367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29488870)
1. Speech Understanding and Sound Source Localization by Cochlear Implant Listeners Using a Pinna-Effect Imitating Microphone and an Adaptive Beamformer.
Dorman MF; Natale S; Loiselle L
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 29488870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sound Source Localization and Speech Understanding in Complex Listening Environments by Single-sided Deaf Listeners After Cochlear Implantation.
Zeitler DM; Dorman MF; Natale SJ; Loiselle L; Yost WA; Gifford RH
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Sep; 36(9):1467-71. PubMed ID: 26375967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Value of Unilateral CIs, CI-CROS and Bilateral CIs, with and without Beamformer Microphones, for Speech Understanding in a Simulation of a Restaurant Environment.
Dorman MF; Cook Natale S; Agrawal S
Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(5):270-276. PubMed ID: 30537753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using ILD or ITD Cues for Sound Source Localization and Speech Understanding in a Complex Listening Environment by Listeners With Bilateral and With Hearing-Preservation Cochlear Implants.
Loiselle LH; Dorman MF; Yost WA; Cook SJ; Gifford RH
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Aug; 59(4):810-8. PubMed ID: 27411035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Microphone Configuration and Sound Source Location on Speech Recognition for Adult Cochlear Implant Users with Current-Generation Sound Processors.
Dwyer RT; Roberts J; Gifford RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Sep; 31(8):578-589. PubMed ID: 32340055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using Microphone Technology to Improve Speech Perception in Noise in Children with Cochlear Implants.
Johnstone PM; Mills KET; Humphrey E; Yeager KR; Jones E; McElligott K; Pierce A; Agrawal S; Froeling C; Little JP
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Oct; 29(9):814-825. PubMed ID: 30278866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Noise of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Bimodal Fitting Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
Choi JE; Moon IJ; Kim EY; Park HS; Kim BK; Chung WH; Cho YS; Brown CJ; Hong SH
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):426-440. PubMed ID: 28085740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. AutoAdaptive: A Noise Level-Sensitive Beamformer for MED EL Cochlear Implant Patients.
Dorman MF; Natale SC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Sep; 30(8):731-734. PubMed ID: 30417824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cochlear implant microphone location affects speech recognition in diffuse noise.
Kolberg ER; Sheffield SW; Davis TJ; Sunderhaus LW; Gifford RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):51-8; quiz 109-10. PubMed ID: 25597460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech Understanding in Noise by Patients With Cochlear Implants Using a Monaural Adaptive Beamformer.
Dorman MF; Natale S; Spahr A; Castioni E
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 60(8):2360-2363. PubMed ID: 28768324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An Evaluation of Hearing Aid Beamforming Microphone Arrays in a Noisy Laboratory Setting.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Feb; 30(2):131-144. PubMed ID: 30461406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving speech perception in noise for children with cochlear implants.
Gifford RH; Olund AP; DeJong M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):623-632. PubMed ID: 22192607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Remote Microphone Systems for Cochlear Implant Recipients in Small Group Settings.
Miller S; Wolfe J; Neumann S; Schafer EC; Galster J; Agrawal S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Mar; 33(3):142-148. PubMed ID: 36216041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Speech recognition and comfort using hearing instruments with adaptive directional characteristics in asymmetric listening conditions.
Mackenzie E; Lutman ME
Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):669-79. PubMed ID: 16378001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech performance and sound localization in a complex noisy environment in bilaterally implanted adult patients.
Mosnier I; Sterkers O; Bebear JP; Godey B; Robier A; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Bordure P; Mondain M; Bouccara D; Bozorg-Grayeli A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Ferrary E
Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(2):106-14. PubMed ID: 18832816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System.
Spriet A; Van Deun L; Eftaxiadis K; Laneau J; Moonen M; van Dijk B; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 17204899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unilateral Hearing Loss: Understanding Speech Recognition and Localization Variability-Implications for Cochlear Implant Candidacy.
Firszt JB; Reeder RM; Holden LK
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):159-173. PubMed ID: 28067750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
