These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29487899)

  • 1. Convolutional neural network for earthquake detection and location.
    Perol T; Gharbi M; Denolle M
    Sci Adv; 2018 Feb; 4(2):e1700578. PubMed ID: 29487899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Earthquake detection through computationally efficient similarity search.
    Yoon CE; O'Reilly O; Bergen KJ; Beroza GC
    Sci Adv; 2015 Dec; 1(11):e1501057. PubMed ID: 26665176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. GroningenNet: Deep Learning for Low-Magnitude Earthquake Detection on a Multi-Level Sensor Network.
    Shaheen A; Waheed UB; Fehler M; Sokol L; Hanafy S
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Dec; 21(23):. PubMed ID: 34884084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatiotemporal Graph Convolutional Networks for Earthquake Source Characterization.
    Zhang X; Reichard-Flynn W; Zhang M; Hirn M; Lin Y
    J Geophys Res Solid Earth; 2022 Nov; 127(11):e2022JB024401. PubMed ID: 37033773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Presenting a new method to improve the detection of micro-seismic events.
    Ghorbani S; Barari M; Hoseini M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Jul; 190(8):464. PubMed ID: 30003406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pore-pressure diffusion, enhanced by poroelastic stresses, controls induced seismicity in Oklahoma.
    Zhai G; Shirzaei M; Manga M; Chen X
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Aug; 116(33):16228-16233. PubMed ID: 31358640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Earthquake hazard and risk analysis for natural and induced seismicity: towards objective assessments in the face of uncertainty.
    Bommer JJ
    Bull Earthq Eng; 2022; 20(6):2825-3069. PubMed ID: 35474945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MyShake: A smartphone seismic network for earthquake early warning and beyond.
    Kong Q; Allen RM; Schreier L; Kwon YW
    Sci Adv; 2016 Feb; 2(2):e1501055. PubMed ID: 26933682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Early Warning System for Earthquake Prediction from Seismic Data Using Batch Normalized Graph Convolutional Neural Network with Attention Mechanism (BNGCNNATT).
    Bilal MA; Ji Y; Wang Y; Akhter MP; Yaqub M
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Aug; 22(17):. PubMed ID: 36080941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Earthquake Event Recognition on Smartphones Based on Neural Network Models.
    Chen M; Peng C; Cheng Z
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Nov; 22(22):. PubMed ID: 36433365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Locating induced earthquakes with a network of seismic stations in Oklahoma via a deep learning method.
    Zhang X; Zhang J; Yuan C; Liu S; Chen Z; Li W
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):1941. PubMed ID: 32029857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How will induced seismicity in Oklahoma respond to decreased saltwater injection rates?
    Langenbruch C; Zoback MD
    Sci Adv; 2016 Nov; 2(11):e1601542. PubMed ID: 28138533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural network models for earthquake magnitude prediction using multiple seismicity indicators.
    Panakkat A; Adeli H
    Int J Neural Syst; 2007 Feb; 17(1):13-33. PubMed ID: 17393560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Space geodetic evidence for rapid strain rates in the New Madrid seismic zone of central USA.
    Smalley R; Ellis MA; Paul J; Van Arsdale RB
    Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7045):1088-90. PubMed ID: 15973405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diffusion of epicenters of earthquake aftershocks, Omori's law, and generalized continuous-time random walk models.
    Helmstetter A; Sornette D
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2002 Dec; 66(6 Pt 1):061104. PubMed ID: 12513267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting the Maximum Earthquake Magnitude from Seismic Data in Israel and Its Neighboring Countries.
    Last M; Rabinowitz N; Leonard G
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146101. PubMed ID: 26812351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physics-based forecasting of man-made earthquake hazards in Oklahoma and Kansas.
    Langenbruch C; Weingarten M; Zoback MD
    Nat Commun; 2018 Sep; 9(1):3946. PubMed ID: 30258058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of Convolutional Neural Network to GIS and Physics.
    Liu J; Dong F; Li Z
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():8559343. PubMed ID: 35909828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clustering Analysis of Seismicity in the Anatolian Region with Implications for Seismic Hazard.
    Zaccagnino D; Telesca L; Tan O; Doglioni C
    Entropy (Basel); 2023 May; 25(6):. PubMed ID: 37372179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The origin of the recent (2012-2016) seismic activity in the Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, area: A block boundary interaction?
    Yamamoto J; Espíndola JM; Zamora-Camacho A; Castellanos G
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0200991. PubMed ID: 30161126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.