530 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29485251)
1. Laparoscopic versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy for treatment of multi-compartmental pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review.
Ichikawa M; Kaseki H; Akira S
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2018 Feb; 11(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 29485251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
van Oudheusden AMJ; Eissing J; Terink IM; Vink MDH; van Kuijk SMJ; Bongers MY; Coolen AWM
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 36112182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgical management of female pelvic organ prolapse with and without urinary incontinence: A single center experience.
Cormio L; Mancini V; Liuzzi G; d'Altilia N; Carrieri G
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Sep; 96(39):e7914. PubMed ID: 28953613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse, a randomized controlled trial: SALTO-2 trial, study protocol.
Coolen AWM; van IJsselmuiden MN; van Oudheusden AMJ; Veen J; van Eijndhoven HWF; Mol BWJ; Roovers JP; Bongers MY
BMC Womens Health; 2017 Jul; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 28747206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a review.
Ganatra AM; Rozet F; Sanchez-Salas R; Barret E; Galiano M; Cathelineau X; Vallancien G
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1089-103. PubMed ID: 19201521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
Costantini E; Mearini L; Lazzeri M; Bini V; Nunzi E; di Biase M; Porena M
J Urol; 2016 Jul; 196(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 26780167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Mid-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy of combined transabdominal-transvaginal approach in the treatment of stage Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse].
Liang XZ; Xu LZ; Chen LQ; Wang S; Lin XT; Zhang XW
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 54(3):160-165. PubMed ID: 30893716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus pelvic organ prolapse suspension for surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective study.
Tagliaferri V; Taccaliti C; Romano F; D'Asta M; Martulli B; Gentile C; Legge F; Ruggieri S; Guido M
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Aug; 42(6):2075-2081. PubMed ID: 35129036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Li C; Dai Z; Shu H
Trials; 2018 Mar; 19(1):160. PubMed ID: 29506566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transvaginal single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study.
Li J; Sima Y; Hu C; Wang X; Lu Z; Hua K; Chen Y
BMC Surg; 2022 Mar; 22(1):82. PubMed ID: 35246079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two parallel, pragmatic, UK multicentre, randomised controlled trials comparing surgical options for upper compartment (vault or uterine) pelvic organ prolapse (the VUE Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Glazener C; Constable L; Hemming C; Breeman S; Elders A; Cooper K; Freeman R; Smith AR; Hagen S; McDonald A; McPherson G; Montgomery I; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; Goulao B; Norrie J
Trials; 2016 Sep; 17(1):441. PubMed ID: 27609058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Coolen AWM; Bui BN; Dietz V; Wang R; van Montfoort APA; Mol BWJ; Roovers JWR; Bongers MY
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1767-1783. PubMed ID: 29038834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women.
Geoffrion R; Larouche M
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Apr; 43(4):511-523.e1. PubMed ID: 33548503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Abdominal Versus Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Campbell P; Cloney L; Jha S
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2016 Aug; 71(7):435-42. PubMed ID: 27436178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What to Do With Recurrent Prolapse After Vaginal Mesh Failure?
Norinho de Oliveira P; Bourdel N; Rabischong B; Canis M; Botchorishvili R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 23(2):161-2. PubMed ID: 26408228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Complications and clinical outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Sato H; Abe H; Ikeda A; Miyagawa T; Sato K
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Jan; 41(1):128-132. PubMed ID: 32148120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal apical prolapse: evidence-based surgery.
Parkes IL; Shveiky D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):546-57. PubMed ID: 24462593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: how low does the mesh go?
Wong V; Guzman Rojas R; Shek KL; Chou D; Moore KH; Dietz HP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):404-408. PubMed ID: 26877210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A review of the current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Lee RK; Mottrie A; Payne CK; Waltregny D
Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1128-37. PubMed ID: 24433811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
