BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29477880)

  • 1. Effectiveness of pneumatically powered penetrating and non-penetrating captive bolts in stunning cattle.
    Oliveira SEO; Gregory NG; Dalla Costa FA; Gibson TJ; Dalla Costa OA; Paranhos da Costa MJR
    Meat Sci; 2018 Jun; 140():9-13. PubMed ID: 29477880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electroencephalographic assessment of pneumatically powered penetrating and non-penetrating captive-bolt stunning of bulls.
    Gibson TJ; Oliveira SEO; Costa FAD; Gregory NG
    Meat Sci; 2019 May; 151():54-59. PubMed ID: 30685511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficiency of low versus high airline pressure in stunning cattle with a pneumatically powered penetrating captive bolt gun.
    Oliveira SEO; Gregory NG; Dalla Costa FA; Gibson TJ; Paranhos da Costa MJR
    Meat Sci; 2017 Aug; 130():64-68. PubMed ID: 28433852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A note comparing the welfare of Zebu cattle following three stunning-slaughter methods.
    Neves JE; Paranhos da Costa MJ; Roça RO; Faucitano L; Gregory NG
    Meat Sci; 2016 Jul; 117():41-3. PubMed ID: 26946474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of brain damage resulting from penetrating and non-penetrating stunning in Nelore Cattle using pneumatically powered captive bolt guns.
    Oliveira SEO; Dalla Costa FA; Gibson TJ; Costa OAD; Coldebella A; Gregory NG
    Meat Sci; 2018 Nov; 145():347-351. PubMed ID: 30029088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cattle stunning with a penetrative captive bolt device: A review.
    Kamenik J; Paral V; Pyszko M; Voslarova E
    Anim Sci J; 2019 Mar; 90(3):307-316. PubMed ID: 30669179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reduction of the occurrence of incorrect stunning and the occurrence of reflexes and reactions in cattle after pneumatically powered captive-bolt stunning in comparison with cartridge-fired captive-bolt stunning.
    Kaluza M; Vecerek V; Voslarova E; Kamenik J; Konvalinova J; Valkova L; Takacova D
    Anim Sci J; 2022; 93(1):e13728. PubMed ID: 35470517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Return-to-sensibility problems after penetrating captive bolt stunning of cattle in commercial beef slaughter plants.
    Grandin T
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2002 Nov; 221(9):1258-61. PubMed ID: 12418689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of indicators used to assess unconsciousness in veal calves at slaughter.
    Verhoeven MT; Gerritzen MA; Hellebrekers LJ; Kemp B
    Animal; 2016 Sep; 10(9):1457-65. PubMed ID: 26965337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electroencephalographic assessment of concussive non-penetrative captive bolt stunning of turkeys.
    Gibson TJ; Rebelo CB; Gowers TA; Chancellor NM
    Br Poult Sci; 2018 Feb; 59(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 29099622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of nonpenetrating captive bolt stunning followed by electrical induction of cardiac arrest in veal calves.
    Bartz B; Collins M; Stoddard G; Appleton A; Livingood R; Sobcynski H; Vogel KD
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Sep; 93(9):4557-63. PubMed ID: 26440354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of captive bolt to cattle stunning - a survey of stunner placement under practical conditions.
    Fries R; Schrohe K; Lotz F; Arndt G
    Animal; 2012 Jul; 6(7):1124-8. PubMed ID: 23031473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The occurrence of reflexes and reactions in cattle following stunning with a captive bolt at the slaughterhouse.
    Vecerek V; Kamenik J; Voslarova E; Vecerkova L; Machovcova Z; Volfova M; Konvalinova J
    Anim Sci J; 2020; 91(1):e13373. PubMed ID: 32301197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of different captive bolt lengths and breed influence upon post-stun hind limb and forelimb activity in fed cattle at a commercial slaughter facility.
    Martin MS; Kline HC; Wagner DR; Alexander LR; Edwards-Callaway LN; Grandin T
    Meat Sci; 2018 Sep; 143():159-164. PubMed ID: 29753218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigation Into the Humaneness of Slaughter Methods for Guinea Pigs (Cavia porcelus) in the Andean Region.
    Limon G; Gonzales-Gustavson EA; Gibson TJ
    J Appl Anim Welf Sci; 2016; 19(3):280-93. PubMed ID: 26963642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Indicators used in livestock to assess unconsciousness after stunning: a review.
    Verhoeven MT; Gerritzen MA; Hellebrekers LJ; Kemp B
    Animal; 2015 Feb; 9(2):320-30. PubMed ID: 25354537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Origins of movements following stunning and during bleeding in cattle.
    Terlouw EM; Bourguet C; Deiss V; Mallet C
    Meat Sci; 2015 Dec; 110():135-44. PubMed ID: 26225929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of captive bolt gun length on brain trauma and post-stunning hind limb activity in finished cattle Bos taurus.
    Kline HC; Wagner DR; Edwards-Callaway LN; Alexander LR; Grandin T
    Meat Sci; 2019 Sep; 155():69-73. PubMed ID: 31082781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of bolt length on penetration hole characteristics, brain damage and specified-risk material dispersal in finished cattle stunned with a penetrating captive bolt stunner.
    Wagner DR; Kline HC; Martin MS; Alexander LR; Grandin T; Edwards-Callaway LN
    Meat Sci; 2019 Sep; 155():109-114. PubMed ID: 31103942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pathophysiology of Concussive Non-Penetrative Captive Bolt Stunning of Turkeys.
    Gibson TJ; King E; Spence J; Limon G
    Animals (Basel); 2019 Nov; 9(12):. PubMed ID: 31795487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.