These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29484968)
1. DNA Methylation Markers Improve the Sensitivity of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography-Based Brushing Cytology in Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Prachayakul V; Kanchanapermpoon J; Thuwajit C; Boonyaarunnate T; Pongpaibul A; Chobson P; Thuwajit P Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 16(6):1252-1258. PubMed ID: 29484968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic power of DNA methylation markers suggestive of cholangiocarcinoma in ERCP-based brush cytology. Prachayakul V; Rugivarodom M; Nopjaroonsri P; Cheirsilpa K; Chang A; Kamolhan T; Boonyaarunnate T; Thuwajit C; Thuwajit P Gastrointest Endosc; 2022 Jan; 95(1):123-130.e1. PubMed ID: 34265285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monocentric study of bile aspiration associated with biliary brushing performed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in 239 patients with symptomatic biliary stricture. Fior-Gozlan M; Giovannini D; Rabeyrin M; Mc Leer-Florin A; Laverrière MH; Bichard P Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 May; 124(5):330-9. PubMed ID: 26700399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Investigation of Factors Affecting the Sensitivity of Bile Duct Brush Cytology. Kobayashi M; Ryozawa S; Araki R; Nagata K; Tanisaka Y; Fujita A; Kobatake T Intern Med; 2019 Feb; 58(3):329-335. PubMed ID: 30146607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative analysis of VEGF-C mRNA of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with real-time PCR using samples obtained during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Dobashi A; Imazu H; Tatsumi N; Okabe M; Ang TL; Tajiri H Scand J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jul; 48(7):848-55. PubMed ID: 23721191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An extended fluorescence in situ hybridization approach for the cytogenetic study of cholangiocarcinoma on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography brushing cytology preparations. Vasilieva LE; Papadhimitriou SI; Alexopoulou A; Pavlidis D; Kostopoulos I; Georgiakaki M; Xinopoulos D; Romanos A; Dourakis SP Hum Pathol; 2013 Oct; 44(10):2173-9. PubMed ID: 23845469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methylation profiles of multiple CpG island loci in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma versus those of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. Kim BH; Cho NY; Choi M; Lee S; Jang JJ; Kang GH Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2007 Jun; 131(6):923-30. PubMed ID: 17550320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Triple-tissue sampling during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography increases the overall diagnostic sensitivity for cholangiocarcinoma. Lee SJ; Lee YS; Lee MG; Lee SH; Shin E; Hwang JH Gut Liver; 2014 Nov; 8(6):669-73. PubMed ID: 25368755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. UroVysion Multi-Target Fluorescence in situ Hybridization Assay for the Detection of Malignant Bile Duct Brushing Specimens: A Comparison with Routine Cytology. Zhai J Acta Cytol; 2018; 62(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 29734171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening primary sclerosing cholangitis and biliary dysplasia with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and brush cytology: risk factors for biliary neoplasia. Boyd S; Tenca A; Jokelainen K; Mustonen H; Krogerus L; Arola J; Färkkilä MA Endoscopy; 2016 May; 48(5):432-9. PubMed ID: 26808393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Promoter methylation profiles of tumor suppressor genes in intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Yang B; House MG; Guo M; Herman JG; Clark DP Mod Pathol; 2005 Mar; 18(3):412-20. PubMed ID: 15467712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endoscopic cytology in biliary strictures. Personal experience. Geraci G; Pisello F; Arnone E; Modica G; Sciumè C G Chir; 2008 Oct; 29(10):403-6. PubMed ID: 18947461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictors for detection of cancer in patients with indeterminate biliary stricture and atypical cells on endoscopic retrograde brush cytology. Navaneethan U; Singh T; Gutierrez NG; Jegadeesan R; Venkatesh PG; Brainard J; Vargo JJ; Parsi MA J Dig Dis; 2014 May; 15(5):268-75. PubMed ID: 24612456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endobiliary brush cytology during percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage in patients with obstructive jaundice. Xing GS; Geng JC; Han XW; Dai JH; Wu CY Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2005 Feb; 4(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 15730930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Calcium-binding protein S100P is a novel diagnostic marker of cholangiocarcinoma. Hamada S; Satoh K; Hirota M; Kanno A; Ishida K; Umino J; Ito H; Kikuta K; Kume K; Masamune A; Katayose Y; Unno M; Shimosegawa T Cancer Sci; 2011 Jan; 102(1):150-6. PubMed ID: 21029254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of single operator cholangioscopy on accuracy of bile duct cytology. Aly FZ; Mostofizadeh S; Jawaid S; Knapik J; Mukhtar F; Klein R Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Dec; 48(12):1230-1236. PubMed ID: 32770823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endoscopic transpapillary brush cytology and forceps biopsy in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Weber A; von Weyhern C; Fend F; Schneider J; Neu B; Meining A; Weidenbach H; Schmid RM; Prinz C World J Gastroenterol; 2008 Feb; 14(7):1097-101. PubMed ID: 18286693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective evaluation of brush cytology of biliary strictures during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Glasbrenner B; Ardan M; Boeck W; Preclik G; Möller P; Adler G Endoscopy; 1999 Nov; 31(9):712-7. PubMed ID: 10604612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]