These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. The unique character of involvement in multi-site evaluation settings. Toal SA; King JA; Johnson K; Lawrenz F Eval Program Plann; 2009 May; 32(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 19062092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The development and application of audit criteria for assessing knowledge exchange plans in health research grant applications. Ruppertsberg AI; Ward V; Ridout A; Foy R Implement Sci; 2014 Jul; 9():93. PubMed ID: 25017548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. More appropriate evaluation methods for community-level health interventions. Introduction to the special issue. McKinlay JB Eval Rev; 1996 Jun; 20(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 10182203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Trustworthiness in evaluation practice: an emphasis on the relational. Rallis SF; Rossman GB; Gajda R Eval Program Plann; 2007 Nov; 30(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 17945140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Qualitative evaluation of the project P.A.T.H.S. based on the perceptions of the program participants. Shek DT; Lee TY; Siu A; Lam CM ScientificWorldJournal; 2006 Nov; 6():2254-63. PubMed ID: 17370020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Involving stakeholders in the evaluation of community alcohol projects: finding a balance between subjective insight and objective facts. Boots K; Midford R Subst Use Misuse; 2007; 42(12-13):1955-69. PubMed ID: 18075920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Patients' and staff's perceptions of the psychiatric ward environment. Rossberg JI; Friis S Psychiatr Serv; 2004 Jul; 55(7):798-803. PubMed ID: 15232020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Design of a study evaluating the effects, health economics, and stakeholder perspectives of a multi-component occupational rehabilitation program with an added workplace intervention - a study protocol. Rise MB; Skagseth M; Klevanger NE; Aasdahl L; Borchgrevink P; Jensen C; Tenggren H; Halsteinli V; Jacobsen TN; Løland SB; Johnsen R; Fimland MS BMC Public Health; 2018 Feb; 18(1):219. PubMed ID: 29402253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. What makes professors appear credible: The effect of demographic characteristics and ideological beliefs. Zhu LL; Aquino K; Vadera AK J Appl Psychol; 2016 Jun; 101(6):862-80. PubMed ID: 26949817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Multiple and mixed methods in formative evaluation: Is more better? Reflections from a South African study. Odendaal W; Atkins S; Lewin S BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Dec; 16(1):173. PubMed ID: 27978818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Using developmental evaluation as a system of organizational learning: An example from San Francisco. Shea J; Taylor T Eval Program Plann; 2017 Dec; 65():84-93. PubMed ID: 28750302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Violence in families: assessing prevention and treatment programs. Health Serv Res; 1998 Oct; 33(4 Pt 1):x-xii. PubMed ID: 9776934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Methods controversies and agreement. Design and interpretation of evaluations. Med Care; 1996 Dec; 34(12 Suppl):DS146-50. PubMed ID: 8999201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. When does a conceptual framework become a theory? Reflections from an accidental theorist. Cousins JB Eval Program Plann; 2013 Jun; 38():67-70. PubMed ID: 22497774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Evaluation's vital role in healthier school meals. Johner NM J Am Diet Assoc; 2009 Feb; 109(2 Suppl):S18-9. PubMed ID: 19166669 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Quality assessment of medical research and education. Eriksson H Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1992; 8(3):479-89. PubMed ID: 1399332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]