135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29478220)
1. Biofilm formation and antimicrobial sensitivity of lactobacilli contaminants from sugarcane-based fuel ethanol fermentation.
Dellias MTF; Borges CD; Lopes ML; da Cruz SH; de Amorim HV; Tsai SM
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2018 Sep; 111(9):1631-1644. PubMed ID: 29478220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biofilm formation and ethanol inhibition by bacterial contaminants of biofuel fermentation.
Rich JO; Leathers TD; Bischoff KM; Anderson AM; Nunnally MS
Bioresour Technol; 2015 Nov; 196():347-54. PubMed ID: 26255598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inhibition of Lactobacillus biofilm growth in fuel ethanol fermentations by Bacillus.
Saunders LP; Bischoff KM; Bowman MJ; Leathers TD
Bioresour Technol; 2019 Jan; 272():156-161. PubMed ID: 30336397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Homo- and heterofermentative lactobacilli differently affect sugarcane-based fuel ethanol fermentation.
Basso TO; Gomes FS; Lopes ML; de Amorim HV; Eggleston G; Basso LC
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2014 Jan; 105(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 24198118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inhibitors of biofilm formation by biofuel fermentation contaminants.
Leathers TD; Bischoff KM; Rich JO; Price NPJ; Manitchotpisit P; Nunnally MS; Anderson AM
Bioresour Technol; 2014 Oct; 169():45-51. PubMed ID: 25022836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rapid evaluation of the antibiotic susceptibility of fuel ethanol contaminant biofilms.
Rich JO; Leathers TD; Nunnally MS; Bischoff KM
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(2):1124-30. PubMed ID: 20855199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterization of the contaminant bacterial communities in sugarcane first-generation industrial ethanol production.
Bonatelli ML; Quecine MC; Silva MS; Labate CA
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2017 Sep; 364(17):. PubMed ID: 28903464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Resistance to antimicrobial agents in lactobacilli isolated from caper fermentations.
Pérez Pulido R; Omar NB; Lucas R; Abriouel H; Martínez Cañamero M; Gálvez A
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2005; 88(3-4):277-81. PubMed ID: 16284934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Yeast Derived LysA2 Can Control Bacterial Contamination in Ethanol Fermentation.
Kim JS; Daum MA; Jin YS; Miller MJ
Viruses; 2018 May; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 29795003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interaction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae-Lactobacillus fermentum-Dekkera bruxellensis and feedstock on fuel ethanol fermentation.
Bassi APG; Meneguello L; Paraluppi AL; Sanches BCP; Ceccato-Antonini SR
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2018 Sep; 111(9):1661-1672. PubMed ID: 29488182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lipoteichoic acids of lactobacilli inhibit Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation and disrupt the preformed biofilm.
Jung S; Park OJ; Kim AR; Ahn KB; Lee D; Kum KY; Yun CH; Han SH
J Microbiol; 2019 Apr; 57(4):310-315. PubMed ID: 30671742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the bacterial viability of chlorine- and quaternary ammonium compounds-treated Lactobacillus cells via a multi-method approach.
Olszewska MA; Nynca A; Białobrzewski I; Kocot AM; Łaguna J
J Appl Microbiol; 2019 Apr; 126(4):1070-1080. PubMed ID: 30664312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Lactobacillus species isolated from commercial ethanol plants.
Bischoff KM; Skinner-Nemec KA; Leathers TD
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Nov; 34(11):739-44. PubMed ID: 17726620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microbial diversity in sugarcane ethanol production in a Brazilian distillery using a culture-independent method.
Costa OY; Souto BM; Tupinambá DD; Bergmann JC; Kyaw CM; Kruger RH; Barreto CC; Quirino BF
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2015 Jan; 42(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 25404204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamics of microbial contaminants is driven by selection during ethanol production.
Queiroz LL; Costa MS; de Abreu Pereira A; de Paula Avila M; Costa PS; Nascimento AMA; Lacorte GA
Braz J Microbiol; 2020 Mar; 51(1):303-312. PubMed ID: 31705383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The consequences of Lactobacillus vini and Dekkera bruxellensis as contaminants of the sugarcane-based ethanol fermentation.
de Souza RB; dos Santos BM; de Fátima Rodrigues de Souza R; da Silva PK; Lucena BT; de Morais MA
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2012 Nov; 39(11):1645-50. PubMed ID: 22842986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conventional and nonconventional strategies for controlling bacterial contamination in fuel ethanol fermentations.
Ceccato-Antonini SR
World J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 May; 34(6):80. PubMed ID: 29802468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of bacteria identification array to detect lactobacilli in Thai fermented sausage.
Rungrassamee W; Tosukhowong A; Klanchui A; Maibunkaew S; Plengvidhya V; Karoonuthaisiri N
J Microbiol Methods; 2012 Dec; 91(3):341-53. PubMed ID: 23022427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biofilm formation by lactic acid bacteria and resistance to environmental stress.
Kubota H; Senda S; Nomura N; Tokuda H; Uchiyama H
J Biosci Bioeng; 2008 Oct; 106(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 19000615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Probiotic potential of lactobacillus strains isolated from sorghum-based traditional fermented food.
Rao KP; Chennappa G; Suraj U; Nagaraja H; Raj AP; Sreenivasa MY
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins; 2015 Jun; 7(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 25666113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
