; Ciceri MR; Biassoni F
Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Apr; 77():72-81. PubMed ID: 25700125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Driving with a partially autonomous forward collision warning system: how do drivers react?
Muhrer E; Reinprecht K; Vollrath M
Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):698-708. PubMed ID: 23156616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Autonomous emergency braking systems adapted to snowy road conditions improve drivers' perceived safety and trust.
Koglbauer I; Holzinger J; Eichberger A; Lex C
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):332-337. PubMed ID: 29227692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experiences of model year 2011 Dodge and Jeep owners with collision avoidance and related technologies.
Cicchino JB; McCartt AT
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():298-303. PubMed ID: 24983299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of warning characteristics on driver behavior in connected vehicles systems with missed warnings.
Zhang Y; Wu C; Qiao C; Hou Y
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Mar; 124():138-145. PubMed ID: 30639686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving.
Scott JJ; Gray R
Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 18516837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What happens when drivers of automated vehicles take over control in critical brake situations?
Roche F; Thüring M; Trukenbrod AK
Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 144():105588. PubMed ID: 32531374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator.
Lee JD; McGehee DV; Brown TL; Reyes ML
Hum Factors; 2002; 44(2):314-34. PubMed ID: 12452276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of cooperative systems on driver behavior in heavy fog condition based on a driving simulator.
Chang X; Li H; Qin L; Rong J; Lu Y; Chen X
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jul; 128():197-205. PubMed ID: 31054492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How does intersection field of view influence driving safety in an emergent situation?
Yan X; Zhang X; Xue Q
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Oct; 119():162-175. PubMed ID: 30036817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In-vehicle warnings for work zone and related rear-end collisions: A driving simulator experiment.
Hang J; Yan X; Li X; Duan K
Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106768. PubMed ID: 35820314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
