These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2948940)

  • 1. Computerized assessment of preference for severely handicapped individuals.
    Dattilo J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1986; 19(4):445-8. PubMed ID: 2948940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of behavioral assessment to prescribe and evaluate treatments for severely handicapped children.
    Steege MW; Wacker DP; Berg WK; Cigrand KK; Cooper LJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1989; 22(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 2523371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Persons with multiple disabilities accessing stimulation and requesting social contact via microswitch and VOCA devices: new research evaluation and social validation.
    Lancioni GE; O'Reilly MF; Singh NN; Sigafoos J; Didden R; Oliva D; Campodonico F; de Pace C; Chiapparino C; Groeneweg J
    Res Dev Disabil; 2009; 30(5):1084-94. PubMed ID: 19361954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validating predicted activity preferences of individuals with severe disabilities.
    Newton JS; Ard WR; Horner RH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 8331020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing food preferences among persons with profound mental retardation: providing opportunities to make choices.
    Parsons MB; Reid DH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1990; 23(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 2373654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Teaching leisure skills to severely handicapped adults: an age-appropriate darts game.
    Schleien SJ; Wehman P; Kiernan J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1981; 14(4):513-9. PubMed ID: 7328071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A matched sample investigation of nonadaptive behavior of severely handicapped adults across four living situations.
    Scanlon CA; Arick JR; Krug DA
    Am J Ment Defic; 1982 Mar; 86(5):526-32. PubMed ID: 6214949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A systematic evaluation of preferences identified through person-centered planning for people with profound multiple disabilities.
    Reid DH; Everson JM; Green CW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):467-77. PubMed ID: 10641301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of behavior state conditions and associated environmental variables among students with profound handicaps.
    Guess D; Roberts S; Siegel-Causey E; Ault M; Guy B; Thompson B; Rues J
    Am J Ment Retard; 1993 May; 97(6):634-53. PubMed ID: 8517944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Embedded evaluation of preferences sampled from person-centered plans for people with profound multiple disabilities.
    Green CW; Middleton SG; Reid DH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(4):639-42. PubMed ID: 11214041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Longitudinal analysis of leisure-item preferences.
    Zhou L; Iwata BA; Goff GA; Shore BA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 11421310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensory reinforcement: effects of response-contingent vestibular stimulation on multiply handicapped children.
    Sandler AG; McLain SC
    Am J Ment Defic; 1987 Jan; 91(4):373-8. PubMed ID: 2949617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of blacklight as visual stimulation for people with profound mental retardation and multiple handicaps.
    Potenski DH
    Ment Retard; 1993 Apr; 31(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 8479329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three persons with multiple disabilities accessing environmental stimuli and asking for social contact through microswitch and VOCA technology.
    Lancioni GE; O'Reilly MF; Singh NN; Sigafoos J; Oliva D; Severini L
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2008 Apr; 52(Pt 4):327-36. PubMed ID: 18339095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Motor assessment tools: their concurrent validity in evaluating children with multiple handicaps.
    Harris SR; Thompson M; McGrew L
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1983 Oct; 64(10):468-70. PubMed ID: 6226253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of establishing operations on preference assessment outcomes.
    Gottschalk JM; Libby ME; Graff RB
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 10738955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship between degree of infant handicap and clarity of infant cues.
    Yoder PJ
    Am J Ment Defic; 1987 May; 91(6):639-41. PubMed ID: 2954463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comprehensive evaluation of reinforcer identification processes for persons with profound multiple handicaps.
    Green CW; Reid DH; Canipe VS; Gardner SM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1991; 24(3):537-52. PubMed ID: 1836459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Replication and extended analysis of behavior state, environmental events, and related variables among individuals with profound disabilities.
    Guess D; Roberts S; Siegel-Causey E; Rues J
    Am J Ment Retard; 1995 Jul; 100(1):36-51. PubMed ID: 7546635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Empirically based methods to assess the preferences of individuals with severe disabilities.
    Lohrmann-O'Rourke S; Browder DM
    Am J Ment Retard; 1998 Sep; 103(2):146-61. PubMed ID: 9779282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.