260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29492041)
1. Interspecific competition, hybridization, and reproductive isolation in secondary contact: missing perspectives on males and females.
Lipshutz SE
Curr Zool; 2018 Feb; 64(1):75-88. PubMed ID: 29492041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Linking intra- and interspecific assortative mating: Consequences for asymmetric sexual isolation.
Svensson EI; Nordén A; Waller JT; Runemark A
Evolution; 2016 Jun; 70(6):1165-79. PubMed ID: 27151764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experimental evidence for asymmetric mate preference and aggression: behavioral interactions in a woodrat (Neotoma) hybrid zone.
Shurtliff QR; Murphy PJ; Yeiter JD; Matocq MD
BMC Evol Biol; 2013 Oct; 13():220. PubMed ID: 24093823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Males and females contribute differently to the evolution of habitat segregation driven by hybridization.
Kyogoku D; Yamaguchi R
J Evol Biol; 2023 Mar; 36(3):515-528. PubMed ID: 36721300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproductive Costs for Hybridizing Female Anasa tristis (Hemiptera: Coreidae), but No Evidence of Selection Against Interspecific Mating.
Hamel JA; Eskeland EE; Lehmann TK; Stover PL
J Insect Sci; 2018 Jul; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 30165456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mate-guarding duration is mainly influenced by the risk of sperm competition and not by female quality in a golden orb-weaver spider.
Del Matto LA; Macedo-Rego RC; Santos ESA
PeerJ; 2021; 9():e12310. PubMed ID: 34733589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Asymmetric dominance and asymmetric mate choice oppose premating isolation after allopatric divergence.
Sefc KM; Hermann CM; Steinwender B; Brindl H; Zimmermann H; Mattersdorfer K; Postl L; Makasa L; Sturmbauer C; Koblmüller S
Ecol Evol; 2015 Apr; 5(8):1549-62. PubMed ID: 25937900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Female competition and its evolutionary consequences in mammals.
Stockley P; Bro-Jørgensen J
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2011 May; 86(2):341-66. PubMed ID: 20636474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
Fedina TY; Lewis SM
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trial marriage model-Female mate choice under male interference.
Li MY; Geng ZS; Liao P; Wang XY; Yang TC; Wang JY; Wang DD; Gao LF; Du B
J Anim Ecol; 2020 Aug; 89(8):1851-1859. PubMed ID: 32329064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
Bonduriansky R
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sexual selection and assortative mating: an experimental test.
Debelle A; Ritchie MG; Snook RR
J Evol Biol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):1307-16. PubMed ID: 26970522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits.
Jennions MD; Petrie M
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2000 Feb; 75(1):21-64. PubMed ID: 10740892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. REINFORCEMENT OF STICKLEBACK MATE PREFERENCES: SYMPATRY BREEDS CONTEMPT.
Rundle HD; Schluter D
Evolution; 1998 Feb; 52(1):200-208. PubMed ID: 28568163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Socially flexible female choice and premating isolation in field crickets (Teleogryllus spp.).
Bailey NW; Macleod E
J Evol Biol; 2014 Jan; 27(1):170-80. PubMed ID: 24330452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Why do males choose heterospecific females in the red spider mite?
Sato Y; Staudacher H; Sabelis MW
Exp Appl Acarol; 2016 Jan; 68(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 26530994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evolution of choosiness dictates whether search costs of mate choice enhance speciation by sexual selection.
Yukilevich R; Aoki F
J Evol Biol; 2022 Aug; 35(8):1045-1059. PubMed ID: 35830473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice.
Kozak GM; Reisland M; Boughmann JW
Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19154359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hybrid female mate choice as a species isolating mechanism: environment matters.
Schmidt EM; Pfennig KS
J Evol Biol; 2016 Apr; 29(4):865-9. PubMed ID: 26717048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Asymmetric reproductive isolation between two sympatric annual killifish with extremely short lifespans.
Polačik M; Reichard M
PLoS One; 2011; 6(8):e22684. PubMed ID: 21850233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
