121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29480795)
1. Comparison of two commercial quantitative PCR assays for EBV DNA detection and their correlation with the first WHO International Standard for EBV.
Engelmann I; Alidjinou EK; Lazrek M; Pouillaude JM; Ogiez J; Rose F; Duhamel A; Dewilde A; Hober D
J Med Microbiol; 2018 Apr; 67(4):529-536. PubMed ID: 29480795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of two commercial quantitative PCR assays and correlation with the first WHO International Standard for human CMV.
Engelmann I; Alidjinou EK; Lazrek M; Ogiez J; Pouillaude JM; Chazard E; Dewilde A; Hober D
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2018 May; 91(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 29463426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of commercial extraction systems and PCR assays for quantification of Epstein-Barr virus DNA load in whole blood.
Germi R; Lupo J; Semenova T; Larrat S; Magnat N; Grossi L; Seigneurin JM; Morand P
J Clin Microbiol; 2012 Apr; 50(4):1384-9. PubMed ID: 22238432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of the Real-Q EBV Quantification Kit for Epstein-Barr Virus DNA Quantification in Whole Blood.
Huh HJ; Park JE; Kim JY; Yun SA; Lee MK; Lee NY; Kim JW; Ki CS
Ann Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(2):147-150. PubMed ID: 28029001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the Epstein-Barr virus R-gene quantification kit in whole blood with different extraction methods and PCR platforms.
Fafi-Kremer S; Morand P; Barranger C; Barguès G; Magro S; Bés J; Bourgeois P; Joannes M; Seigneurin JM
J Mol Diagn; 2008 Jan; 10(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 18165270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of four commercial extraction-quantification systems to monitor EBV or CMV viral load in whole blood.
Baron A; Gicquel A; Plantier JC; Gueudin M
J Clin Virol; 2019 Apr; 113():39-44. PubMed ID: 30870646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative Evaluation of Four Real-Time PCR Methods for the Quantitative Detection of Epstein-Barr Virus from Whole Blood Specimens.
Buelow D; Sun Y; Tang L; Gu Z; Pounds S; Hayden R
J Mol Diagn; 2016 Jul; 18(4):527-34. PubMed ID: 27157323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of targeting repetitive BamHI-W sequences on the sensitivity and precision of EBV DNA quantification.
Sanosyan A; Fayd'herbe de Maudave A; Bollore K; Zimmermann V; Foulongne V; Van de Perre P; Tuaillon E
PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0183856. PubMed ID: 28850597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analytical and clinical performance of a new molecular assay for Epstein-Barr virus DNA quantitation.
Hübner M; Bozic M; Konrad PM; Grohs K; Santner BI; Kessler HH
J Virol Methods; 2015 Feb; 212():39-43. PubMed ID: 25445796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of commercial real-time PCR assays for quantification of Epstein-Barr virus DNA.
Ruiz G; Peña P; de Ory F; Echevarría JE
J Clin Microbiol; 2005 May; 43(5):2053-7. PubMed ID: 15872221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of four commercial EBV DNA quantitative tests to a new test at an early stage of development.
Stelzl E; Kessler HH; Parulekar AD; Bier C; Nörz D; Schneider T; Kumar S; Simon CO; Lütgehetmann M
J Clin Virol; 2023 Apr; 161():105400. PubMed ID: 36796282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of automated DNA extraction coupled with real-time PCR for measuring Epstein-Barr virus load in whole blood, peripheral mononuclear cells and plasma.
Fafi-Kremer S; Brengel-Pesce K; Barguès G; Bourgeat MJ; Genoulaz O; Seigneurin JM; Morand P
J Clin Virol; 2004 Jun; 30(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 15125872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of nasal and nasopharyngeal swab collection for the detection of Epstein-Barr virus in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Coghill AE; Wang CP; Verkuijilen SAWM; Yu KJ; Hsu WL; Middeldorp JM; Hildesheim A
J Med Virol; 2018 Jan; 90(1):191-195. PubMed ID: 28833336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) load determination using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Fan H; Robetorye RS
Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 999():231-43. PubMed ID: 23666703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of commercial and in-house Real-time PCR assays for quantification of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA in plasma.
Perandin F; Cariani E; Pollara CP; Manca N
BMC Microbiol; 2007 Mar; 7():22. PubMed ID: 17391518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of real-time PCR assays for the quantitative detection of Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus, comparison of TaqMan probes, and molecular beacons.
Jebbink J; Bai X; Rogers BB; Dawson DB; Scheuermann RH; Domiati-Saad R
J Mol Diagn; 2003 Feb; 5(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12552075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance Evaluation of the Fully Automated NeuMoDx RT-PCR Platform for the Quantification of CMV and EBV DNA in EDTA Plasma: Implications for Clinical Management and Establishment of a Conversion Formula.
Herdina AN; Ratzinger F; Breuer M; Schellnegger J; Chen RQ; Watkins-Riedel T; Perkmann-Nagele N; Strassl R
Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Dec; 10(6):e0215722. PubMed ID: 36342307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Commutability of the Epstein-Barr virus WHO international standard across two quantitative PCR methods.
Abeynayake J; Johnson R; Libiran P; Sahoo MK; Cao H; Bowen R; Chan KC; Le QT; Pinsky BA
J Clin Microbiol; 2014 Oct; 52(10):3802-4. PubMed ID: 25078918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Routine use of real-time quantitative PCR for laboratory diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus infections.
Brengel-Pesce K; Morand P; Schmuck A; Bourgeat MJ; Buisson M; Barguès G; Bouzid M; Seigneurin JM
J Med Virol; 2002 Mar; 66(3):360-9. PubMed ID: 11793388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of two automated real-time PCR-based quantification methods for whole blood Epstein-Barr viral load.
Vancutsem E; Crombé F; Soetens O; Wautier M; Dördelmann C; Piérard D; Wybo I; Demuyser T
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2024 Feb; 108(2):116101. PubMed ID: 38016384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
