These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29481104)

  • 21. Neural correlates of lexical access during visual word recognition.
    Binder JR; McKiernan KA; Parsons ME; Westbury CF; Possing ET; Kaufman JN; Buchanan L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Apr; 15(3):372-93. PubMed ID: 12729490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Semantic richness effects in lexical decision: The role of feedback.
    Yap MJ; Lim GY; Pexman PM
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Nov; 43(8):1148-67. PubMed ID: 26155967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Differential emotional processing in concrete and abstract words.
    Yao B; Keitel A; Bruce G; Scott GG; O'Donnell PJ; Sereno SC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1064-1074. PubMed ID: 29431458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The distinctiveness of emotion concepts: a comparison between emotion, abstract, and concrete words.
    Altarriba J; Bauer LM
    Am J Psychol; 2004; 117(3):389-410. PubMed ID: 15457808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quantifying sensorimotor experience: Body-object interaction ratings for more than 9,000 English words.
    Pexman PM; Muraki E; Sidhu DM; Siakaluk PD; Yap MJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):453-466. PubMed ID: 30484218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Semantic transparency in free stems: The effect of Orthography-Semantics Consistency on word recognition.
    Marelli M; Amenta S; Crepaldi D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(8):1571-83. PubMed ID: 25269473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Getting a grip on sensorimotor effects in lexical-semantic processing.
    Heard A; Madan CR; Protzner AB; Pexman PM
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Feb; 51(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 29967978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Spelling-to-sound correspondences affect acronym recognition processes.
    Playfoot D; Izura C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(5):1026-39. PubMed ID: 25337636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An exploration of the semantic network in Alzheimer's disease: Influence of emotion and concreteness of concepts.
    Giffard B; Laisney M; Desgranges B; Eustache F
    Cortex; 2015 Aug; 69():201-11. PubMed ID: 26094148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The role of orthographic neighborhood size effects in Chinese word recognition.
    Li MF; Lin WC; Chou TL; Yang FL; Wu JT
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2015 Jun; 44(3):219-36. PubMed ID: 25451553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mapping semantic space: property norms and semantic richness.
    Muraki EJ; Sidhu DM; Pexman PM
    Cogn Process; 2020 Nov; 21(4):637-649. PubMed ID: 31552508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Word recognition in Alzheimer's disease: Effects of semantic degeneration.
    Cuetos F; Arce N; Martínez C; Ellis AW
    J Neuropsychol; 2017 Mar; 11(1):26-39. PubMed ID: 26114914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A further examination of word frequency and age-of-acquisition effects in English lexical decision task performance: The role of frequency trajectory.
    Juhasz BJ; Yap MJ; Raoul A; Kaye M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):82-96. PubMed ID: 29683706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Semantic priming in deep-phonological dyslexia: contrasting effects of association and similarity upon abstract and concrete word reading.
    Crutch SJ; Warrington EK
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2007 Sep; 24(6):583-602. PubMed ID: 18416510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. BALDEY: A database of auditory lexical decisions.
    Ernestus M; Cutler A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(8):1469-88. PubMed ID: 25397865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Individual differences in automatic semantic priming.
    Andrews S; Lo S; Xia V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 May; 43(5):1025-1039. PubMed ID: 28263630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Parallel distributed processing and lexical-semantic effects in visual word recognition: are a few stages necessary?
    Borowsky R; Besner D
    Psychol Rev; 2006 Jan; 113(1):181-95; discussion 196-200. PubMed ID: 16478310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The effect of target degradation on detection of semantic satiation in a lexical decision task].
    Shimokido T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2004 Apr; 75(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 15724513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Semantic richness, concreteness, and object domain: an electrophysiological study.
    Amsel BD; Cree GS
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Jun; 67(2):117-29. PubMed ID: 23046416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Concreteness effects revisited: the influence of dynamic visual noise on memory for concrete and abstract words.
    Parker A; Dagnall N
    Memory; 2009 May; 17(4):397-410. PubMed ID: 19358014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.