These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29492089)
1. How to run a successful Journal. Jawaid SA; Jawaid M Pak J Med Sci; 2017; 33(6):1517-1520. PubMed ID: 29492089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The different models of scientific journals]. Chippaux JP Med Trop Sante Int; 2023 Dec; 3(4):. PubMed ID: 38390021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Distinguishing Predatory from Reputable Publishing Practices. Happe LE J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2020 Aug; 26(8):956-960. PubMed ID: 32715959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Re: Journal Standards - Editor's reply. Jolly PD N Z Vet J; 2003 Aug; 51(4):199. PubMed ID: 16032326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On exemplary scientific conduct regarding submission of manuscripts to biomedical informatics journals. Miller RA; Groth T; Hasman A; Safran C; Shortliffe EH; Haux R; McCray AT Methods Inf Med; 2006; 45(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 16482363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal. Nielsen MB; Seitz K Ultraschall Med; 2016 Aug; 37(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 27490462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conflicting interests involved in the process of publishing in biomedical journals. Igi R J BUON; 2015; 20(5):1373-7. PubMed ID: 26537088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators. Justice AC; Cho MK; Winker MA; Berlin JA; Rennie D JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):240-2. PubMed ID: 9676668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Journal editors' perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study. Glonti K; Boutron I; Moher D; Hren D BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e033421. PubMed ID: 31767597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Editorial policies and background in editing Macedonian Medical Review and BANTAO journal. Spasovski G Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2014; 35(3):81-4. PubMed ID: 25711225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: 2017/2018 in review. Manning WJ J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2019 Dec; 21(1):79. PubMed ID: 31884956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The publishing game: reflections of an editorial team. Crawford JM; Ketcham CM; Braylan R; Morel L; Terada N; Turner JR; Yachnis AT Lab Invest; 2008 Dec; 88(12):1258-63. PubMed ID: 19020521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts. Enquselassie F Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethical issues in studying submissions to a medical journal. Olson CM; Glass RM; Thacker SB; Stroup DF JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):290-1. PubMed ID: 9676686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are peer reviewers encouraged to use reporting guidelines? A survey of 116 health research journals. Hirst A; Altman DG PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e35621. PubMed ID: 22558178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. From the History of the Croatian Dermatovenereological Society - The Croatian Medical Association and an Overview of Important Information Regarding the Journal Acta Dermatovenerologica Croatica. Dobrić I Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2018 Dec; 26(4):344-348. PubMed ID: 30665489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomedical journal speed and efficiency: a cross-sectional pilot survey of author experiences. Wallach JD; Egilman AC; Gopal AD; Swami N; Krumholz HM; Ross JS Res Integr Peer Rev; 2018; 3():1. PubMed ID: 29451557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The recognition of peer reviewers activity: the potential promotion of a virtuous circle.]. Pierno A; Fruscio R; Bellani G Recenti Prog Med; 2017 Sep; 108(9):355-359. PubMed ID: 28901342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Blinded vs. unblinded peer review of manuscripts submitted to a dermatology journal: a randomized multi-rater study. Alam M; Kim NA; Havey J; Rademaker A; Ratner D; Tregre B; West DP; Coleman WP Br J Dermatol; 2011 Sep; 165(3):563-7. PubMed ID: 21623749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]