225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29478085)
21. Transradial Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Kedev S
Interv Cardiol Clin; 2015 Apr; 4(2):167-177. PubMed ID: 28582048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock.
Lee JM; Rhee TM; Hahn JY; Kim HK; Park J; Hwang D; Choi KH; Kim J; Park TK; Yang JH; Song YB; Choi JH; Choi SH; Koo BK; Kim YJ; Chae SC; Cho MC; Kim CJ; Gwon HC; Kim JH; Kim HS; Jeong MH;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2018 Feb; 71(8):844-856. PubMed ID: 29471935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Full conversion from transfemoral to transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions results in a similar success rate and a rapid reduction of in-hospital cardiac and vascular major events.
Dangoisse V; Guédès A; Gabriel L; Jamart J; Chenu P; Marchandise B; Schroeder E
EuroIntervention; 2013 Jul; 9(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 23872649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Use and outcome of radial versus femoral approach for primary PCI in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction without cardiogenic shock: results from the ALKK PCI registry.
Bauer T; Hochadel M; Brachmann J; Schächinger V; Boekstegers P; Zrenner B; Zahn R; Zeymer U;
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Oct; 86 Suppl 1():S8-14. PubMed ID: 25945803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Outcomes of transradial primary percutaneous intervention from a tertiary cardiac centre in Turkey.
Ulucan S; Kaya Z; Keser A; Katlandur H; Özdil H; Ateş İ; Ulgen MS
Int J Clin Exp Med; 2015; 8(7):11404-11. PubMed ID: 26379956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prediction and impact of failure of transradial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
Abdelaal E; MacHaalany J; Plourde G; Barria Perez A; Bouchard MP; Roy M; Déry JP; Déry U; Barbeau G; Larose É; Gleeton O; Noël B; Rodés-Cabau J; Roy L; Costerousse O; Bertrand OF
Heart; 2016 Jun; 102(12):919-25. PubMed ID: 27030600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Arterial access site utilization in cardiogenic shock in the United Kingdom: is radial access feasible?
Mamas MA; Anderson SG; Ratib K; Routledge H; Neyses L; Fraser DG; Buchan I; de Belder MA; Ludman P; Nolan J; ;
Am Heart J; 2014 Jun; 167(6):900-8.e1. PubMed ID: 24890541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Radial versus femoral artery access for percutaneous coronary artery intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease complicated by cardiogenic shock: Subanalysis from the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial.
Guedeney P; Thiele H; Kerneis M; Barthélémy O; Baumann S; Sandri M; de Waha-Thiele S; Fuernau G; Rouanet S; Piek JJ; Landmesser U; Hauguel-Moreau M; Zeitouni M; Silvain J; Lattuca B; Windecker S; Collet JP; Desch S; Zeymer U; Montalescot G; Akin I;
Am Heart J; 2020 Jul; 225():60-68. PubMed ID: 32497906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Improved outcomes from transradial over transfemoral access in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and upstream use of tirofiban.
Zhang Q; Qiu JP; Zhang RY; Hu J; Yang ZK; Ding FH; DU R; Zhu TQ; Zhang JS; Shen WF
Chin Med J (Engl); 2013 Mar; 126(6):1063-8. PubMed ID: 23506579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Left main percutaneous coronary intervention-Radial versus femoral access: A systematic analysis.
Goel S; Pasam RT; Raheja H; Gotesman J; Gidwani U; Ahuja KR; Reed G; Puri R; Khatri JK; Kapadia SR
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jun; 95(7):E201-E213. PubMed ID: 31430040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Transradial percutaneous coronary interventions in acute coronary syndrome.
Khan R; Ly HQ
Am J Cardiol; 2014 Jul; 114(1):160-8. PubMed ID: 24925803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Transradial versus Transfemoral Access and the Risk of Acute Kidney Injury following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Propensity-Score-Matched Studies.
Del Rio-Pertuz G; Juarez M; Mekraksakit P; Parmar K; Ansari MM
J Interv Cardiol; 2022; 2022():6774439. PubMed ID: 35360090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Radial versus femoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Trial sequential analysis.
Osman M; Saleem M; Osman K; Kheiri B; Regner S; Radaideh Q; Moreland JA; Rao SV; Kapadia S
Am Heart J; 2020 Jun; 224():98-104. PubMed ID: 32361279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Risk score, causes, and clinical impact of failure of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions.
Abdelaal E; Brousseau-Provencher C; Montminy S; Plourde G; MacHaalany J; Bataille Y; Molin P; Déry JP; Barbeau G; Roy L; Larose É; De Larochellière R; Nguyen CM; Proulx G; Costerousse O; Bertrand OF;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1129-37. PubMed ID: 24139933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Transradial access as first choice for primary percutaneous coronary interventions: experience from a tertiary hospital in Athens.
Deftereos S; Giannopoulos G; Raisakis K; Kaoukis A; Kossyvakis C; Pappas L; Panagopoulou V; Mavrogianni AD; Theodorakis A; Perpinia A; Michelakakis N; Bobotis G; Pyrgakis V
Hellenic J Cardiol; 2011; 52(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 21478120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The fluoroscopy time, door to balloon time, contrast volume use and prevalence of vascular access site failure with transradial versus transfemoral approach in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: A systematic review & meta-analysis.
Singh S; Singh M; Grewal N; Khosla S
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2015 Dec; 16(8):491-7. PubMed ID: 26563537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Radial or femoral access in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): Does the choice matters?
Batra MK; Rai L; Khan NU; Mengal MN; Khowaja S; Hassan Rizvi SN; Saghir T; Qamar N; Sial JA; Karim M
Indian Heart J; 2020; 72(3):166-171. PubMed ID: 32768015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Radial versus femoral access site for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients suffering acute myocardial infarction : A randomized prospective multicenter trial.
Schernthaner C; Hammerer M; Harb S; Heigert M; Hoellinger K; Lassnig E; Maurer E; Schuler J; Siostrzonek P; Ulmer H; Winter A; Altenberger J
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2018 Mar; 130(5-6):182-189. PubMed ID: 28900715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Transradial versus transfemoral approach in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction: insight from the CREDO-Kyoto AMI registry.
Yamashita Y; Shiomi H; Morimoto T; Yaku H; Kaji S; Furukawa Y; Nakagawa Y; Ando K; Kadota K; Abe M; Akao M; Nagao K; Shizuta S; Ono K; Kimura T;
Heart Vessels; 2017 Dec; 32(12):1448-1457. PubMed ID: 28698995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: A radial-first centre experience and meta-analysis of published studies.
Roule V; Lemaitre A; Sabatier R; Lognoné T; Dahdouh Z; Berger L; Milliez P; Grollier G; Montalescot G; Beygui F
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2015 Nov; 108(11):563-75. PubMed ID: 26365478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
