These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29486426)

  • 21. [Meta-evaluation of a participantory evaluation conducted by municipal health administrators with a focus on "utility"].
    Almeida CA; Tanaka OY
    Cad Saude Publica; 2017 Mar; 33(2):e00105615. PubMed ID: 28380123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Output or impact: what should we be evaluating in research programs?
    Scanes CG
    Poult Sci; 2009 Nov; 88(11):2243. PubMed ID: 19834071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Members' perceptions of community care network partnerships' effectiveness.
    Hasnain-Wynia R; Sofaer S; Bazzoli GJ; Alexander JA; Shortell SM; Conrad DA; Chan B; Zukoski AP; Sweney J
    Med Care Res Rev; 2003 Dec; 60(4 Suppl):40S-62S. PubMed ID: 14687429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Uniform presentation of process evaluation results facilitates the evaluation of complex interventions: development of a graph.
    Bakker FC; Persoon A; Schoon Y; Olde Rikkert MG
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2015 Feb; 21(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 25312557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Design of a basic system of indicators for monitoring and evaluating Spanish Cooperation's Culture and Development Strategy.
    Coll-Serrano V; Carrasco-Arroyo S; Blasco-Blasco O; Vila-Lladosa L
    Eval Rev; 2012 Aug; 36(4):272-302. PubMed ID: 23036912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Research issues in CPD.
    Morrison J
    Lancet; 2003 Aug; 362(9381):410. PubMed ID: 12907032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Using propensity scoring to estimate program-related subgroup impacts in experimental program evaluations.
    Schochet PZ; Burghardt J
    Eval Rev; 2007 Apr; 31(2):95-120. PubMed ID: 17356179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An exploratory review of pre-qualification interprofessional education evaluations.
    Thistlethwaite J; Kumar K; Moran M; Saunders R; Carr S
    J Interprof Care; 2015; 29(4):292-7. PubMed ID: 25431833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How program evaluators use and learn to use rubrics to make evaluative reasoning explicit.
    Martens KSR
    Eval Program Plann; 2018 Aug; 69():25-32. PubMed ID: 29660495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Collaborative evaluation within a framework of stakeholder-oriented evaluation approaches.
    O'Sullivan RG
    Eval Program Plann; 2012 Nov; 35(4):518-22. PubMed ID: 22364849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Issues in the evaluation of small-scale adult day care programs.
    Neufeld A; Strang V
    Int J Nurs Stud; 1992 Aug; 29(3):261-73. PubMed ID: 1517027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Advocacy evaluation: what it is and where to find out more about it.
    Fagen MC; Reed E; Kaye JW; Jack L
    Health Promot Pract; 2009 Oct; 10(4):482-4. PubMed ID: 19808999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [The evaluation of health programs from the perspective of qualitative methodology].
    Sánchez-Candamio M
    Aten Primaria; 1999 Nov; 24(8):487-91. PubMed ID: 10630032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Staff's perceptions of the use of evidence-based physical activity promotion strategies for promoting girls' physical activity at afterschool programs: a qualitative study.
    Dinkel D; Huberty J; Beets M; Tibbits M
    Eval Program Plann; 2014 Aug; 45():102-9. PubMed ID: 24811234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Integrating qualitative and quantitative components in evaluation of case management.
    Willenbring ML
    NIDA Res Monogr; 1992; 127():223-50. PubMed ID: 1435997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Developing research plans and outcome measures for oral-systemic project assessments.
    Williams KB
    J Dent Hyg; 2009; 83(4):190-2. PubMed ID: 19909642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The importance of perspective: evaluation of hospice care from multiple stakeholders.
    Hiatt K; Stelle C; Mulsow M; Pearson Scott J
    Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2007; 24(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17601833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparing rating paradigms for evidence-based program registers in behavioral health: evidentiary criteria and implications for assessing programs.
    Means SN; Magura S; Burkhardt JT; Schröter DC; Coryn CL
    Eval Program Plann; 2015 Feb; 48():100-16. PubMed ID: 25450778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A modified stakeholder participation assessment framework for design thinking in health innovation.
    Hendricks S; Conrad N; Douglas TS; Mutsvangwa T
    Healthc (Amst); 2018 Sep; 6(3):191-196. PubMed ID: 29960878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Program Evaluation's "Next of Kin".
    Balmer DF; Klein MD; Li ST; Gusic ME
    Acad Med; 2022 Oct; 97(10):1573-1574. PubMed ID: 36198164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.