These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29491514)

  • 1. Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with the I-Gel™ in the different head-and-neck positions in anaesthetised paralysed children: A randomised controlled trial.
    Banerjee G; Jain D; Bala I; Gandhi K; Samujh R
    Indian J Anaesth; 2018 Feb; 62(2):103-108. PubMed ID: 29491514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of I-gel™ airway in different head and neck positions in anesthetized paralyzed children.
    Jain D; Ghai B; Bala I; Gandhi K; Banerjee G
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2015 Dec; 25(12):1248-53. PubMed ID: 26383088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomised controlled trial comparing ProSeal laryngeal mask airway, i-gel and Laryngeal Tube Suction-D under general anaesthesia for elective surgical patients requiring controlled ventilation.
    Das B; Varshney R; Mitra S
    Indian J Anaesth; 2017 Dec; 61(12):972-977. PubMed ID: 29307902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of i-gel™ and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ in Different Head and Neck Positions in Spontaneously Breathing Pediatric Population.
    Gupta S; Dogra N; Chauhan K
    Anesth Essays Res; 2017; 11(3):647-650. PubMed ID: 28928564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of Head and Neck Position on Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure and Cuff Position with the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway and the I-Gel: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Mishra SK; Nawaz M; Satyapraksh MV; Parida S; Bidkar PU; Hemavathy B; Kundra P
    Anesthesiol Res Pract; 2015; 2015():705869. PubMed ID: 25648620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of airway dynamics in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia with controlled ventilation using ProSeal laryngeal mask airway, I-Gel™ and Baska mask.
    Kumar B; Gupta B; Thakur A; Rana S; Garg M; Nehria M
    Indian J Anaesth; 2022 Dec; 66(12):842-848. PubMed ID: 36654901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenberg position on oropharyngeal sealing pressure of I-gel™ and ProSeal LMA™ in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: A randomized controlled trial.
    Mishra SK; Sivaraman B; Balachander H; Naggappa M; Parida S; Bhat RR; Yuvaraj K
    Anesth Essays Res; 2015; 9(3):353-8. PubMed ID: 26712973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal and the laryngeal tube airway in paralyzed anesthetized adult patients undergoing pressure-controlled ventilation.
    Brimacombe J; Keller C; Brimacombe L
    Anesth Analg; 2002 Sep; 95(3):770-6, table of contents. PubMed ID: 12198070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flexion decreases the ventilation quality of the Ambu
    Lee JH; Jang YE; Kim EH; Kim HS; Kim JT
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2018 Sep; 62(8):1080-1085. PubMed ID: 29797717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of Success and Ease of Insertion of ProSeal™ Laryngeal Mask Airway versus I-gel™ Insertion by Paramedics in Simulated Difficult Airway Using Cervical Collar in Different Positions in Manikins.
    Gupta A; Kabi A; Gaur D
    Anesth Essays Res; 2020; 14(4):627-631. PubMed ID: 34349332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stability of the LMA-ProSeal and standard laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions: a randomized crossover study.
    Brimacombe J; Keller C
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2003 Jan; 20(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12553391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of head and neck position on the oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position of three supraglottic airway devices.
    Park SH; Han SH; Do SH; Kim JW; Kim JH
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Jan; 108(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 19095838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of head and neck positions on oropharyngeal seal pressure with Baska mask
    Sidhu GK; Jindal S; Mahajan R; Bhagat S
    Indian J Anaesth; 2020 Aug; 64(8):675-680. PubMed ID: 32934401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomised trial to compare i-gel and ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway for airway management in paediatric patients.
    Nirupa R; Gombar S; Ahuja V; Sharma P
    Indian J Anaesth; 2016 Oct; 60(10):726-731. PubMed ID: 27761035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position with the flexible and the standard laryngeal mask airway.
    Keller C; Brimacombe J
    Anesth Analg; 1999 Apr; 88(4):913-6. PubMed ID: 10195547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of air-Q™, i-gel™, and laryngeal mask airway supreme™ in adult patients during general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.
    Damodaran S; Sethi S; Malhotra SK; Samra T; Maitra S; Saini V
    Saudi J Anaesth; 2017; 11(4):390-395. PubMed ID: 29033717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of I-Gel
    Jain D; Ghai B; Gandhi K; Banerjee G; Bala I; Samujh R
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2016 Dec; 26(12):1136-1141. PubMed ID: 27779349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A study of effect of lateral position on oropharyngeal seal pressure of i-gel
    Thakur DP; Malde AD
    Indian J Anaesth; 2020 Feb; 64(2):125-130. PubMed ID: 32139930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Size 1 ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, noncrossover study with the Classic™ laryngeal mask airway.
    López-Gil M; Mantilla I; Blanco T; Teigell E; Hervias M; Fernández-López R
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Apr; 22(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 22295870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pharyngeal mucosal pressures with the laryngeal tube airway versus ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.
    Keller C; Brimacombe J; Kleinsasser A; Loeckinger A
    Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2003 Jun; 38(6):393-6. PubMed ID: 12759874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.