These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29486778)

  • 41. Tracking the non-stationary neuron tuning by dual Kalman filter for brain machine interfaces decoding.
    Wang Y; Principe JC
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():1720-3. PubMed ID: 19163011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Neuroprosthetic Decoder Training as Imitation Learning.
    Merel J; Carlson D; Paninski L; Cunningham JP
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 May; 12(5):e1004948. PubMed ID: 27191387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Advantages of closed-loop calibration in intracortical brain-computer interfaces for people with tetraplegia.
    Jarosiewicz B; Masse NY; Bacher D; Cash SS; Eskandar E; Friehs G; Donoghue JP; Hochberg LR
    J Neural Eng; 2013 Aug; 10(4):046012. PubMed ID: 23838067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Adaptive offset correction for intracortical brain-computer interfaces.
    Homer ML; Perge JA; Black MJ; Harrison MT; Cash SS; Hochberg LR
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 Mar; 22(2):239-48. PubMed ID: 24196868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Online adaptive decoding of intended movements with a hybrid kinetic and kinematic brain machine interface.
    Suminski AJ; Fagg AH; Willett FR; Bodenhamer M; Hatsopoulos NG
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1583-6. PubMed ID: 24110004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Performance sustaining intracortical neural prostheses.
    Nuyujukian P; Kao JC; Fan JM; Stavisky SD; Ryu SI; Shenoy KV
    J Neural Eng; 2014 Dec; 11(6):066003. PubMed ID: 25307561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Motor cortical decoding performance depends on controlled system order.
    Matlack C; Haddock A; Moritz CT; Chizeck HJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():2553-6. PubMed ID: 25570511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Spike Rate Estimation Using Bayesian Adaptive Kernel Smoother (BAKS) and Its Application to Brain Machine Interfaces.
    Ahmadi N; Constandinou TG; Bouganis CS
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():2547-2550. PubMed ID: 30440927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Neural Decoding Forelimb Trajectory Using Evolutionary Neural Networks with Feedback-Error-Learning Schemes.
    Lin YC; Chou C; Yang SH; Lai HY; Lo YC; Chen YY
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():2539-2542. PubMed ID: 30440925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. An empirical comparison of neural networks and machine learning algorithms for EEG gait decoding.
    Nakagome S; Luu TP; He Y; Ravindran AS; Contreras-Vidal JL
    Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):4372. PubMed ID: 32152333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Design and analysis of closed-loop decoder adaptation algorithms for brain-machine interfaces.
    Dangi S; Orsborn AL; Moorman HG; Carmena JM
    Neural Comput; 2013 Jul; 25(7):1693-731. PubMed ID: 23607558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Overcoming Long-Term Variability in Local Field Potentials Using an Adaptive Decoder.
    Tadipatri VA; Tewfik AH; Pellizzer G; Ashe J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Feb; 64(2):319-328. PubMed ID: 27116730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Influence of artifacts on movement intention decoding from EEG activity in severely paralyzed stroke patients.
    Lopez-Larraz E; Bibian C; Birbaumer N; Ramos-Murguialday A
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():901-906. PubMed ID: 28813935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A 128-Channel Extreme Learning Machine-Based Neural Decoder for Brain Machine Interfaces.
    Chen Y; Yao E; Basu A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst; 2016 Jun; 10(3):679-92. PubMed ID: 26672048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Population decoding in rat barrel cortex: optimizing the linear readout of correlated population responses.
    Adibi M; McDonald JS; Clifford CW; Arabzadeh E
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2014 Jan; 10(1):e1003415. PubMed ID: 24391487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Augmenting intracortical brain-machine interface with neurally driven error detectors.
    Even-Chen N; Stavisky SD; Kao JC; Ryu SI; Shenoy KV
    J Neural Eng; 2017 Dec; 14(6):066007. PubMed ID: 29130452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Encoder-decoder optimization for brain-computer interfaces.
    Merel J; Pianto DM; Cunningham JP; Paninski L
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Jun; 11(6):e1004288. PubMed ID: 26029919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Tracking Neural Modulation Depth by Dual Sequential Monte Carlo Estimation on Point Processes for Brain-Machine Interfaces.
    Wang Y; She X; Liao Y; Li H; Zhang Q; Zhang S; Zheng X; Principe J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2016 Aug; 63(8):1728-41. PubMed ID: 26584486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Unsupervised adaptation of brain-machine interface decoders.
    Gürel T; Mehring C
    Front Neurosci; 2012; 6():164. PubMed ID: 23162425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Brain-Machine Interface Control Algorithms.
    Shanechi MM
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Oct; 25(10):1725-1734. PubMed ID: 28113323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.