474 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29477789)
1. Evaluation of websites that contain information relating to malaria in pregnancy.
Hamwela V; Ahmed W; Bath PA
Public Health; 2018 Apr; 157():50-52. PubMed ID: 29477789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accessibility and Readability of Dementia-Related Information on Websites.
Arief M; Kinnunen UM; Saranto K
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2018; 251():229-232. PubMed ID: 29968645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality and readability of internet-based information on halitosis.
Jo JH; Kim EJ; Kim JR; Kim MJ; Chung JW; Park JW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2018 Mar; 125(3):215-222. PubMed ID: 29325852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of the Patient Information Quality and Readability on Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) on the Internet.
Priyanka P; Hadi YB; Reynolds GJ
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018; 2018():2849390. PubMed ID: 30510923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cauda equina syndrome: assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
O'Neill SC; Baker JF; Fitzgerald C; Fleming C; Rowan F; Byrne D; Synnott K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(10):E645-9. PubMed ID: 24583736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins.
Yan Q; Field AR; Jensen KJ; Goei C; Jiang Z; Davies MG
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2021 Jul; 9(4):1017-1024.e7. PubMed ID: 33340728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cochlear implantation: An assessment of quality and readability of web-based information aimed at patients.
Seymour N; Lakhani R; Hartley B; Cochrane L; Jephson C
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015; 16(6):321-5. PubMed ID: 26154560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tinnitus information online - does it ring true?
McKearney RM; MacKinnon RC; Smith M; Baker R
J Laryngol Otol; 2018 Nov; 132(11):984-989. PubMed ID: 30353795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.
Alhajj MN; Mashyakhy M; Ariffin Z; Ab-Ghani Z; Johari Y; Salim NS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):956-960. PubMed ID: 33568578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.
O'Connell Ferster AP; Hu A
Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Mar; 96(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 28346643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Tinnitus.
Manchaiah V; Dockens AL; Flagge A; Bellon-Harn M; Azios JH; Kelly-Campbell RJ; Andersson G
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 30461391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Readability and quality of online eating disorder information-Are they sufficient? A systematic review evaluating websites on anorexia nervosa using DISCERN and Flesch Readability.
Arts H; Lemetyinen H; Edge D
Int J Eat Disord; 2020 Jan; 53(1):128-132. PubMed ID: 31589331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality and readability of web-based Arabic health information on COVID-19: an infodemiological study.
Halboub E; Al-Ak'hali MS; Al-Mekhlafi HM; Alhajj MN
BMC Public Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):151. PubMed ID: 33461516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the quality and variability of health information on chronic pain websites using the DISCERN instrument.
Kaicker J; Borg Debono V; Dang W; Buckley N; Thabane L
BMC Med; 2010 Oct; 8():59. PubMed ID: 20939875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing the quality, reliability and readability of online health information regarding systemic lupus erythematosus.
Reynolds M; Hoi A; Buchanan RRC
Lupus; 2018 Oct; 27(12):1911-1917. PubMed ID: 30114969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How evidence-based is the information on the internet about nausea and vomiting of pregnancy?
Sacks S; Abenhaim HA
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Aug; 35(8):697-703. PubMed ID: 24007704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality and readability of online information on hand osteoarthritis.
Hong SW; Kang JH; Park JH; Park HJ; Kim E
Health Informatics J; 2023; 29(1):14604582231169297. PubMed ID: 36995242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Web-based information on the treatment of oral leukoplakia - quality and readability.
Wiriyakijja P; Fedele S; Porter S; Ni Riordain R
J Oral Pathol Med; 2016 Sep; 45(8):617-20. PubMed ID: 27233229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
