These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29482753)

  • 1. Normal Variants and Pitfalls Encountered in PET Assessment of Gynecologic Malignancies.
    Yu JQ; Doss M; Alpaugh RK
    PET Clin; 2018 Apr; 13(2):249-268. PubMed ID: 29482753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. FDG-PET Assessment of Other Gynecologic Cancers.
    Faria S; Devine C; Viswanathan C; Javadi S; Korivi BR; Bhosale PR
    PET Clin; 2018 Apr; 13(2):203-223. PubMed ID: 29482750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. FDG PET/CT Pitfalls in Gynecologic and Genitourinary Oncologic Imaging.
    Lakhani A; Khan SR; Bharwani N; Stewart V; Rockall AG; Khan S; Barwick TD
    Radiographics; 2017; 37(2):577-594. PubMed ID: 28287942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Non-
    Kalshetty A; Basu S
    PET Clin; 2018 Apr; 13(2):239-248. PubMed ID: 29482752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative Assessment of Gynecologic Malignancies.
    Tripathy S; Parida GK; Kumar R
    PET Clin; 2018 Apr; 13(2):269-288. PubMed ID: 29482754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Role of PET Imaging in Gynecologic Radiation Oncology.
    Rao YJ; Grigsby PW
    PET Clin; 2018 Apr; 13(2):225-237. PubMed ID: 29482751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pitfalls in [¹⁸F]FDG PET imaging in gynecological malignancies.
    Hernandez Pampaloni M; Facchetti L; Nardo L
    Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Jun; 60(2):124-38. PubMed ID: 26937887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PET/MR imaging in gynecologic cancer: tips for differentiating normal gynecologic anatomy and benign pathology versus cancer.
    Sadowski EA; Pirasteh A; McMillan AB; Fowler KJ; Kusmirek JE
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Sep; 47(9):3189-3204. PubMed ID: 34687323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spectrum of PET-CT pelvic pitfalls in patients with gynecologic malignancies.
    Gorospe L; Jover-Díaz R; Vicente-Bártulos A
    Abdom Imaging; 2012 Dec; 37(6):1041-65. PubMed ID: 22349805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PET/MRI in Gynecologic Malignancy.
    Larson M; Lovrec P; Sadowski EA; Pirasteh A
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2023 Jul; 61(4):713-723. PubMed ID: 37169433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging for malignancies in women.
    Viswanathan C; Bhosale PR; Shah SN; Vikram R
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2013 Nov; 51(6):1111-25. PubMed ID: 24210447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Imaging of gynecologic malignancies with FDG PET-CT: case examples, physiologic activity, and pitfalls.
    De Gaetano AM; Calcagni ML; Rufini V; Valentini AL; Gui B; Giordano A; Bonomo L
    Abdom Imaging; 2009 Nov; 34(6):696-711. PubMed ID: 18791682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Added Value of FDG PET/MRI in Gynecologic Oncology: A Pictorial Review.
    Tarcha Z; Konstantinoff KS; Ince S; Fraum TJ; Sadowski EA; Bhosale PR; Derenoncourt PR; Zulfiqar M; Shetty AS; Ponisio MR; Mhlanga JC; Itani M
    Radiographics; 2023 Aug; 43(8):e230006. PubMed ID: 37410624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. FDG PET-CT of gynecologic cancers: pearls and pitfalls.
    Prabhakar HB; Kraeft JJ; Schorge JO; Scott JA; Lee SI
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(7):2472-85. PubMed ID: 25680500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET imaging for the detection of recurrent or metastatic gynecologic cancer.
    Khan N; Oriuchi N; Yoshizaki A; Kanuma T; Higuchi T; Endo K
    Ann Nucl Med; 2005 Apr; 19(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 15909494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pediatric FDG PET/CT: physiologic uptake, normal variants, and benign conditions.
    Shammas A; Lim R; Charron M
    Radiographics; 2009; 29(5):1467-86. PubMed ID: 19755606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Applications in Gynecologic Malignancies: A Comprehensive Review.
    Khessib T; Jha P; Davidzon GA; Iagaru A; Shah J
    Semin Nucl Med; 2024 Mar; 54(2):270-292. PubMed ID: 38342655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of FDG-PET/CT in gynecologic imaging: an updated guide to interpretation and challenges.
    Akin EA; Kuhl ES; Zeman RK
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Sep; 43(9):2474-2486. PubMed ID: 29520427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. False-positive uptake on 2-[¹⁸F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in oncological imaging.
    Culverwell AD; Scarsbrook AF; Chowdhury FU
    Clin Radiol; 2011 Apr; 66(4):366-82. PubMed ID: 21356398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pelvis: normal variants and benign findings in FDG-PET/CT imaging.
    Kohan A; Avril NE
    PET Clin; 2014 Apr; 9(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 25030281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.