162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29484041)
1. Primary breast osteosarcoma mimicking calcified fibroadenoma on screening digital breast tomosynthesis mammogram.
Bennett DL; Merenda G; Schnepp S; Lowdermilk MC
Radiol Case Rep; 2017 Dec; 12(4):648-652. PubMed ID: 29484041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Staging of breast cancer and the advanced applications of digital mammogram: what the physician needs to know?
Helal MH; Mansour SM; Zaglol M; Salaleldin LA; Nada OM; Haggag MA
Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160717. PubMed ID: 28055247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of visibility of circumscribed masses on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) and 2D mammography: are circumscribed masses better visualized and assured of being benign on DBT?
Nakashima K; Uematsu T; Itoh T; Takahashi K; Nishimura S; Hayashi T; Sugino T
Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):570-577. PubMed ID: 27236817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Value of one-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in diagnostic workup of women with clinical signs and symptoms and in women recalled from screening.
Waldherr C; Cerny P; Altermatt HJ; Berclaz G; Ciriolo M; Buser K; Sonnenschein MJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jan; 200(1):226-31. PubMed ID: 23255766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Additional Diagnostic Mammographic Views for the Evaluation of Asymmetric Mammographic Densities.
Waheed H; Masroor I; Afzal S; Alvi MI; Jahanzeb S
Cureus; 2020 Aug; 12(8):e9637. PubMed ID: 32923238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison.
Spangler ML; Zuley ML; Sumkin JH; Abrams G; Ganott MA; Hakim C; Perrin R; Chough DM; Shah R; Gur D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):320-4. PubMed ID: 21257882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A case of primary extraskeletal osteosarcoma of the breast.
Kurata K; Anan K; Ishikawa N; Koga K; Saimura M; Nishihara K; Iwashita T; Mitsuyama S; Tamiya S; Watanabe H; Koga Y; Yamamoto H; Oda Y; Nakano T
Surg Case Rep; 2018 Sep; 4(1):121. PubMed ID: 30232644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis.
Skaane P
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jan; 24(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 27138386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Usefulness of digital breast tomosynthesis for non-calcified benign breast masses.
Yamamoto N; Yoshizako T; Yoshida R; Ando S; Nakamura M; Yoshikawa K; Itakura M; Kitagaki H
Clin Imaging; 2019; 54():84-90. PubMed ID: 30576939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. With the Advent of Tomosynthesis in the Workup of Mammographic Abnormality, is Spot Compression Mammography Now Obsolete? An Initial Clinical Experience.
Ni Mhuircheartaigh N; Coffey L; Fleming H; O' Doherty A; McNally S
Breast J; 2017 Sep; 23(5):509-518. PubMed ID: 28252233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Masses in the era of screening tomosynthesis: Is diagnostic ultrasound sufficient?
Choudhery S; Axmacher J; Conners AL; Geske J; Brandt K
Br J Radiol; 2019 Mar; 92(1095):20180801. PubMed ID: 30495975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsies on a digital breast 3D-tomosynthesis system.
Viala J; Gignier P; Perret B; Hovasse C; Hovasse D; Chancelier-Galan MD; Bornet G; Hamrouni A; Lasry JL; Convard JP
Breast J; 2013; 19(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 23252555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can the synthetic C view images be used in isolation for diagnosing breast malignancy without reviewing the entire digital breast tomosynthesis data set?
Murphy MC; Coffey L; O'Neill AC; Quinn C; Prichard R; McNally S
Ir J Med Sci; 2018 Nov; 187(4):1077-1081. PubMed ID: 29427198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Unusual Changing Calcification Patterns on the Mammogram in a Pure Mucocele-Like Lesion of the Breast: A Case Report.
Kim SJ; Kim JY
Am J Case Rep; 2019 Jun; 20():926-932. PubMed ID: 31253756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis on assessment of the lesions in dense breast: a preliminary study].
Li Y; Ye ZX; Wu T; An YH; Liu PF; Bao RX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 35(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 23648297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening programme (To-Be): a randomised, controlled trial.
Hofvind S; Holen ÅS; Aase HS; Houssami N; Sebuødegård S; Moger TA; Haldorsen IS; Akslen LA
Lancet Oncol; 2019 Jun; 20(6):795-805. PubMed ID: 31078459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Suspicious Calcifications From Various Populations: A Comparison With Full-field Digital Mammography.
Li J; Zhang H; Jiang H; Guo X; Zhang Y; Qi D; Guan J; Liu Z; Wu E; Luo S
Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2019; 17():82-89. PubMed ID: 30622686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Rare Case of Primary Breast Osteosarcoma Evaluated with Multiple Modalities.
Fujioka T; Mori M; Onishi I; Yashima Y; Yamaga E; Oyama J; Yokoyama K; Kubota K; Oda G; Nakagawa T; Tateishi U
Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Jun; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 34203255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
