227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29478943)
1. Can the contralateral scapula be used as a reliable template to reconstruct the eroded scapula during shoulder arthroplasty?
Verhaegen F; Plessers K; Verborgt O; Scheys L; Debeer P
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Jun; 27(6):1133-1138. PubMed ID: 29478943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Premorbid glenoid anatomy reconstruction from contralateral shoulder 3-dimensional measurements: a computed tomography scan analysis of 260 shoulders.
Giraudon T; Morvan Y; Walch A; Walch G; Werthel JD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Apr; 33(4):792-797. PubMed ID: 37852431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiographic characterization of the B2 glenoid: the effect of computed tomographic axis orientation.
Chalmers PN; Salazar D; Chamberlain A; Keener JD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Feb; 26(2):258-264. PubMed ID: 27592372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiographic characterization of the B2 glenoid: is inclusion of the entirety of the scapula necessary?
Chalmers PN; Salazar D; Chamberlain A; Keener JD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 May; 26(5):855-860. PubMed ID: 28131692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interest in the glenoid hull method for analyzing humeral subluxation in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis.
Bouacida S; Gauci MO; Coulet B; Lazerges C; Cyteval C; Boileau P; Chammas M
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Jul; 26(7):1128-1136. PubMed ID: 28372968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Study of the variability of scapular inclination and the glenoid version - considerations for preoperative planning: clinical-radiological study.
Fulin P; Kysilko M; Pokorny D; Padr R; Kasprikova N; Landor I; Sosna A
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Jan; 18(1):16. PubMed ID: 28088244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Virtual reconstruction of glenoid bone defects using a statistical shape model.
Plessers K; Vanden Berghe P; Van Dijck C; Wirix-Speetjens R; Debeer P; Jonkers I; Vander Sloten J
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Jan; 27(1):160-166. PubMed ID: 29032987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Design and development of a computer assisted glenoid implantation technique for shoulder replacement surgery.
Nguyen D; Ferreira LM; Brownhill JR; Faber KJ; Johnson JA
Comput Aided Surg; 2007 May; 12(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 17538787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determination of pre-arthropathy scapular anatomy with a statistical shape model: part I-rotator cuff tear arthropathy.
Verhaegen F; Meynen A; Matthews H; Claes P; Debeer P; Scheys L
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 May; 30(5):1095-1106. PubMed ID: 32822879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is premorbid glenoid anatomy altered in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis?
Ricchetti ET; Hendel MD; Collins DN; Iannotti JP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Sep; 471(9):2932-9. PubMed ID: 23686428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of the fulcrum axis to estimate the central scapular axis.
Le SV; Conrad B; Wright TW
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2014 Aug; 23(8):1143-9. PubMed ID: 24582955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 3-dimensionally printed patient-specific glenoid drill guides vs. standard nonspecific instrumentation: a randomized controlled trial comparing the accuracy of glenoid component placement in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.
Dasari SP; Menendez ME; Espinoza Orias A; Khan ZA; Vadhera AS; Ebersole JW; White GM; Forsythe B; Cole BJ; Nicholson GP; Garrigues GE; Verma NN
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Feb; 33(2):223-233. PubMed ID: 37774830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of scapular tilt on radiographic assessment of the glenoid component after total shoulder arthroplasty: which radiographic landmarks are reliable?
Zwingenberger S; Ditzen T; Raiss P; Merle C; Kasten P
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Apr; 25(4):564-71. PubMed ID: 26725868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of three-dimensional planning on decision-making in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Werner BS; Hudek R; Burkhart KJ; Gohlke F
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Aug; 26(8):1477-1483. PubMed ID: 28162884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting normal glenoid version from the pathologic scapula: a comparison of 4 methods in 2- and 3-dimensional models.
Ganapathi A; McCarron JA; Chen X; Iannotti JP
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2011 Mar; 20(2):234-44. PubMed ID: 20933439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automated Three-Dimensional Measurement of Glenoid Version and Inclination in Arthritic Shoulders.
Boileau P; Cheval D; Gauci MO; Holzer N; Chaoui J; Walch G
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Jan; 100(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 29298261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient-specific instrumentation for total shoulder arthroplasty: not as accurate as it would seem.
Lau SC; Keith PPA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Jan; 27(1):90-95. PubMed ID: 28927670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three dimensional patient-specific guides for guide pin positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: An experimental study on different glenoid types.
Mohammad Sadeghi M; Kececi EF; Kapicioglu M; Aralasmak A; Tezgel O; Basaran MA; Yildiz F; Bilsel K
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2022; 30(1):10225536221079432. PubMed ID: 35220811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Glenoid spherical orientation and version.
Lewis GS; Armstrong AD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2011 Jan; 20(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 20932782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional planning and use of patient-specific guides improve glenoid component position: an in vitro study.
Walch G; Vezeridis PS; Boileau P; Deransart P; Chaoui J
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 Feb; 24(2):302-9. PubMed ID: 25183662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
