192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29484524)
21. Effect of bite force on orthodontic mini-implants in the molar region: Finite element analysis.
Lee HJ; Lee KS; Kim MJ; Chun YS
Korean J Orthod; 2013 Oct; 43(5):218-24. PubMed ID: 24228236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis.
Himmlová L; Dostálová T; Kácovský A; Konvicková S
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jan; 91(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 14739889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Ideal placement of an implant considering the positional relationship to an opposing tooth in the first molar region: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Morita J; Wada M; Mameno T; Maeda Y; Ikebe K
Int J Implant Dent; 2020 Jul; 6(1):31. PubMed ID: 32607761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of implant- and occlusal load location on stress distribution in Locator attachments of mandibular overdenture. A finite element study.
Alvarez-Arenal A; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; deLlanos-Lanchares H; Martin-Fernandez E; Brizuela-Velasco A; Ellacuria-Echebarria J
J Adv Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 9(5):371-380. PubMed ID: 29142645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biomechanical effects of double or wide implants for single molar replacement in the posterior mandibular region.
Sato Y; Shindoi N; Hosokawa R; Tsuga K; Akagawa Y
J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Oct; 27(10):842-5. PubMed ID: 11065018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of the effect of the residual bone angulation on implant-supported fixed prosthesis in mandibular posterior edentulism. Part II: 3-D finite element stress analysis.
Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
Implant Dent; 2001; 10(4):238-45. PubMed ID: 11813664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The effect of platform switching on stress distribution in implants and periimplant bone studied by nonlinear finite element analysis.
Liu S; Tang C; Yu J; Dai W; Bao Y; Hu D
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1111-8. PubMed ID: 24882594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of Offset Implant Placement on the Stress Distribution Around a Dental Implant: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Siadat H; Hashemzadeh S; Geramy A; Bassir SH; Alikhasi M
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Dec; 41(6):646-51. PubMed ID: 24666333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The influence of occlusal loading location on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: A three-dimensional finite element study.
Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A; Sevimay M; Soykan E; Unsal E
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Feb; 91(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 14970760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Numerical simulation on the biomechanical interactions of tooth/implant-supported system under various occlusal forces with rigid/non-rigid connections.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Kuo YC
J Biomech; 2006; 39(3):453-63. PubMed ID: 16389085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants in the edentulous posterior mandible.
Shimura Y; Sato Y; Kitagawa N; Omori M
Int J Implant Dent; 2016 Dec; 2(1):17. PubMed ID: 27747709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of splinted prosthesis supported a wide implant or two implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Huang HL; Huang JS; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chang CH; Chen MY
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):466-72. PubMed ID: 16117772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Distribution patterns of occlusal contact areas on natural posterior teeth - Evaluations of a cross-sectional population-based study with the Greifswald Digital Analyzing System (GEDAS).
Kordaß B; Behrendt C; Amlang A; Hugger S; Hugger A; Ruge S; Samietz S
Ann Anat; 2023 Oct; 250():152112. PubMed ID: 37301414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of implant-supported prosthesis on the bite force and masticatory efficiency in subjects with shortened dental arches.
Meena A; Jain V; Singh N; Arora N; Jha R
J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Feb; 41(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 24372288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of Maximum Principal Stress, Von Mises Stress, and Deformation on Surrounding Mandibular Bone During Insertion of an Implant: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study.
Yemineni BC; Mahendra J; Nasina J; Mahendra L; Shivasubramanian L; Perika SB
Cureus; 2020 Jul; 12(7):e9430. PubMed ID: 32864255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Treatment planning of implants when 3 mandibular posterior teeth are missing: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Chen XY; Zhang CY; Nie EM; Zhang MC
Implant Dent; 2012 Aug; 21(4):340-3. PubMed ID: 22814561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Liu J; Pan S; Dong J; Mo Z; Fan Y; Feng H
J Dent; 2013 Mar; 41(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 23160036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Three-dimensional finite element analyses of four designs of a high-strength silicon nitride implant.
Lin S; Shi S; LeGeros RZ; LeGeros JP
Implant Dent; 2000; 9(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 11307234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Photoelastic stress analysis of implant-tooth connected prostheses with segmented and nonsegmented abutments.
Ochiai KT; Ozawa S; Caputo AA; Nishimura RD
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 May; 89(5):495-502. PubMed ID: 12806328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. 3D Finite Element Analysis to Assess the Stress Distribution Pattern in Mandibular Implant-supported Overdenture with Different Bar Heights.
Joshi S; Kumar S; Jain S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Jul; 20(7):794-800. PubMed ID: 31597798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
