165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29482754)
1. Quantitative Assessment of Gynecologic Malignancies.
Tripathy S; Parida GK; Kumar R
PET Clin; 2018 Apr; 13(2):269-288. PubMed ID: 29482754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Role of PET Imaging in Gynecologic Radiation Oncology.
Rao YJ; Grigsby PW
PET Clin; 2018 Apr; 13(2):225-237. PubMed ID: 29482751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. FDG-PET Assessment of Other Gynecologic Cancers.
Faria S; Devine C; Viswanathan C; Javadi S; Korivi BR; Bhosale PR
PET Clin; 2018 Apr; 13(2):203-223. PubMed ID: 29482750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Non-
Kalshetty A; Basu S
PET Clin; 2018 Apr; 13(2):239-248. PubMed ID: 29482752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of Optimal Quantification of FDG PET Imaging in the Clinical Practice of Radiology.
Ziai P; Hayeri MR; Salei A; Salavati A; Houshmand S; Alavi A; Teytelboym OM
Radiographics; 2016; 36(2):481-96. PubMed ID: 26963458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Positron emission tomography in gynecological malignancies.
Kumar R; Chauhan A; Jana S; Dadparvar S
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2006 Jul; 6(7):1033-44. PubMed ID: 16831075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Imaging of gynecologic tumors: comparison of (11)C-choline PET with (18)F-FDG PET.
Torizuka T; Kanno T; Futatsubashi M; Okada H; Yoshikawa E; Nakamura F; Takekuma M; Maeda M; Ouchi Y
J Nucl Med; 2003 Jul; 44(7):1051-6. PubMed ID: 12843219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. (
Scher N; Castelli J; Depeursinge A; Bourhis J; Prior JO; Herrera FG; Ozsahin M
Cancer Radiother; 2018 May; 22(3):229-235. PubMed ID: 29650390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. PET/CT in gynecologic malignancies.
Brunetti J
Radiol Clin North Am; 2013 Sep; 51(5):895-911. PubMed ID: 24010912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Normal Variants and Pitfalls Encountered in PET Assessment of Gynecologic Malignancies.
Yu JQ; Doss M; Alpaugh RK
PET Clin; 2018 Apr; 13(2):249-268. PubMed ID: 29482753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic value of total lesion glycolysis measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
Hong JH; Jung US; Min KJ; Lee JK; Kim S; Eo JS
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Aug; 37(8):843-8. PubMed ID: 27058362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of
Narayanan P; Sahdev A
Br J Radiol; 2017 Nov; 90(1079):20170283. PubMed ID: 28830238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Role of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Gynecologic Oncology.
Laifer-Narin SL; Genestine WF; Okechukwu NC; Hecht EM; Newhouse JH
PET Clin; 2018 Apr; 13(2):127-141. PubMed ID: 29482746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Role of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for the initial detection, staging, search for recurrences and restaging of gynaecological and breast cancers].
Grahek D; Barranger E; Daraï E; Uzan S; Talbot JN
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005 Jun; 33(6):371-81. PubMed ID: 15927502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. PET imaging in gynecologic malignancies.
Kumar R; Alavi A
Radiol Clin North Am; 2004 Nov; 42(6):1155-67, ix. PubMed ID: 15488564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic significance of standardized uptake value on F18-FDG PET/CT in patients with extranodal nasal type NK/T cell lymphoma: A multicenter, retrospective analysis.
Pak K; Kim BS; Kim K; Kim IJ; Jun S; Jeong YJ; Shim HK; Kim SD; Cho KS
Am J Otolaryngol; 2018; 39(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 29056243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gynecological cancers.
Avril N; Gourtsoyianni S; Reznek R
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 727():171-89. PubMed ID: 21331934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Normal and abnormal 18F-FDG endometrial and ovarian uptake in pre- and postmenopausal patients: assessment by PET/CT.
Lerman H; Metser U; Grisaru D; Fishman A; Lievshitz G; Even-Sapir E
J Nucl Med; 2004 Feb; 45(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 14960646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fludeoxyglucose F 18 PET/CT Assessment of Ovarian Cancer.
Marzola MC; Chondrogiannis S; Rubello D
PET Clin; 2018 Apr; 13(2):179-202. PubMed ID: 29482749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Diagnostic value of abdominal computerized tomography. After-care of gynecologic malignancies].
Stummvoll W; Holböck E; Schoissengeier A
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1994; 34(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 8019176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
