BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29485404)

  • 1. Frontal cortex selects representations of the talker's mouth to aid in speech perception.
    Ozker M; Yoshor D; Beauchamp MS
    Elife; 2018 Feb; 7():. PubMed ID: 29485404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The visual speech head start improves perception and reduces superior temporal cortex responses to auditory speech.
    Karas PJ; Magnotti JF; Metzger BA; Zhu LL; Smith KB; Yoshor D; Beauchamp MS
    Elife; 2019 Aug; 8():. PubMed ID: 31393261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increased Connectivity among Sensory and Motor Regions during Visual and Audiovisual Speech Perception.
    Peelle JE; Spehar B; Jones MS; McConkey S; Myerson J; Hale S; Sommers MS; Tye-Murray N
    J Neurosci; 2022 Jan; 42(3):435-442. PubMed ID: 34815317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mouth and Voice: A Relationship between Visual and Auditory Preference in the Human Superior Temporal Sulcus.
    Zhu LL; Beauchamp MS
    J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37(10):2697-2708. PubMed ID: 28179553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Double Dissociation between Anterior and Posterior Superior Temporal Gyrus for Processing Audiovisual Speech Demonstrated by Electrocorticography.
    Ozker M; Schepers IM; Magnotti JF; Yoshor D; Beauchamp MS
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 29(6):1044-1060. PubMed ID: 28253074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interaction of bottom-up and top-down neural mechanisms in spatial multi-talker speech perception.
    Patel P; van der Heijden K; Bickel S; Herrero JL; Mehta AD; Mesgarani N
    Curr Biol; 2022 Sep; 32(18):3971-3986.e4. PubMed ID: 35973430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Causal Inference Model Explains Perception of the McGurk Effect and Other Incongruent Audiovisual Speech.
    Magnotti JF; Beauchamp MS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 13(2):e1005229. PubMed ID: 28207734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A link between individual differences in multisensory speech perception and eye movements.
    Gurler D; Doyle N; Walker E; Magnotti J; Beauchamp M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1333-41. PubMed ID: 25810157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Joint population coding and temporal coherence link an attended talker's voice and location features in naturalistic multi-talker scenes.
    van der Heijden K; Patel P; Bickel S; Herrero JL; Mehta AD; Mesgarani N
    bioRxiv; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38798551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gaze patterns and audiovisual speech enhancement.
    Yi A; Wong W; Eizenman M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 56(2):471-80. PubMed ID: 23275394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of left inferior frontal cortex during audiovisual speech perception in infants.
    Altvater-Mackensen N; Grossmann T
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jun; 133():14-20. PubMed ID: 26946090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contributions of local speech encoding and functional connectivity to audio-visual speech perception.
    Giordano BL; Ince RAA; Gross J; Schyns PG; Panzeri S; Kayser C
    Elife; 2017 Jun; 6():. PubMed ID: 28590903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integrating speech information across talkers, gender, and sensory modality: female faces and male voices in the McGurk effect.
    Green KP; Kuhl PK; Meltzoff AN; Stevens EB
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Dec; 50(6):524-36. PubMed ID: 1780200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Audio-visual speech perception off the top of the head.
    Davis C; Kim J
    Cognition; 2006 Jul; 100(3):B21-31. PubMed ID: 16289070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selective attention to a talker's mouth in infancy: role of audiovisual temporal synchrony and linguistic experience.
    Hillairet de Boisferon A; Tift AH; Minar NJ; Lewkowicz DJ
    Dev Sci; 2017 May; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 26743437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cross-modal enhancement of speech detection in young and older adults: does signal content matter?
    Tye-Murray N; Spehar B; Myerson J; Sommers MS; Hale S
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):650-5. PubMed ID: 21478751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gaze behavior in audiovisual speech perception: the influence of ocular fixations on the McGurk effect.
    Paré M; Richler RC; ten Hove M; Munhall KG
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 May; 65(4):553-67. PubMed ID: 12812278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrocorticography reveals continuous auditory and visual speech tracking in temporal and occipital cortex.
    Micheli C; Schepers IM; Ozker M; Yoshor D; Beauchamp MS; Rieger JW
    Eur J Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 51(5):1364-1376. PubMed ID: 29888819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Free viewing of talking faces reveals mouth and eye preferring regions of the human superior temporal sulcus.
    Rennig J; Beauchamp MS
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():25-36. PubMed ID: 30092347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inside bilingualism: Language background modulates selective attention to a talker's mouth.
    Birulés J; Bosch L; Brieke R; Pons F; Lewkowicz DJ
    Dev Sci; 2019 May; 22(3):e12755. PubMed ID: 30251757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.