240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29486802)
1. Sex composition and its impact on future childbearing: a longitudinal study from urban Uttar Pradesh.
Rajan S; Nanda P; Calhoun LM; Speizer IS
Reprod Health; 2018 Feb; 15(1):35. PubMed ID: 29486802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of family sex composition on fertility desires and family planning behaviors in urban Uttar Pradesh, India.
Calhoun LM; Nanda P; Speizer IS; Jain M
Reprod Health; 2013 Sep; 10():48. PubMed ID: 24025670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of son preference on the contraceptive use and fertility of Sri Lankan women.
De Silva WI
J Biosoc Sci; 1993 Jul; 25(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 8360227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sex composition of living children in a matrilineal inheritance system and its association with pregnancy intendedness and postpartum family planning intentions in rural Ghana.
Eliason S; Baiden F; Tuoyire DA; Awusabo-Asare K
Reprod Health; 2018 Nov; 15(1):187. PubMed ID: 30413219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The desire for sons and excess fertility: a household-level analysis of parity progression in India.
Chaudhuri S
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2012 Dec; 38(4):178-86. PubMed ID: 23318167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Son preference, fertility desire and contraceptive use in two largest cities of Pakistan.
Farooqui MN
Pak Popul Rev; 1990; 1(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 12317086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The relationship of family size and composition to fertility desires, contraceptive adoption and method choice in South Asia.
Jayaraman A; Mishra V; Arnold F
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2009 Mar; 35(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 19465346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The association between early in marriage fertility pressure from in-laws' and family planning behaviors, among married adolescent girls in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, India.
Dixit A; Bhan N; Benmarhnia T; Reed E; Kiene SM; Silverman J; Raj A
Reprod Health; 2021 Mar; 18(1):60. PubMed ID: 33750403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement of unmet need for family planning: longitudinal analysis of the impact of fertility desires on subsequent childbearing behaviors among urban women from Uttar Pradesh, India.
Speizer IS; Calhoun LM; Hoke T; Sengupta R
Contraception; 2013 Oct; 88(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 23706906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Son preference and reproductive behaviour in rural Punjab.
Malhi P; Singh S
Guru Nanak J Sociol; 1995 Oct; 16(2):31-40. PubMed ID: 12292072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. IMPACT OF SEX COMPOSITION OF LIVING CHILDREN AND COUPLES' AGREEMENT ON SUBSEQUENT FERTILITY IN INDIA.
Kastor A; Chatterjee S
J Biosoc Sci; 2018 Sep; 50(5):666-682. PubMed ID: 29168438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Son Preference and the Reproductive Behavior of Rural-Urban Migrant Women of Childbearing Age in China: Empirical Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Data.
Wang X; Nie W; Liu P
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 32384759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Consistency and predictive ability of fertility preference indicators: longitudinal evidence from rural India.
Roy TK; Sinha RK; Koenig M; Mohanty SK; Patel SK
Int Fam Plan Perspect; 2008 Sep; 34(3):138-45. PubMed ID: 18957356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is son preference slowing down India's transition to low fertility?
Mutharayappa R; Choe MK; Arnold F; Roy TK
Natl Fam Health Surv Bull; 1997 Jan; (4):1-4. PubMed ID: 12292159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Son and daughter preferences in Benighat, Nepal: implications for fertility transition.
Niraula BB; Morgan SP
Soc Biol; 1995; 42(3-4):256-73. PubMed ID: 8738551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Drivers of desire for more children among childbearing women in sub-Saharan Africa: implications for fertility control.
Ahinkorah BO; Seidu AA; Armah-Ansah EK; Budu E; Ameyaw EK; Agbaglo E; Yaya S
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Dec; 20(1):778. PubMed ID: 33317476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sex preference and fertility in Peninsular Malaysia.
Pong SL
Stud Fam Plann; 1994; 25(3):137-48. PubMed ID: 7940619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Son Preference and Family Limitation in Pakistan: A Parity- and Contraceptive Method-Specific Analysis.
Channon MD
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2017 Sep; 43(3):99-110. PubMed ID: 29553471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Son preference in Bangladesh: an emerging barrier to fertility regulation.
Amin R; Mariam AG
J Biosoc Sci; 1987 Apr; 19(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 3584179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact and determinants of sex preference in Nepal.
Leone T; Matthews Z; Dalla Zuanna G
Int Fam Plan Perspect; 2003 Jun; 29(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 12783770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
