These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29491198)

  • 1. A modified shark-fin test simulating the single-step/double-mix technique: A comparison of three groups of elastomers.
    Huettig F; Chekhani U; Klink A; Said F; Rupp F
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Jun; 37(3):414-421. PubMed ID: 29491198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Flow profile of regular and fast-setting elastomeric impression materials using a shark fin testing device.
    Lawson NC; Cakir D; Ramp L; Burgess JO
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 23(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 21649832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hydrophilicity of unset and set elastomeric impression materials.
    Rupp F; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):552-4. PubMed ID: 21209992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surface detail reproduction of elastomeric impression materials related to rheological properties.
    German MJ; Carrick TE; McCabe JF
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):951-6. PubMed ID: 18164051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of elastomeric impression materials' thixotropic behavior.
    Tolidis K; Tortopidis D; Gerasimou P; Theocharidou A; Boutsiouki C
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2013 Jun; 21(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 23888530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of relative humidity on the hydrophilicity of unset elastomeric impression materials.
    Rupp F; Axmann D; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 18350951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Applicable research in practice: understanding the hydrophilic and flow property measurements of impression materials.
    Perry RD; Goldberg JA; Benchimol J; Orfanidis J
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2006 Oct; 27(10):582-6. PubMed ID: 17120392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sulcus depth reproduction with polyvinyl siloxane impression material: effects of hydrophilicity and impression temperature.
    Takahashi H; Finger WJ; Kurokawa R; Furukawa M; Komatsu M
    Quintessence Int; 2010 Mar; 41(3):e43-50. PubMed ID: 20213014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlation of impression removal force with elastomeric impression material rigidity and hardness.
    Walker MP; Alderman N; Petrie CS; Melander J; McGuire J
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):362-6. PubMed ID: 23387301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temperature effects on the rheological properties of current polyether and polysiloxane impression materials during setting.
    Berg JC; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Adán-Plaza S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 12886208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hydrophilicity of elastomeric non-aqueous impression materials during setting.
    Rupp F; Axmann D; Jacobi A; Groten M; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    Dent Mater; 2005 Feb; 21(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 15681007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hydrophilic poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials: dimensional accuracy, wettability, and effect on gypsum hardness.
    Panichuttra R; Jones RM; Goodacre C; Munoz CA; Moore BK
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(3):240-8. PubMed ID: 1810315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in properties of nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials after storage of components.
    Hondrum SO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 11174682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contact angle of unset elastomeric impression materials.
    Menees TS; Radhakrishnan R; Ramp LC; Burgess JO; Lawson NC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):536-42. PubMed ID: 26187106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Linear dimensional accuracy of a polyvinyl siloxane of varying viscosities using different impression techniques.
    Mishra S; Chowdhary R
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2010 Aug; 1(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 25427185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Lampé I; Marton S; Hegedüs C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):590. PubMed ID: 15543917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of selected vinyl polysiloxane and vinyl polysiloxane-hybrid elastomeric impression materials.
    Megremis S; Tiba A; Vogt K; Geary R; Kuehne J
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Apr; 143(4):405-6. PubMed ID: 22467705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of mixing technique on surface characteristics of impression materials.
    Lepe X; Johnson GH; Berg JC; Aw TC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 May; 79(5):495-502. PubMed ID: 9597600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: Part I.
    Chai JY; Jameson LM; Moser JB; Hesby RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Aug; 66(2):201-9. PubMed ID: 1774680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.