These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29486426)

  • 1. The effects of stakeholder involvement on perceptions of an evaluation's credibility.
    Jacobson MR; Azzam T
    Eval Program Plann; 2018 Jun; 68():64-73. PubMed ID: 29486426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Working with evaluation stakeholders: A rationale, step-wise approach and toolkit.
    Bryson JM; Patton MQ; Bowman RA
    Eval Program Plann; 2011 Feb; 34(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 20674980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Putting Rigorous Evidence Within Reach: Lessons Learned from the New Heights Evaluation.
    Zief S; Deke J; Neild R
    Matern Child Health J; 2020 Sep; 24(Suppl 2):119-124. PubMed ID: 32212033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Empowerment evaluation: An approach that has literally altered the landscape of evaluation.
    Donaldson SI
    Eval Program Plann; 2017 Aug; 63():136-137. PubMed ID: 27940050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methodological Credibility: An Empirical Investigation of the Public's Perception of Evaluation Findings and Methods.
    Jacobson MR; Azzam T
    Eval Rev; 2016 Feb; 40(1):29-60. PubMed ID: 27460880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Failure of intervention or failure of evaluation: a meta-evaluation of the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign Evaluation.
    Magura S
    Subst Use Misuse; 2012; 47(13-14):1414-20. PubMed ID: 23186426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reported credibility techniques in higher education evaluation studies that use qualitative methods: A research synthesis.
    Liao H; Hitchcock J
    Eval Program Plann; 2018 Jun; 68():157-165. PubMed ID: 29602062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stakeholder Involvement in Evaluation: Does it Affect Observers' Perceptions of an Evaluation? And Which Stakeholder Group(s) Do People Think Should to Participate?
    Mark MM; Allen JB; Goodwin JL
    Eval Rev; 2021; 45(3-4):166-190. PubMed ID: 34693763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conducting evaluation in contested terrain: challenges, methodology and approach in an American context.
    Cohen BB
    Eval Program Plann; 2012 Feb; 35(1):189-98. PubMed ID: 21256592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Producing credible evaluations of federal health programs.
    Chelimsky E
    Eval Health Prof; 1996 Sep; 19(3):264-79. PubMed ID: 10186915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Through a Culturally Competent Lens: Why the Program Evaluation Standards Matter.
    Gill S; Kuwahara R; Wilce M
    Health Promot Pract; 2016 Jan; 17(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 26679506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Utilization of internal evaluation results by community mental health organizations: Credibility in different forms.
    Yusa A; Hynie M; Mitchell S
    Eval Program Plann; 2016 Feb; 54():11-8. PubMed ID: 26476859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Understanding evaluations of home visitation programs.
    Gomby DS
    Future Child; 1999; 9(1):27-43. PubMed ID: 10414009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of medical simulations.
    Bewley WL; O'Neil HF
    Mil Med; 2013 Oct; 178(10 Suppl):64-75. PubMed ID: 24084307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A method to obtain a randomized control group where it seems impossible. A case study in program evaluation.
    Zhu SH
    Eval Rev; 1999 Aug; 23(4):363-77. PubMed ID: 10558391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The bottom-up approach to integrative validity: a new perspective for program evaluation.
    Chen HT
    Eval Program Plann; 2010 Aug; 33(3):205-14. PubMed ID: 19931908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating food stamp nutrition education: a view from the field of program evaluation.
    Taylor-Powell E
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2006; 38(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 16595273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Taking stock of four decades of quantitative research on stakeholder participation and evaluation use: a systematic map.
    Daigneault PM
    Eval Program Plann; 2014 Aug; 45():171-81. PubMed ID: 24879310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Serendipity and pseudoscience. A look at health-related program evaluation.
    Holmes D; Teresi J; Ory M
    Eval Health Prof; 1993 Dec; 16(4):363-78. PubMed ID: 10130550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Obstacles to conducting program evaluations: implications for public health evaluators.
    Holosko MJ
    J Health Soc Policy; 1996; 8(1):91-101. PubMed ID: 10162908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.