These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2949047)

  • 1. The role of visual similarity in picture categorization.
    Snodgrass JG; McCullough B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1986 Jan; 12(1):147-54. PubMed ID: 2949047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The effect of visual similarity on picture categorization and identification].
    Matsukawa J
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1995 Feb; 65(6):437-45. PubMed ID: 7752566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An enquiry into the process of categorization of pictures and words.
    Viswanathan M; Childers TL
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Feb; 96(1):267-87. PubMed ID: 12705535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual effects in picture and word categorization.
    Lotto L; Job R; Rumiati R
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Jul; 27(4):674-84. PubMed ID: 10479826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uncovering contrast categories in categorization with a probabilistic threshold model.
    Verheyen S; De Deyne S; Dry MJ; Storms G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1515-31. PubMed ID: 21767056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Processing Speed of Scene Categorization at Multiple Levels of Description: The Superordinate Advantage Revisited.
    Banno H; Saiki J
    Perception; 2015 Mar; 44(3):269-88. PubMed ID: 26562252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The picture superiority effect in categorization: visual or semantic?
    Job R; Rumiati R; Lotto L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Sep; 18(5):1019-28. PubMed ID: 1402707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Theoretical analysis of the cognitive processing of lexical and pictorial stimuli: reading, naming, and visual and conceptual comparisons.
    Theios J; Amrhein PC
    Psychol Rev; 1989 Jan; 96(1):5-24. PubMed ID: 2928419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Categorizing chairs and naming pears: category differences in object processing as a function of task and priming.
    Lloyd-Jones TJ; Humphreys GW
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Sep; 25(5):606-24. PubMed ID: 9337580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Picture superiority in conceptual memory: dissociative effects of encoding and retrieval tasks.
    Vaidya CJ; Gabrieli JD
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Oct; 28(7):1165-72. PubMed ID: 11126939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An event-related potential investigation of the relationship between semantic and perceptual levels of representation.
    van Schie HT; Wijers AA; Kellenbach ML; Stowe LA
    Brain Lang; 2003 Aug; 86(2):300-25. PubMed ID: 12921770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interference of spoken word recognition through phonological priming from visual objects and printed words.
    McQueen JM; Huettig F
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):190-200. PubMed ID: 24132709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The visual what for area: words and pictures in the left fusiform gyrus.
    Starrfelt R; Gerlach C
    Neuroimage; 2007 Mar; 35(1):334-42. PubMed ID: 17239621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Categorization and category effects in normal object recognition: a PET study.
    Gerlach C; Law I; Gade A; Paulson OB
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(13):1693-703. PubMed ID: 11099727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What some effects might not be: the time to verify membership in "well-defined" categories.
    Larochelle S; Richard S; Soulières I
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Nov; 53(4):929-61. PubMed ID: 11131822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual differentiation as a source of category effects in object processing: evidence from naming and object decision.
    Lloyd-Jones TJ; Humphreys GW
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Jan; 25(1):18-35. PubMed ID: 9046867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison and contrast in perceptual categorization.
    Hampton JA; Estes Z; Simmons CL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1459-76. PubMed ID: 16393057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Similarity- versus rule-based categorization.
    Smith EE; Sloman SA
    Mem Cognit; 1994 Jul; 22(4):377-86. PubMed ID: 7934944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Similarity and categorization: from vision to touch.
    Gaissert N; Bülthoff HH; Wallraven C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):219-30. PubMed ID: 21752344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The fickle nature of similarity change as a result of categorization.
    Pothos EM; Reppa I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(12):2425-38. PubMed ID: 24902601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.