121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29480795)
21. A multiplex calibrated real-time PCR assay for quantitation of DNA of EBV-1 and 2.
Gatto F; Cassina G; Broccolo F; Morreale G; Lanino E; Di Marco E; Vardas E; Bernasconi D; Buttò S; Principi N; Esposito S; Scarlatti G; Lusso P; Malnati MS
J Virol Methods; 2011 Dec; 178(1-2):98-105. PubMed ID: 21903135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of a Quantitative Dual-Target EBV DNA Test on a Fully Automated Molecular Testing System.
Lütgehetmann M; Albert E; Hamilton A; Jarem D; Pfefferle S; Stucki H; Navarro D
J Clin Microbiol; 2023 Aug; 61(8):e0051823. PubMed ID: 37432105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multicenter Evaluation of Whole-Blood Epstein-Barr Viral Load Standardization Using the WHO International Standard.
Semenova T; Lupo J; Alain S; Perrin-Confort G; Grossi L; Dimier J; Epaulard O; Morand P; Germi R
J Clin Microbiol; 2016 Jul; 54(7):1746-1750. PubMed ID: 27076661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Performance characteristics of two real-time PCR assays for the quantification of Epstein-Barr virus DNA.
Hill CE; Harris SB; Culler EE; Zimring JC; Nolte FS; Caliendo AM
Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 May; 125(5):665-71. PubMed ID: 16707366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Serum Epstein-Barr virus DNA load in primary Epstein-Barr virus infection.
Bauer CC; Aberle SW; Popow-Kraupp T; Kapitan M; Hofmann H; Puchhammer-Stöckl E
J Med Virol; 2005 Jan; 75(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 15543583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of two laboratory extraction techniques for the detection of Epstein-Barr virus in the saliva of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.
Shan J; Pow EH; Tsang PC; Perera RA; Kwong DL
J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 May; 5(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 24574317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of a LightCycler-based real-time PCR for quantitation of Epstein-Barr viral load in different clinical specimens with semiquantitative PCR.
Krumbholz A; Meerbach A; Zell R; Gruhn B; Henke A; Birch-Hirschfeld E; Wutzler P
J Med Virol; 2006 May; 78(5):598-607. PubMed ID: 16555269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diagnostic Performance and Comparative Evaluation of the Architect, Liaison, and Platelia Epstein-Barr Virus Antibody Assays.
Park Y; Park BG; Ha J; Kim HS
Ann Lab Med; 2018 Sep; 38(5):458-465. PubMed ID: 29797817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Evaluation of PCR results in the diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus infections].
Karadağ Geçgel S; Ersoy A; Sevinir BB; Sınırtaş M; Göral G
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2012 Oct; 46(4):594-606. PubMed ID: 23188573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Detection and quantitation of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA in EDTA whole blood samples using automated sample preparation and real time PCR.
Raggam RB; Wagner J; Bozic M; Michelin BD; Hammerschmidt S; Homberg C; Kessler HH
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010 Mar; 48(3):413-8. PubMed ID: 20001852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Human cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus infection in inflammatory bowel disease: need for mucosal viral load measurement.
Ciccocioppo R; Racca F; Paolucci S; Campanini G; Pozzi L; Betti E; Riboni R; Vanoli A; Baldanti F; Corazza GR
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Feb; 21(6):1915-26. PubMed ID: 25684960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of the new Abbott Real-Time EBV assay: fully automated quantification of EBV in whole blood by targeting BLLF1.
Lee JS; Yoon M; Kim MJ; Cho SI; Seong MW; Park SS; Kim JY
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2019 Jun; 94(2):135-139. PubMed ID: 30777343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of two highly automated DNA extraction systems for quantifying Epstein-Barr virus in whole blood.
Mengelle C; Legrand-Abravanel F; Mansuy JM; Barthe C; Da Silva I; Izopet J
J Clin Virol; 2008 Nov; 43(3):272-6. PubMed ID: 18819838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of six different specimen types for Epstein-Barr viral load quantification in peripheral blood of pediatric patients after heart transplantation or after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Ruf S; Behnke-Hall K; Gruhn B; Bauer J; Horn M; Beck J; Reiter A; Wagner HJ
J Clin Virol; 2012 Mar; 53(3):186-94. PubMed ID: 22182950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Epstein Barr viral load monitoring by quantitative PCR in renal transplant patients.
Merlino C; Cavallo R; Bergallo M; Giacchino F; Bollero C; Negro Ponzi A; Cavallo G
New Microbiol; 2003 Apr; 26(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 12737195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical evaluation of a quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction assay for diagnosis of primary Epstein-Barr virus infection in children.
Pitetti RD; Laus S; Wadowsky RM
Pediatr Infect Dis J; 2003 Aug; 22(8):736-9. PubMed ID: 12913777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of the artus Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) PCR kit and the Abbott RealTime EBV assay for measuring plasma EBV DNA loads in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients.
Vinuesa V; Solano C; Giménez E; Navarro D
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2017 May; 88(1):36-38. PubMed ID: 28274502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact of Fragmentation on Commutability of Epstein-Barr Virus and Cytomegalovirus Quantitative Standards.
Hayden RT; Tang L; Su Y; Cook L; Gu Z; Jerome KR; Boonyaratanakornkit J; Sam S; Pounds S; Caliendo AM
J Clin Microbiol; 2019 Dec; 58(1):. PubMed ID: 31619529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA in sera of patients with primary EBV infection.
Chan KH; Ng MH; Seto WH; Peiris JS
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Nov; 39(11):4152-4. PubMed ID: 11682546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Fluorescence in situ hybridization is superior for monitoring Epstein Barr viral load in infectious mononucleosis patients.
Cao P; Zhang M; Wang W; Dai Y; Sai B; Sun J; Wang L; Wang F; Li G; Xiang J
BMC Infect Dis; 2017 May; 17(1):323. PubMed ID: 28468603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
