These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29490538)

  • 1. How to tell a patient's story? Influence of the case narrative design on the clinical reasoning process in virtual patients.
    Hege I; Dietl A; Kiesewetter J; Schelling J; Kiesewetter I
    Med Teach; 2018 Jul; 40(7):736-742. PubMed ID: 29490538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uncovering the relation between clinical reasoning and diagnostic accuracy - An analysis of learner's clinical reasoning processes in virtual patients.
    Hege I; Kononowicz AA; Kiesewetter J; Foster-Johnson L
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204900. PubMed ID: 30286136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Virtual patient simulation: what do students make of it? A focus group study.
    Botezatu M; Hult H; Fors UG
    BMC Med Educ; 2010 Dec; 10():91. PubMed ID: 21129220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Web-based virtual patients in nursing education: development and validation of theory-anchored design and activity models.
    Georg C; Zary N
    J Med Internet Res; 2014 Apr; 16(4):e105. PubMed ID: 24727709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experiencing virtual patients in clinical learning: a phenomenological study.
    Edelbring S; Dastmalchi M; Hult H; Lundberg IE; Dahlgren LO
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2011 Aug; 16(3):331-45. PubMed ID: 21656337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learning clinical reasoning: how virtual patient case format and prior knowledge interact.
    Kiesewetter J; Sailer M; Jung VM; Schönberger R; Bauer E; Zottmann JM; Hege I; Zimmermann H; Fischer F; Fischer MR
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 Mar; 20(1):73. PubMed ID: 32171297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Design principles for virtual patients: a focus group study among students.
    Huwendiek S; Reichert F; Bosse HM; de Leng BA; van der Vleuten CP; Haag M; Hoffmann GF; Tönshoff B
    Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):580-8. PubMed ID: 19493183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Virtual patients design and its effect on clinical reasoning and student experience: a protocol for a randomised factorial multi-centre study.
    Bateman J; Allen ME; Kidd J; Parsons N; Davies D
    BMC Med Educ; 2012 Aug; 12():62. PubMed ID: 22853706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Virtual patients designed for training against medical error: Exploring the impact of decision-making on learner motivation.
    Woodham LA; Round J; Stenfors T; Bujacz A; Karlgren K; Jivram T; Riklefs V; Poulton E; Poulton T
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215597. PubMed ID: 31013295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Virtual patient design: exploring what works and why. A grounded theory study.
    Bateman J; Allen M; Samani D; Kidd J; Davies D
    Med Educ; 2013 Jun; 47(6):595-606. PubMed ID: 23662877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical reasoning in nursing, a think-aloud study using virtual patients - a base for an innovative assessment.
    Forsberg E; Ziegert K; Hult H; Fors U
    Nurse Educ Today; 2014 Apr; 34(4):538-42. PubMed ID: 23938093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of Diagnostic Competences With Standardized Patients Versus Virtual Patients: Experimental Study in the Context of History Taking.
    Fink MC; Reitmeier V; Stadler M; Siebeck M; Fischer F; Fischer MR
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Mar; 23(3):e21196. PubMed ID: 33661122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influences of OSCE design on students' diagnostic reasoning.
    Lafleur A; Côté L; Leppink J
    Med Educ; 2015 Feb; 49(2):203-14. PubMed ID: 25626751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advancing clinical reasoning in virtual patients - development and application of a conceptual framework.
    Hege I; Kononowicz AA; Berman NB; Lenzer B; Kiesewetter J
    GMS J Med Educ; 2018; 35(1):Doc12. PubMed ID: 29497697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Curricular integration of virtual patients: a unifying perspective of medical teachers and students.
    Dafli E; Fountoukidis I; Hatzisevastou-Loukidou C; D Bamidis P
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Nov; 19(1):416. PubMed ID: 31706296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrating virtual patients into courses: follow-up seminars and perceived benefit.
    Edelbring S; Broström O; Henriksson P; Vassiliou D; Spaak J; Dahlgren LO; Fors U; Zary N
    Med Educ; 2012 Apr; 46(4):417-25. PubMed ID: 22429178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design and implementation of virtual patients for learning of clinical reasoning.
    Huwendiek S
    GMS J Med Educ; 2019; 36(4):Doc33. PubMed ID: 31544133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of virtual patient scenarios as a vehicle for teaching professionalism.
    Marei HF; Al-Eraky MM; Almasoud NN; Donkers J; Van Merrienboer JJG
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2018 May; 22(2):e253-e260. PubMed ID: 28691267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Virtual patients in the acquisition of clinical reasoning skills: does presentation mode matter? A quasi-randomized controlled trial.
    Schubach F; Goos M; Fabry G; Vach W; Boeker M
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Sep; 17(1):165. PubMed ID: 28915871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using Foreign Virtual Patients With Medical Students in Germany: Are Cultural Differences Evident and Do They Impede Learning?
    Walldorf J; Jähnert T; Berman NB; Fischer MR
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e260. PubMed ID: 27678418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.