225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29478085)
41. Comparison of Long-Term Clinical Outcome Between Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Infarct-Related Artery-Only Revascularization for Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock.
Lee JM; Rhee TM; Kim HK; Hwang D; Lee SH; Choi KH; Kim J; Park TK; Yang JH; Song YB; Choi JH; Choi SH; Koo BK; Chae SC; Cho MC; Kim CJ; Kim JH; Kim HS; Gwon HC; Jeong MH; Hahn JY;
J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 Dec; 8(24):e013870. PubMed ID: 31818215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Is percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main coronary artery via transradial approach feasible for skilled transfemoral operators? Initial experience in an unselected population.
Tomassini F; Gagnor A; Montali N; Gambino A; Bollati M; Infantino V; Tizzani E; Varbella F
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2013; 14(4):193-6. PubMed ID: 23768506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Cardiogenic shock and access site choice.
Pancholy SB; Patel G; Nanavaty SP; Pancholy MS
Minerva Cardioangiol; 2017 Feb; 65(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 27727197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Transradial Approach in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Lessons from a High-volume Centre.
Piers LH; Vink MA; Amoroso G
Interv Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 11(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 29588712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Sheathless guide catheter in transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Miyasaka M; Tada N; Kato S; Kami M; Horie K; Honda T; Takizawa K; Otomo T; Inoue N
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 May; 87(6):1111-7. PubMed ID: 26354160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Transradial intervention for patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction with or without cardiogenic shock.
Fujii T; Masuda N; Ijichi T; Kamiyama Y; Tanaka S; Nakazawa G; Shinozaki N; Matsukage T; Ogata N; Ikari Y
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 83(1):E1-7. PubMed ID: 23441063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Culprit Vessel-Only Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Complicating ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Collaborative Meta-Analysis.
Kolte D; Sardar P; Khera S; Zeymer U; Thiele H; Hochadel M; Radovanovic D; Erne P; Hambraeus K; James S; Claessen BE; Henriques JPS; Mylotte D; Garot P; Aronow WS; Owan T; Jain D; Panza JA; Frishman WH; Fonarow GC; Bhatt DL; Aronow HD; Abbott JD
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 29146672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: re-evaluation of the current body of evidence.
Lee MS; Wolfe M; Stone GW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1149-52. PubMed ID: 24262614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Operator learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary interventions: implications for the initiation of a transradial access program in contemporary US practice.
Barbash IM; Minha S; Gallino R; Lager R; Badr S; Loh JP; Kitabata H; Pendyala LK; Torguson R; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jun; 15(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 24746598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Results of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients ≥75 years treated by the transradial approach.
Rodriguez-Leor O; Fernandez-Nofrerias E; Carrillo X; Mauri J; Labata C; Oliete C; Rivas Mdel C; Bayes-Genis A
Am J Cardiol; 2014 Feb; 113(3):452-6. PubMed ID: 24315363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Complete transitioning to the radial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a real-world single-center registry of 1808 consecutive patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Kedev S; Kalpak O; Dharma S; Antov S; Kostov J; Pejkov H; Spiroski I
J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 Sep; 26(9):475-82. PubMed ID: 25198492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Older Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock.
Damluji AA; Bandeen-Roche K; Berkower C; Boyd CM; Al-Damluji MS; Cohen MG; Forman DE; Chaudhary R; Gerstenblith G; Walston JD; Resar JR; Moscucci M
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2019 Apr; 73(15):1890-1900. PubMed ID: 30999991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access in Patients Undergoing Rescue Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Fibrinolytic Therapy.
Kadakia MB; Rao SV; McCoy L; Choudhuri PS; Sherwood MW; Lilly S; Kobayashi T; Kolansky DM; Wilensky RL; Yeh RW; Giri J
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Dec; 8(14):1868-76. PubMed ID: 26718516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Radial versus femoral access is associated with reduced complications and mortality in patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: an observational cohort study of 10,095 patients.
Iqbal MB; Arujuna A; Ilsley C; Archbold A; Crake T; Firoozi S; Kalra S; Knight C; Lim P; Malik IS; Mathur A; Meier P; Rakhit RD; Redwood S; Whitbread M; Bromage D; Rathod K; Wragg A; MacCarthy P; Dalby M;
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Aug; 7(4):456-64. PubMed ID: 24963013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparison between radial and femoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention in left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of nonrandomized trials.
Ye Y; Zeng Y
Coron Artery Dis; 2019 Mar; 30(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 30531449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Transradial versus transfemoral coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: is transradial coronary intervention suitable for emergency PCI in high-risk acute myocardial infarction?
Iga A; Wagatsuma K; Yamazaki J; Ikeda T
J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 May; 26(5):196-202. PubMed ID: 24791717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Management and predictors of outcome in unselected patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the Bremen STEMI Registry.
Backhaus T; Fach A; Schmucker J; Fiehn E; Garstka D; Stehmeier J; Hambrecht R; Wienbergen H
Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 May; 107(5):371-379. PubMed ID: 29230546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for the angiography and intervention in patients with a history of coronary artery bypass surgery: in-hospital and 1-year follow-up results.
He PY; Yang YJ; Qiao SB; Xu B; Yao M; Wu YJ; Yuan JQ; Chen J; Liu HB; Dai J; Tang XR; Wang Y; Li W; Gao RL
Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Mar; 128(6):762-7. PubMed ID: 25758269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Impact of vascular approach (transradial vs. transfemoral) on the efficacy of thrombus aspiration in acute myocardial infarction patients.
Sciahbasi A; Burzotta F; Rigattieri S; Pendenza G; Romagnoli E; Trani C; Loschiavo P; Penco M; Lioy E
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2012; 13(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 22226170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Systematic use of transradial PCI in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a call to "arms".
Eleid MF; Rihal CS; Gulati R; Bell MR
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1145-8. PubMed ID: 24262613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
