318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29490530)
1. Robotic-assisted vs. laparoscopic and abdominal myomectomy for treatment of uterine fibroids: a meta-analysis.
Wang T; Tang H; Xie Z; Deng S
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2018 Oct; 27(5):249-264. PubMed ID: 29490530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Myomectomy versus Abdominal Myomectomy for Large Myomas Sized over 10 cm or Weighing 250 g.
Lee SR; Lee ES; Lee YJ; Lee SW; Park JY; Kim DY; Kim SH; Kim YM; Suh DS; Kim YT
Yonsei Med J; 2020 Dec; 61(12):1054-1059. PubMed ID: 33251780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy and safety of robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus laparoscopic myomectomy: a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis.
Sheng Y; Hong Z; Wang J; Mao B; Wu Z; Gou Y; Zhao J; Liu Q
World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jul; 21(1):230. PubMed ID: 37507735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of robotic assisted laparoscopic myomectomy with barbed sutures and traditional laparoscopic myomectomy with barbed sutures.
Chen YC; Lin HH; Hsiao SM
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Oct; 57(5):709-712. PubMed ID: 30342656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perioperative Outcomes of Myomectomy for Extreme Myoma Burden: Comparison of Surgical Approaches.
Jansen LJ; Clark NV; Dmello M; Gu X; Einarsson JI; Cohen SL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1095-1103. PubMed ID: 30391510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects and costs of laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy in patients with uterine fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen R; Su Z; Yang L; Xin L; Yuan X; Wang Y
BMC Surg; 2020 Mar; 20(1):55. PubMed ID: 32192462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy outcomes with laparoscopic myomectomy.
Göçmen A; Şanlıkan F; Uçar MG
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jan; 287(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 22933121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the initial surgical experience with robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy.
Pluchino N; Litta P; Freschi L; Russo M; Simi G; Santoro AN; Angioni S; Gadducci A; Cela V
Int J Med Robot; 2014 Jun; 10(2):208-12. PubMed ID: 24123629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictors of Prolonged Operative Time for Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Myomectomy: Development of a Preoperative Calculator for Total Operative Time.
Movilla P; Orlando M; Wang J; Opoku-Anane J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):646-654. PubMed ID: 31034977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic assisted vs laparoscopic and/or open myomectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical evidence.
Iavazzo C; Mamais I; Gkegkes ID
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Jul; 294(1):5-17. PubMed ID: 26969650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic complex myomectomy: a single medical center's experience.
Cheng HY; Chen YJ; Wang PH; Tsai HW; Chang YH; Twu NF; Juang CM; Wu H; Yen MS; Chao KC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 54(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 25675917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Postoperative outcomes after robotic versus abdominal myomectomy.
Griffin L; Feinglass J; Garrett A; Henson A; Cohen L; Chaudhari A; Lin A
JSLS; 2013; 17(3):407-13. PubMed ID: 24018077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic uterine artery bipolar coagulation plus myomectomy vs traditional laparoscopic myomectomy for "large" uterine fibroids: comparison of clinical efficacy.
Ciavattini A; Clemente N; Delli Carpini G; Saccardi C; Borgato S; Litta P
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Dec; 296(6):1167-1173. PubMed ID: 28956149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of uterine scarring between robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy and conventional laparoscopic myomectomy.
Sheu BC; Huang KJ; Huang SC; Chang WC
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Oct; 40(7):974-980. PubMed ID: 31790613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A case-control study to compare the outcome of women treated by two minimally invasive procedures-ultraminilaparotomy myomectomy and laparoscopic myomectomy.
Wen KC; Sung PL; Chang WH; Horng HC; Chen YJ; Lee WL; Wang PH
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 57(2):264-269. PubMed ID: 29673671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minilaparotomy Versus Laparoscopic Myomectomy After Cessation of Power Morcellation: Rate of Wound Complications.
Dubin AK; Wei J; Sullivan S; Udaltsova N; Zaritsky E; Yamamoto MP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):946-953. PubMed ID: 28552622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hybrid Robotic Single-Site Myomectomy Using the GelPoint Platform.
Yuk JS; Kim YA; Lee JH
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Nov; 29(11):1475-1480. PubMed ID: 31424320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. High-intensity focused ultrasound and laparoscopic myomectomy in the treatment of uterine fibroids: a comparative study.
Liu Y; Ran W; Shen Y; Feng W; Yi J
BJOG; 2017 Aug; 124 Suppl 3():36-39. PubMed ID: 28856854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic Myomectomy with Temporary Bilateral Uterine Artery and Utero-Ovarian Vessels Occlusion Compared with Traditional Surgery for Uterine Fibroids: Blood Loss and Recurrence.
Jin L; Ji L; Shao M; Hu M
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2019; 84(6):548-554. PubMed ID: 30965324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robot-assisted myomectomy.
Lonnerfors C
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Jan; 46():113-119. PubMed ID: 29103894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
